ADVERTISEMENT

Hawks advance 10 to Semifinals at NCWWC







It is great to be an Iowa Wrestling fan.

Go Hawks!

Does Kirk Have An Issue With Black Coaches?

Kirk's coaching tree over the past 25 years is as thin as the Charlie Brown Christmas tree. I'm not sure football has seen anything quite like it. Coaching is a big $ business and most coaches are ambitious guys wanting to reach the top.

While Hayden Fry's staff produced 8 - 10 head coaches, including some Hall of Famers, Kirk's staffs have produced a guy currently working at Culvers, several unemployed former coaches, and a series of "yes" men with no ambition to grow their careers.

Now take a look at the internal pecking order / chain of promotions within the program. Do the best coaches typically to move up? What goes into the decisions to promote?

In evaluating, consider Kirk's admitted "blind eye" toward the racial discrimination situation that rocked the program and led to the firing of his strength coach/best friend. Then consider how the investigation called Kirk out for virtually never appointing black players to the team's "leadership counsel." Did he believe black players were not leaders? With that as foundation, take a look at Kirk's coaching personnel decisions over the years (i.e. who he's promoted and who he's kept on staff despite their failures). It makes you wonder whether black coaches at Iowa are given the same opportunity for advancement as the white coaches.

Take the career paths of Brian Ferentz, Seth Wallace, and LeVar Woods as an example:

Woods. 2008 - retired from the NFL. Immediately came back to work at Iowa. Put in 4 years. In 2012, was elevated to position coach, where he excelled. He's now been in the program 16 years but has yet to receive a promotion. He remains a low level position coach despite coaching some of the best special teams units Iowa has ever had.

Wallace. 2014 - after working at a DIII school in Georgia for a few years while somehow developing no recruiting pipeline there, he was hired as a position coach at Iowa. Just 3 years later, Kirk named him assistant defensive coordinator. He was then named in a racial discrimination lawsuit. In 2023, he was once again promoted to some fake title like assistant head coach, and is now paid DOUBLE what Woods is paid despite not even being a coordinator.

Ferentz. 2012 - came to Iowa at the same time Woods became special teams coach. Because Kirk didn't have a spot for him, Kirk chose to toss aside Iowa's legendary OL coach Reece Morgan (and forced him to switch to DLine coach) to make room for inexperienced Brian. With Brian at the helm, the OL immediately saw a drop off. It was about then that Iowa lost its "bullies of the Big 10" status and its run game suffered. Three years later, Kirk promoted Brian to "running game coordinator," a fake title never used before to help justify a future promotion to OC. The run game under Brian was below average for a Big 10 team. Despite that, just one year after being promoted to run game coordinator, Brian was promotion again to offensive coordinator. He received a doubling of his salary despite having never called a play in his life and Kirk not interviewing another soul for the position. Brian was then named in a racial discrimination lawsuit where clear evidence of wrongdoing was presented. Instead of being fired, Brian was rewarded the following year with his 4th promotion, this time taking on QBs coach duties...a position he admitted he knew nothing about.

One of the above is black. The other two are white. Would it be fair to say the white coaches quickly received promotions while the black coach did not? If so, can you reasonably argue that merit was the basis for the coaching decisions?

Removing Brian from the equation, let's now look at Iowa's worst performing coaches over the past 5 years. WR coach, OL coach, and "QB guru/analyst." Correct? I don't think anyone would argue otherwise. One of the 3 is black, the other two are white. How were they treated? The black got unceremoniously fired. The other two failed coaches have been routinely lavished with praise by Kirk. While firing the WR coach was warranted, it leads the question...how do you fire the WR coach but keep the underperforming OL coach (who had far more talent and experience to work with yet was clearly the weak link on staff)? More perplexing, how do you not only keep, but promote & double the salary of the "QB guru" who was oversaw Petras' senior year and Deacon Hill? Kirk promoted him to WR coach despite never coaching the position or having any track record of improving position group performance.

Iowa already had the whitest, small-town coaching staff in the Power 5. Check out the makeup of the other coaching staffs in the Big 10 and you'll see. Blame it on demographics, fine. Yet when Iowa's OC position opened up this fall, Kirk didn't bother to interview a black candidate. When the WR coach position opened up (a position where 95% of the players are black), not a single black coach was interviewed. Maybe that's a coincidence? Maybe Kirk has never had a black coordinator in his coaching career?

