Yes he is and you guys keep engaging with him which will only extend the same pissing match of the same tired back and forth jabs.
Yeah… You think
Yes he is and you guys keep engaging with him which will only extend the same pissing match of the same tired back and forth jabs.
When will skirt fans answer a simple question? They loved to tout how Nebraska was going to win numerous football conference championships yet nothing to show for all their rhetoric.
When will this change?
I am 29 and the real question is this, when I am 60 will Nebraska fans still talk about the 1990's and act like they are entitled to something still. Discuss....
13 and 29, Einstein.
Jealous of our football history at age 29 already.
History is earned not given. Some programs have more than others, Between both of us we know which one is from the other.
We have a new Head Coach and Iowa will be getting one after this season it's going to take time for either program to win the B1G but I think Nebraska will win the West more than Iowa will.
And during that time period we still have a better winning pct than Ferentz.How many coaches has Nebraska had since KF started at Iowa? Four is hilarious. Maybe if they keep firing coaches they will get it right someday.
Quit laughing skirt fans are serious.
Phil Steele?Answer your question with a question. When in the future will Iowa even win their division of the Big Ten? That should be doable, don't you think? um… maybe not
http://www.philsteele.com/Blogs/2015/MAR15/DBMar13.html
Not really any excuses, are there.
To answer your question, I think Neb. can get it done in the next 3 to 4 seasons.
Answer your question with a question. When in the future will Iowa even win their division of the Big Ten? That should be doable, don't you think? um… maybe not
http://www.philsteele.com/Blogs/2015/MAR15/DBMar13.html
Not really any excuses, are there.
To answer your question, I think Neb. can get it done in the next 3 to 4 seasons.
Phil Steele?
When will Nebraska actually be a good as skirt fans think? Skirt fans weren't shy about saying they would come in and win many football conference championships. Not surprising they have been wrong about and probably will be for some time.
I win.
Hey… I get it, you're not that bright. If you are capable, go back to page 2 where I answered your fallacious
question. I understand you're probably moving your lips as you read this, so take your time.
No one else is bothering to answer your question because it's a complete straw-man argument. I don't remember a single poster during our imminent move to the Big Ten saying "we will win multiple Big Ten titles in the first years of being a conference member". As a matter fact, it was Iowa fans saying that we would not be able to compete in the big tough Big Ten. Yet, since joining, Nebraska has the highest winning percentage of any team in the B1G. Go figure.
Hey… I get it, you're not that bright. If you are capable, go back to page 2 where I answered your fallacious
question. I understand you're probably moving your lips as you read this, so take your time.
No one else is bothering to answer your question because it's a complete straw-man argument. I don't remember a single poster during our imminent move to the Big Ten saying "we will win multiple Big Ten titles in the first years of being a conference member". As a matter fact, it was Iowa fans saying that we would not be able to compete in the big tough Big Ten. Yet, since joining, Nebraska has the highest winning percentage of any team in the B1G. Go figure.
Hey… I get it, you're not that bright. If you are capable, go back to page 2 where I answered your fallacious
question. I understand you're probably moving your lips as you read this, so take your time.
No one else is bothering to answer your question because it's a complete straw-man argument. I don't remember a single poster during our imminent move to the Big Ten saying "we will win multiple Big Ten titles in the first years of being a conference member". As a matter fact, it was Iowa fans saying that we would not be able to compete in the big tough Big Ten. Yet, since joining, Nebraska has the highest winning percentage of any team in the B1G. Go figure.
Yes, reference the highlight in the quote above.
It's a link showing Iowa's 2015 strength of schedule. 101 out of the 129 programs, and weakest in the B1G. As in...if you don't win the division this year, you have absolutely no excuse. Pathetically easy schedule.
I love it when skirt fans show us all how myopic they are. More I say, we want more. We want more. We want more.
Your the one that keeps repeating how many Championships we were going to win. Not any of us.
And yes Santa Barb was not thinking straight but in that time what is Iowa record in the B1G and how many division championships have you won?
Keep arguing with 89/91 but it's like arguing with someone with special needs. No one is saying Iowa has won a division championship yet on the other hand no one cares about the one Nebraska has nor does anyone care to hear for the millionth time about husker football past. Plus no one is making outlandish fabrications about iowas winning % and flat out lying about it.
Apparently the B1G is tough, because Iowa has a winning record over only two teams - Indiana and Northwestern. Mighty fine program!Have you voted - if so I missed it.
Trying to keep a tally.
