Good points.
But it really depends on how you measure things, right? All men’s teams make more than women’s teams, regardless of the coach. So Fran is starting with a huge advantage not due to his own work.
To measure and compare Bluder and Fran, you really need to look at the marginal changes in revenue that they were responsible for. Men’s attendance has fallen significantly under Fran the past few years, while the women’s numbers have increased under Bluder. You really can’t give Fran any credit for TV money, that’s going to be there no matter what. And Bluder has brought immense goodwill to the university with her success, which isn’t easily measured in $.
It’s an interesting argument on both sides. Bluder definitely should get a raise.
The women’s program is already losing millions per year. Attendance and revenue are likely to take a significant hit over the next 2-3 years, so how much more should we pay?
Again, I love Lisa but we have to keep it real and in perspective.