By using the offseason to: (i) replace two outgoing coaches with white guys; (ii) limiting internal promotions to white guys only; and (iii) keeping the underperforming white coaches on staff while firing the black one, is Kirk showing his true colors?

How about using young TEnds who have good speed as WRs?

I remember when Joe Pa retired and one of the seasons after that Bill O'Brien the head coach had several tall, lean TEnds playing a lot , splitting them out making mismatches on on shorter dbacks. Those TEnds really gave PSU a really good jump ball type passing game.

With a couple new TEnds coming in who probably havent bulked up in weight yet and if they have decent speed maybe they could also add to the passing game more as WRs. Work every receiver to get the most efficient passing game.

Lachey and Ostrenga are the two main TEnds but some of the others could help more with the WR position routes.

And really I hope KalebB and SethA improve a lot and are in great shape so they can just stay in the game most of the time.

20th Annual Big Ten Pick'em Contest (post entries here)

Hard to believe 20th already.
Here it is. Post your picks in this thread. I will tally and post the results the following Monday.
1. Pick the top 3 placers (1 point for each of the 3, 2 point for the champion, 1 point for runner up)
2. No more than 6 #1 seeds can be selected to win.
3. No more than 6 #2 seeds can be selected to win
4. Only 8 #1 and only 8 #2 seeds can be selected top 3
5. Select top 5 teams in order (5 points for #1 pick, 3 for #2 pick, 3 for #3 pick. i additional point for each of the top 5 picked in the top 5)
6. Select OW - 2 points. Total team points scored is the basis - highest score.
7. Select winning team score - within 5, 5 points. Within 1, 5 additional points
8. Select each Hawk's placement for each weight. 3 points spot on, 2 one off, and 1 point two spots off. Place it on same single weight class line (options are 1st - 8th or DNP). Redundancy not necessary (#2 Lee, #1 Suranno, Tomato) No need to mention Lee twice.
9. Keep each weight class on single line with top 2 seeds identified (see example in point #8)
10. All entries can be edited up until 10 pm CST Friday night
EXAMPLE
125- (1) Simmons MSU Ott ILL (2)Velez NW (Charlie Flack - 4)
133- Jayne ILL (2) Clum WIS Rieter MINN (Ramos - 6)
141- (2) Simmons MSU (1) Tsirtsis UI Churella MICH
Iowa 126, MN, MICH, tOSU, Ill
OW - Metcalf

*** GAME THREAD: #3 Iowa WBB vs Penn State (Big Ten Tournament) ***

WHO: Penn State Lady Lions (18-11 overall, 9-9 Big Ten)
WHEN: 5:30 PM CT (Friday, March 8)
WHERE: Target Center (Minneapolis, Minnesota)
TV: Big Ten Network
RADIO: Hawkeye Radio Network
ONLINE: https://www.foxsports.com/live
MOBILE: https://www.foxsports.com/live
FOLLOW: @IowaAwesome | @IowaWBB | @IowaonBTN

Penn State advanced to the Big Ten Tournament quarterfinals, defeating Wisconsin 80-56 on Thursday. The game wasn't particularly close most of the way. Penn State led by 12 after the first quarter, led by 16 at halftime, and lead by 20 heading to the fourth.

The Lady Lions' season has largely been defined by injuries. They started the year 10-5 and didn't look particularly impressive. Then star guard Ashley Owusu returned from injury, and Penn State looked much better. The Lions went 6-1 over the next seven games and looked like they should easily make the NCAA Tournament.

Unfortunately, starter Taylor Valladay was injured late in that stretch and is now out for the season. Valladay wasn't Penn State's best player -- she averaged 11.5 ppg, 2.2 rpg, 2.3 apg -- but the Lady Lions have fallen off without her, going just 3-5 in the last eight games.
The net result of those ups and downs has made Penn State a team squarely on the NCAA Tournament bubble. ESPN had Penn State as one of the First Four Teams Out of the Tournament in its March 4th Bracketology. It's possible that Penn State needs a win over Iowa to make the NCAA Tournament field.