Also keeping tally of Bugeaters bringing up the Big 8 pillowfight history,etc. #'s vs voting....
Somebody cares about Nebraska football – Hint – the one who started this post. Yes, our optimistic hope of a B1G championship has not come about. Hence, we fired a coach that Iowa would consider a dream tenure and continue to look for that person who can do that. Speaking of predictions – Iowa fans continually claimed if they would play us year in and year out, you would beat us a majority of the time. The reality is in four games, we have beat you 75% of the time. That is fairly recent - wouldn't you say? Yes, historically we own you 70%. Yes, we owned you in the 80s, owned you in the 90s, owned you in the 2000 – but that is all history. In the most current decade it appears to be more of the same.Keep arguing with 89/91 but it's like arguing with someone with special needs. No one is saying Iowa has won a division championship yet on the other hand no one cares about the one Nebraska has nor does anyone care to hear for the millionth time about husker football past. Plus no one is making outlandish fabrications about iowas winning % and flat out lying about it.
Somebody cares about Nebraska football – Hint – the one who started this post. Yes, our optimistic hope of a B1G championship has not come about. Hence, we fired a coach that Iowa would consider a dream tenure and continue to look for that person who can do that. Speaking of predictions – Iowa fans continually claimed if they would play us year in and year out, you would beat us a majority of the time. The reality is in four games, we have beat you 75% of the time. That is fairly recent - wouldn't you say? Yes, historically we own you 70%. Yes, we owned you in the 80s, owned you in the 90s, owned you in the 2000 – but that is all history. In the most current decade it appears to be more of the same.
I do understand why history bothers you. In checking out your winning percentage against all other B1G opponents, it appears you only have the edge on two programs. Those are Iowa State type of results. Speaking of recent results, how you doing against your "little brother" since the start of the last decade?
Apparently the B1G is tough, because Iowa has a winning record over only two teams - Indiana and Northwestern. Mighty fine program!
Apparently the B1G is tough, because Iowa has a winning record over only two teams - Indiana and Northwestern. Mighty fine program!
29-13Tougher than Nebraska can handle otherwise they would have a football conference championship before now.
Ouch owned again.
29-13
40-22
One of these records Hawkeye fans call complete domination and the other you don't. Hawkeye Logic at its best.
Why do Iowa fans care so much about Nebraska?
I wouldn't go threw out the history of the Big 10 conference, seems more realistic to start what programs in the Big 10 that they have winning records since Haydon Fry lead Iowa in 1979....
?Pot meet kettle. You could ask why husker fans care about Iowa. Point and case all of them posting here yet only 1 thread on front page out of 50 on Nebraska.
Apparently the B1G is tough, because Iowa has a winning record over only two teams - Indiana and Northwestern. Mighty fine program!
So recent is two years, not just last year or the last three or four years, but just two years to include your lone victory.
I understand your logic perfectly. If recent history is just one year, we have 100% winning average over you. If it is just two years, that makes it 50/50 – the best you can do. Add more years and you're winning percentage drops astronomically. Therefore, the only way the Hawkeye numbers can look remotely respectable is to just include the last two years.
By the way, how are you doing against Iowa State in "recent" history??? Hmmmmm????
Need to post current age and yes/no.
I'm 50-60 and say no.
Pretty spot on assessment.Everything is cyclical. It wasn't long ago that Florida was unstoppable and look where they are now. Bama sucked not too long ago and look where they are now. Look at USC. Look at Colorado. In 2001, Illinois won the B1G. It all goes in waves.
Nebraska, Iowa, Wisconsin and maybe another will won the conference in the next 20-30 years at least once a piece, if not several times (and most likely sooner than 20-30 years, I am being conservative). Ohio State won't be on top forever. They will have down years. Every team does. You are either old or shortsighted to think that Nebraska (or Iowa, or any other team in the top half of the conference) won't win a conference championship in your lifetime.
If you get to the CCG game, all they have to do is be better than the opponent on that day. Va. Tech beat Ohio State last year. VT ended the season at 7-6. You only have to be better on that day.
I don't know how Nebraska will be this season. I am cautiously optimistic. But I am confident that in the next 4-5 years they will get to the CCG at least once.
To be fair, a four game time span between two teams is quite small to draw conclusions on long-term superiority. While Nebby has a 75% winning percentage vs. Iowa, a one-game OT swing game would make it 50%. Over a 10-year timeframe it will likely by near 50%.
Not likely. History would not support that. The best predictor of future results is past performance. Over the last 10 meetings between the two teams (dating back to 1979), Nebraska leads the series 10-2.