I think Kiev would be target #1.What would he nuke though?
I think Kiev would be target #1.What would he nuke though?
What is the concern?My concern with the likes of Estonia aren't for 2022 or 2023. It is 2030, when Russia has licked its wounds and rearmed, and decides it wants to get the entire band back together from the USSR.
Wow. They've been pretty Russia friendly up until now!
It will be much more dangerous for those sabotaging things now because Belarus passed draconian laws in an attempt to stop this.
Agree that if NATO get's involved that's probably what they do...Oh, I think NATO would respond militarily. Almost certainly would be conventional though. Could hit Black Sea fleet or selected targets inside Ukraine with cruise missiles.
“The leak on Nord Stream 2 is very close to the new Baltic Pipe that will bring Norwegian gas to Poland for the first time . . .
I don't think she has been.Wow. They've been pretty Russia friendly up until now!
Then Russia will be destroyed.Crimea won't be agreed upon
She didn't win:I don't think she has been.
Political career[edit]
2020 Belarusian presidential election campaign[edit]
Main article: 2020 Belarusian presidential election
After her husband's arrest on 29 May, Tsikhanouskaya announced her intention to run in his place. She registered as an Independent candidate on 14 July 2020.[5] After registering, she was endorsed by the campaigns of Valery Tsepkalo and Viktar Babaryka, two prominent opposition politicians who were barred from registering, with one being arrested and the other fleeing the country. During the presidential campaign a photo of Tsikhanouskaya with Maria Kolesnikova (Babaryka's campaign chief), and Veronika Tsepkalo (Valery Tsepkalo's wife), became a symbol of her campaign.[6]
The night before the election, police detained senior staffers from Tsikhanouskaya's campaign and she chose to go into hiding in Minsk, before re-emerging on election day at a polling station.[7]
Harassment[edit]
Before the presidential campaign, Belarusian president Alexander Lukashenko insisted that the country was not ready for a female president.[8] Her campaign began as Amnesty International condemned Belarus's discriminatory treatment of women opposition activists, including threats of sexual violence[9] and threats by authorities to take children away from opposition figures and send them to state-run orphanages.[9][10] In response to the threats, Tsikhanouskaya sent her children abroad to live with their grandmother.[10][1][11] During the presidential campaign, Tsikhanouskaya was repeatedly threatened,[12] recounting phone calls from unknown numbers, addressing to her: "We will put you behind bars and place your children in an orphanage."[1] Tsikhanouskaya said she nevertheless decided to persevere in her campaign: "There must be a symbol of freedom."[1]
Platform[edit]
Tsikhanouskaya said that she ran for president out of love, to free her husband from prison.[13] She has vowed to free all political prisoners in Belarus, to introduce democratic reforms to the country, and to move away from the union treaty with Russia, which many Belarusian opposition activists view as an infringement on the country's sovereignty.[1] She has also pledged to set a referendum on returning to the original draft of the 1994 Belarusian constitution, reinstating a limit of two terms for the president.[7][14] She has said that her main goal is to establish free and fair elections. She views the current election as illegitimate due to the government's refusal to register Lukashenko's main political opponents as candidates. She has pledged to deliver a plan for transparent and accountable elections within six months of taking office.[15]
Tsikhanouskaya's economic platform emphasizes increasing the importance of small and medium sized businesses in the Belarusian economy. She plans to offer interest free loans to small and medium sized businesses, cancel state inspections of private entities and provide legal protection for foreign investors. Tsikhanouskaya intends to allow profitable state owned enterprises to continue to operate, while requiring unprofitable state owned enterprises to get help from outside professionals.[16]
Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
$12bln more just approved, that should be enough to alleviate Russia of its inability to clothe, feed, arm, house its conscripts.....
I know, but it was her comments that Russian soldiers should leave, or else. Not the Belarusian government. They may be leaning that way too, but Lukashenko is too smart to say so publicly.She didn't win:
Lock her up!
Or a provocation to justify destroying it once it goes online. See Moscow Apartment bombings leading up to the Chechen conflict.Wouldn't that be spectacular if this was a Russian Naval Ops "Own Goal"..... 🤔
Ukraine isn't, I'm not sure any single country is except the US. However, if we do nothing, then Putin wins. Appeasement doesn't work. I'm not saying the US should use nukes back, although that can't be ruled out. Ideally, I would like to think we have some super secret special forces plan to eliminate Putin if he does use nukes.Here's my thinking...
NATO/US have scrupulously kept away from a direct military confrontation with Russia because of the threat of escalation (aka Russia has nukes)
If Russia uses nukes v Ukraine and NATO/US respond militarily I'd say that threat of escalation (Nukes) goes up exponentially. Is Ukraine worth risking Nuclear Armageddon? That's the calculation the US/NATO (US primarily) will have to make.
I think there's a pretty good chance they respond militarily....I'm just saying it's not a given. I think the amount of sphincter tightening amongst US/NATO members when the "unthinkable" becomes "thinkable" is under estimated,
I think the thing with Russia is that the rot is so deep that if you get rid of Putin you might end up with another a-hole who is bad or worse.Ukraine isn't, I'm not sure any single country is except the US. However, if we do nothing, then Putin wins. Appeasement doesn't work. I'm not saying the US should use nukes back, although that can't be ruled out. Ideally, I would like to think we have some super secret special forces plan to eliminate Putin if he does use nukes.
If you were Special Forces, would you take a suicide mission to eliminate Putin after he nuked Ukraine? Something like that might be the only way to end him without ending civilization.
That is why they need defeated soundly.I think the thing with Russia is that the rot is so deep that if you get rid of Putin you might end up with another a-hole who is bad or worse.
It’d be nice if a guy like Navalny could step in BUT if the US/NATO is seen as installing him he immediately loses legitimacy as a puppet. Russia has to change from within but I don’t know if it’s even possible…..they’ve been rotten for so long
Agree. Unfortunately they still sit on a pile of nukes….kind of limits what we can do to them (NATO/US)That is why they need defeated soundly.
FFS stop posting obviously fake bullshit. Seriously, it degrades this excellent thread.
That's exactly what you'll have, but you hope the next douchebag ends the war in Ukraine while he consolidates power. Ultimately, I'd like to see the country broken up into about 20 smaller countries but I'm afraid that will just create a bunch of kingdoms all fighting with each other. I guess that would be ok as long as we took all the nukes away.I think the thing with Russia is that the rot is so deep that if you get rid of Putin you might end up with another a-hole who is bad or worse.
It’d be nice if a guy like Navalny could step in BUT if the US/NATO is seen as installing him he immediately loses legitimacy as a puppet. Russia has to change from within but I don’t know if it’s even possible…..they’ve been rotten for so long
You are an idiot.FFS stop posting obviously fake bullshit. Seriously, it degrades this excellent thread.