MORE HERE:

  • Poll
Human Centipede Situation

Whose in front and whose in back?

  • MTG in front, AOC in back

  • AOC in front, MTG in back


Results are only viewable after voting.

So you fall asleep in a daze while watching the SOTU and wake up in a dirty labrtory. The doc says you've signed away your rights to being in a human centiped, but at least he's gracious enough to let you choose who you want to be in front of and be behind but unfortunately for you, you're stuck in the middle. Which are you choosing?

marjorie-taylor-greene-state-union.jpg
hbz-aoc-sotu-gettyimages-1094200398.jpg

Expelled congressman George Santos plans another House bid

Expelled New York Republican congressman George Santos said he will again run for office, this time against one of the Republicans who helped oust him in a historic, bipartisan congressional vote last year.

Cut through the 2024 election noise. Get The Campaign Moment newsletter.

Paperwork filed with the Federal Election Commission on Thursday indicates Santos will run for the Republican-leaning 1st Congressional District, a suburban seat in Suffolk, Long Island, represented by Rep. Nick LaLota (R). That district is farther east and more Republican-leaning than the nearby district that elected Santos in 2022.

The House voted to expel Santos in December — an action the chamber had previously taken only five times in U.S. history, and not for more than 20 years — in response to an array of alleged crimes and ethical lapses that came to light after the freshman lawmaker was found to have fabricated key parts of his biography.



The vote followed the release of a House Ethics Committee report that accused Santos of an array of misconduct, including stealing money from his campaign, deceiving donors about how contributions would be used, creating fictitious loans and engaging in fraudulent business dealings. Santos, the report alleges, spent hefty sums on personal enrichment, including visits to spas and casinos, shopping trips to high-end stores, and payments to a subscription site that contains adult content. Santos, who has denied wrongdoing, also faces 23 federal criminal counts, including fraud, money laundering, falsifying records and aggravated identity theft. He pleaded not guilty to those charges.

After Santos was expelled, Democrat Tom Suozzi won a special election to the seat in New York’s 3rd Congressional District, which he held for three terms before giving it up to run for governor.
Santos mocked LaLota and other Republican colleagues for the GOP’s loss in the special election and shrinking the party’s already narrow majority in the House.





http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=mc_magnet-george-santos_inline_collection_20

A voice message left on Santos’s cellphone Thursday night and an email sent to the person listed as his campaign treasurer were not immediately returned.
“To raise the standard in Congress, and to hold a pathological liar who stole an election accountable, I led the charge to expel George Santos,” LaLota said in a statement posted on X, which included a link to donate to his campaign. “If finishing the job requires beating him in a primary, count me in.”
Former CNN host John Avlon is among the Democrats running for the 1st Congressional District and welcomed the chance to face Santos in a social media post.
“Looks like the circus just came to NY-01,” Avlon wrote on X. “George Santos filed to primary Nick LaLota. Whatever the result — serial liar or Trump flunky — my response is the same: Bring It On.”



Santos’s filing came as he made a surprise visit to the Capitol where his former colleagues were gathered for President Biden’s State of the Union address. As a former House member, Santos retains certain privileges, including access to the House floor. Republican House staffers at one point before Biden’s speech asked Santos to move from the seat he had taken and to stand in the back to make room for current members, according to a CNN report.
After his historic expulsion, Santos attempted to cash in on his infamy. He opened an account on Cameo and quickly earned “six figures” by making short personalized videos for a fee, Semafor reported. As of Thursday night, Santos’s rate for a video was $350.

  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: nu2u and TC Nole OX

Women’s Big Ten Tourney tickets (for sale)

I’m not seeing a ticket exchange post on here, so I’m starting one up, I can’t make Sunday’s game for family reasons and I have 4 GA tickets I’m looking to offload, anyone interested? I’ve also listed them for sale through the ticket app, but don’t know how well that works. Looking for $300 for all four of them, not looking to make a profit just recoup some of my costs for the all session pass. I’ve seen other people looking to offload theirs for $200/seat which is ridiculous.

