Jeff, may I ask why you think this?
ACC takes UCONN and their 28,288 per game average, South Florida and their 30, 065 per game average. I may see UCONN to get the tv market, its 3.6 million, but what does S. Florida bring to the table, the conference all ready has Florida State, so they would not be able to charge more, why take them?
SEC takes OU, could happen, and maybe they take Okie State as the package deal, but what does Tech provide, no new tv sets, they already have Texas AM.
Pac 12 Boise 33,612 last year, horrible academics, BYU, great attendance, good academics, but they already have Utah in the conference, again, no new tv will be added. TCU and BU, great academics, new tv market, but you do not need both, and they are private schools. None of the other Pac 12 schools are private, would the pac 12 want that, and if so, why take both when one school brings in all the tv in texas. Tech will never get into the Pac 12, low academics. Texas, the other big fish here, do they want to travel out to the west coast for half their games, they have said they will not give up the LHN, so does the conference allow it or buy them out?
Big 10, the dream of ND continues, even after they have repeatedly said they are not interested in joining a conference that forces them to give up the tv deal with NBC or does the league allow them to keep it? Kansas would jump at the chance to join the league, but will their BOR allow it, knowing that K state would be left out? The governor of the state is a K state grad. Kansas also has great bb but football is horrible, they average 27,000 a game last year and you are only getting another 2.9 million tv sets.
So in the end the schools left out are for sure ISU, K state, W. Virginia and two of the following, O State, TCU, Tech or Baylor. All the school listed had football attendance of more than 15 to 20 thousand more than UCONN and S. Florida.