5 that is your total arguing point, that on the field performance is the overall deciding factor. ISU brings nothing to the table in football according to Iowa fans, because they are horrible at football. That is what I keep reading here, I am saying that attendance, is just as important, and academics is even more important. If the 64 team conference deal happens, there will be very few sure home runs, Texas, Oklahoma and maybe ND if they choose to go the route. Everyone else will have pluses and minuses. ISU's pluses will be enough to make the grade. Believe, don't believe, I could care less. I am never going to change you opinion on the topic, just like you will not change mine. But I can guarantee you this, if I am wrong, I will come back and admit it, something I have never seen you do, in 6 years of watching this site.
Football is of primary importance. I stand by that. Period. For anyone to think/believe differently is to deny the inevitable.
You keep throwing out this mythical 'table' where isu is destined to have a seat. Think about it. People, whether they be ADs or Presidents/Chancellors will be discussing the relative merits of reorganizing/realigning major college football. Your premise is that football will be way down the list, at best, in determining the fate of many of these 'on the bubble' schools.
Football brings the necessary revenues to the institutions. Like it or not that is what has evolved out of this metamorphosis of college athletics. It will behoove whomever is making the decision to look at what is best for the majority going forward. Team 'A' has very little football tradition, has never won a divisional let alone conference championship (well, since sharing the MVC title of 1912 at least), has never appeared in a truly major bowl game, only has played in twelve bowls ever and worse even yet has only won three times, has beer ranked at the conclusion of the season two or three times ever and has changed coaches more frequently than many over the past decade with no obvious change in results. Team 'B' is in a more fertile market in terms of geography, travel distance, state population, market share distribution - any number of factors
AND has better performance in titles won or shared, appearance and/or success in bowls, national rankings, stability of coaching/staffing.... which team gets preference when it comes time to say who is in and who is out?
Attendance? How many times did the number three (in terms of relative size within the big xii) sell out the venue in 2015? Did isu finish as the third best in attendance even in the conference last season? No. Why not and more importantly why was there such a need to build for 61,500 if the demand was not even close to that on a more consistent basis? isu has nothing to brag about when it comes to attendance.
Come back? Do you want to be totally honest and state what screen names you previously posted under here prior to being banned? Or, like others, will you lie and say that you only joined the sight for the very first time
yesterday and that you have never posted here before that?