Final Seeds + Bracket for 2024 Big Ten Wrestling Tournament

Brackets set for 2024 Big Ten Wrestling Tournament.


No changes in seeding from the pre-seeds for any Iowa wrestlers.

125 -- (2) Drake Ayala -- BYE in Rd 1
133 -- (14) Brody Teske vs (3) Nic Bouzakis (OSU) in Rd 1
141 -- (3) Real Woods vs (14) Felix Lettini (WIS) in Rd 1
149 -- (3) Caleb Rathjen vs (14) Jake Harrier (ILL) in Rd 1
157 -- (4) Jared Franek vs (13) Luke Mechler (WIS) in Rd 1
165 -- (3) Michael Caliendo vs (14) AJ Rodrigues (MD) in Rd 1
174 -- (3) Patrick Kennedy vs (14) David Ferrante (NW) in Rd 1
184 -- (13) Aiden Riggins vs (4) Ryder Rogotzke (OSU) in Rd 1
197 -- (3) Zach Glazier vs (14) Josh Otto (WIS) in Rd 1
285 -- (7) Bradley Hill vs (10) Nash Hutmacher (NEB) in Rd 1

Supreme Court sets Trump immunity claim in D.C. trial for April 25

The Supreme Court has scheduled argument for April 25 to review Donald Trump’s claim that he is immune from criminal prosecution on charges of trying to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
The case will be heard on the final day of the court’s argument calendar and will determine whether and how quickly Trump faces trial in D.C. for allegedly trying to block Joe Biden’s election victory. The high court’s decision to consider Trump’s claims, rather than letting stand a lower court decision that he can be prosecuted, drew criticism for further delaying the election obstruction trial. It was originally scheduled to begin this week.


Cut through the 2024 election noise. Get The Campaign Moment newsletter.

The former president, who is on the cusp of securing the 2024 Republican nomination, has tried to push the D.C. trial and others he faces until after the general election. If Trump is reelected, he could try to order the Justice Department to drop the federal charges against him. In addition, it is Justice Department policy not to prosecute a sitting president.
Sign up for the Trump Trials, our weekly newsletter on the former president's criminal cases
Last week, the justices announced their plans to consider the unanimous ruling from a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, which rejected Trump’s sweeping assertion of immunity from prosecution. On Wednesday, the court set oral argument for April 25, adding another day to its calendar.

How the Supreme Court helps Trump by taking up his case
1:20

The Supreme Court's decision to hear former president Donald Trump's immunity case increases the chances his federal trial is pushed close to the 2024 election. (Video: JM Rieger/The Washington Post, Photo: Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)
Trump’s pretrial proceedings in D.C. remain on hold until a ruling is issued. The high court could decide the matter at any time after argument and almost certainly will do so before its term ends in late June or early July, most likely pushing any D.C. trial into the second half of the summer or the fall.



The justices have shown they can move quickly. They took less than a month to issue a unanimous ruling Monday that keeps Trump on the ballot and reverses a Colorado opinion that disqualified him from returning to office.

Whatever the court decides in the D.C. immunity case could also have implications for Trump’s other legal troubles. Trump, who has pleaded not guilty in all four of his criminal cases, has raised immunity issues in his federal case in Florida, where he is charged with illegally retaining classified materials after he left the White House and obstructing government efforts to retrieve them.
Trump has also brought up the issue of presidential immunity in Georgia, where he faces state charges for allegedly participating in a massive conspiracy to undo the 2020 election results in that state.
His fourth indictment comes from New York, where he is scheduled for trial starting later this month on charges of falsifying business records to cover up a hush money payment to an adult-film star during the 2016 election. It will be the first criminal trial of a former president — and the first criminal trial of a leading presidential candidate.

'Secretly flown' 320,000 illegal immigrants lie - since mods closed the other one

More context for those taken in by the disinformation:

Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media
Rather inexplicable that the mods here close threads and prevent context from being provided, rather than correct that content and ban the posters individually....

Dog Sledder Penalized for Poor Moose Gutting

It’s been a tough Iditarod sled dog race for the five-time winner Dallas Seavey.
First, his dogs became entangled with a moose, leaving one of the dogs injured. Then, he shot the moose. And then, by race rules, he had to stop the sled to gut the moose.
But it seems a desultory moose-gutting just won’t do. You have to get in there and really gut that moose. Seavey, officials determined, did not.
Yes, it’s true: Seavey faces a two-hour penalty in the world’s biggest sled dog race for not gutting a moose well enough.
The Iditarod is indeed a different kind of sporting event.
The story started with the moose encounter near Skwentna, Alaska, that was reported by race officials early Monday. The injured dog, Faloo, was flown to Anchorage in critical condition and underwent surgery.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


“With the well-being of his team in mind, Dallas made the tough decision to fell the moose,” said a statement on his Facebook page. Sledders are permitted to carry firearms for just such an eventuality.
“It was on a downhill,” Seavey said in a video posted by Iditarod Insider. “It fell on my sled. It sprawled.”
The rules of the Iditarod, the annual race that stretches roughly 1,000 miles across Alaska, state: “In the event that an edible big game animal, i.e., moose, caribou, buffalo, is killed in defense of life or property, the musher must gut the animal.”

It can turn into a community effort: “Following teams must help gut the animal when possible. No teams may pass until the animal has been gutted.”
The rules are in place so that the meat of the animal can be salvaged and something positive can come from the death. Race organizers said the meat had been processed and was being distributed.

Editors’ Picks​


It Just Got Easier to Visit a Vanishing Glacier. Is That a Good Thing?​



Meet the Artist Delighting Amsterdam​



Sarayu Blue Is Pristine on ‘Expats’ but ‘Such a Little Weirdo’ IRL​


SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


Unfortunately, Seavey’s effort did not make the grade. “The animal was not sufficiently gutted by the musher,” race organizers said. He spent roughly 10 minutes at the site, the race said in a statement. It helpfully added a definition of “gutting” for city slickers: “Taking out the intestines and other internal organs of (a fish or other animal) before cooking it.”
In addition, the moose caused problems for some of the subsequent racers: “It’s dead in the middle of the trail,” the musher Paige Drobny said. “My team went up and over it.” Another musher, Jessie Holmes, told other racers he had punched a moose in the area where Seavey had his encounter, according to Seavey’s Facebook page. It was unclear whether it was the same moose.
A three-person panel, presumably stocked with experts in the art of gutting, determined unanimously that, as a penalty, Seavey would have to extend the mandatory 24-hour rest that all mushers take to 26 hours.
“Dallas will be evaluating and strategizing for the next portion of the race in spite of the difficulties,” his Facebook page said.
Image
A man in a winter coat and white racing bib riding a sled pulled by several dogs in front of a group of people watching from behind a fence.

Seavey was leading the Iditarod at the midway point of this year’s race. Credit...Kerry Tasker/Reuters
“I gutted it as best I could, but it was ugly,” Seavey confessed in the video interview. “You don’t want a picture of that in your hunting collection.”
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


Now that’s (sorry) mush ado about gutting.
Iditarod officials did not respond to a request for comment on the specifics of how Seavey’s gutting skills fell short. Seavey, meanwhile, was out on the trail and, moose or no, led the race as of Thursday morning local time. The race, which started Sunday, was expected go on for four or five more days.
Seavey was also the top racer at the halfway point. As a prize, he can choose either a smartphone or $3,000 in gold nuggets.
And now the news you’ve waded through all that gutting talk for: After surgery, Faloo, the injured dog, has been cleared to come home.
  • Like
Reactions: Moral

SOTU opinion no one asked for

First, not a Biden nor a Trump fan.

But, I agree the war in Ukraine is vital for US and our allies’ interests. And I agree we are at an inflection point generationally which coincides with an important election.

I totally understand the SOTU is kabuki theater for the media to serve up slop to their viewers (on both sides)…so my expectations were already very low.

All that said, I think Biden missed a real golden opportunity last night by not expounding on Ukraine / Russia and properly laying it all out for the American people. He spent more time on IVF and ribbing the Republicans than talking about WHY we need success in Eastern Europe.

It could have been Biden’s “city on a hill” moment. Instead, Ukraine felt more like a bullet point in an obvious campaign speech.

Missed opportunity. That is all. CSB & my mom is hungry & waiting.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT