@PinDoxRico - Friendly unsolicited advice, don't say anything.Brands is out for a while with a surgery. Car accident last night.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@PinDoxRico - Friendly unsolicited advice, don't say anything.Brands is out for a while with a surgery. Car accident last night.
I think they could score big at 141 with Bartlett. I don't think he's great, but that weight is garbage. Like the worst I've seen in a long time. They could also score at 157 if they roll out Haines. I don't think that's a great weight either. I don't think either is elite right now. It's more about the composition of the weights.Certainly they will be rolling out top recruits at 141, 149, 157, and 165. That being said, until I see something different, I do not see many points at NCAAs out of any of these weights.
I agree but things can certainly change. I think Hawks were considered in drivers seat by most last year to repeat until they weren't.Hate to say it, but PSU with their 4 returning champs are firmly in the driver's seat
I don't know about big, but I could see Bartlett somewhere from 5th-8th. Woods and Matthews are legit. Hart is going to be really good. After that, I still think highly of Alirez and Carlson. The big test will be how Bartlett does against Bergeland and D'Emilio. Those 2 are probably the gatekeeper types in the R12 matches to make AA.I think they could score big at 141 with Bartlett. I don't think he's great, but that weight is garbage. Like the worst I've seen in a long time. They could also score at 157 if they roll out Haines. I don't think that's a great weight either. I don't think either is elite right now. It's more about the composition of the weights.
Yeah, not mentioned much but that stood out to me as well. Brands goes on and on about Spencer in March and then boom at the end we love Bradley Hill. So randomLee, Warner, Cassioppi, Woods...and Bradley Hill.
Yeah, not mentioned much but that stood out to me as well. Brands goes on and on about Spencer in March and then boom at the end we love Bradley Hill. So random
Yo… I call garbage can…Wait...what? The linked article isn't a Tom Brands interview with a chronological order of his comments. It's an article about an event in the Quad Cities. His statements are intertwined with commentary and info on the upcoming season. Hill is from the QC so it only stands to reason that he was part of the discussion at some point at this event. If you have an issue, it's with Steve Batterson not Tom Brands. And really, there was nothing random at all about the Hill comments.
This shouldn't have to be explained to anyone. I feel like I'm on Sesame Street.
Ha nothing really to say about this other than if true, I hope he recovers ok. I’ve been in a scary car accident before. I had a teammate who developed schizophrenia in college and he went from one of the most popular guys at school to irrational and delusional in a matter of what seemed like weeks and I was one of the only teammates who didn’t start ostracizing him because I’ll be honest… he’s the one person I’ve ever met who terrified me. You don’t mess with crazy. Anyways, one time I was riding with him to my friend’s house and he had an episode and drove his little car straight into a bluff at 90 MPH with me in the passenger seat and it scrunched the entire front of the car almost to the seats. Somehow I had a tiny cut on my elbow. He had no injuries. Some…how.@PinDoxRico - Friendly unsolicited advice, don't say anything.
Thanks for catering to the lazy, casual, unintuitive wrestling fans. They couldn't be expected to figure it out on their own.Wait...what? The linked article isn't a Tom Brands interview with a chronological order of his comments. It's an article about an event in the Quad Cities. His statements are intertwined with commentary and info on the upcoming season. Hill is from the QC so it only stands to reason that he was part of the discussion at some point at this event. If you have an issue, it's with Steve Batterson not Tom Brands. And really, there was nothing random at all about the Hill comments.
This shouldn't have to be explained to anyone. I feel like I'm on Sesame Street.
Agreed. Had a brother-in-law who suffered. Cycled between staying on medication and not liking the way the meds made him feel. It's hard on the schizophrenic and those close to them.schizophrenia
I can attest to that. Was almost killed by a driver via head-on, because he took a left at high speed and lost his Maxima's rear end. All because he was in a hurry and didn't want to slow down and yield the right away.Getting into a car accident is awful
The guy was trolling you. You've done your penance. I would've kept my keyboard silent.wrote something like, “karma for what the Brands pulled on Swafford last year.”
Sometimes when I try to be quiet I get so frustrated that I feel like my mouth is gonna fall off! 😆 It’s a task for me.Agreed. Had a brother-in-law who suffered. Cycled between staying on medication and not liking the way the meds made him feel. It's hard on the schizophrenic and those close to them.
I can attest to that. Was almost killed by a driver via head-on, because he took a left at high speed and lost his Maxima's rear end. All because he was in a hurry and didn't want to slow down and yield the right away.
The guy was trolling you. You've done your penance. I would've kept my keyboard silent.
Reason for responding is that I just wanted to nip that narrative in the bud or butt or whatever the saying is because I know how fast negativity can spread once people start piling on…. Haha so it was kinda like a, “just so everything is clear… there’s no problem here” type of thing.Agreed. Had a brother-in-law who suffered. Cycled between staying on medication and not liking the way the meds made him feel. It's hard on the schizophrenic and those close to them.
I can attest to that. Was almost killed by a driver via head-on, because he took a left at high speed and lost his Maxima's rear end. All because he was in a hurry and didn't want to slow down and yield the right away.
The guy was trolling you. You've done your penance. I would've kept my keyboard silent.
It's "in the bud."in the bud or butt
Yeah that always confused me because why would you wanna nip the inside of a butt? Youknowutimsayn?It's "in the bud."
"In the butt" is something else all together.
Thanks for catering to the lazy, casual, unintuitive wrestling fans. They couldn't be expected to figure it out on their own.
I saw you on there once. Weren't you the one with the apron and hatchet chasing the chicken?Wait...what? The linked article isn't a Tom Brands interview with a chronological order of his comments. It's an article about an event in the Quad Cities. His statements are intertwined with commentary and info on the upcoming season. Hill is from the QC so it only stands to reason that he was part of the discussion at some point at this event. If you have an issue, it's with Steve Batterson not Tom Brands. And really, there was nothing random at all about the Hill comments.
This shouldn't have to be explained to anyone. I feel like I'm on Sesame Street.
there will be no damned optimism on this board!!I'm ok with an optimistic view 😁
do we know Stevenson isn’t wrestling this year?It would appear that the HAWKS have more potential to improve their point total over the kitties. F*** st has a lot of fire power coming back for sure, but the 4 champions have no where to go but down, and honestly besides Brooks, I could see them all falling. now before the bandwagon F*** guys start wetting their panties. I am not saying it will happen.
After their 4 champions, they have Kerk Hvy, howierd 125 as somewhat known commodities. I do not feel 125 will get them much of anything. Certainly they will be rolling out top recruits at 141, 149, 157, and 165. That being said, until I see something different, I do not see many points at NCAAs out of any of these weights.
Besides LEE, everyone/weight has a chance to improve the current predicted points(Lee could MAX out)!
I feel 133 will be a weight that will score better.
Woods at 141 could win it
149 I like what MSU wrote
157 lets hope someone breaks out
165 Kennedy should add a good amount and I believe more then most are giving
174 Brands should add some points and has a good shot at AA if he can stay healthy
184 Assad see above
197 Warner is right there, can he make the final step and become a champion.
HVY, Big Cass Can win! Without Stevenson This weight goes to whomever out of the top 4 puts it all together.
The other guys currently have more proven studs. They have also shown over the years that they can perform at the big dance and they can and will add the pieces they need to win.
IOWA has to regain their edge and have several guys jump levels. They have so many guy who could/should do this. Season can not start soon enough!!!
GO HAWKS
I saw you on there once. Weren't you the one with the apron and hatchet chasing the chicken?
It's "in the bud."
"In the butt" is something else all together.
PSU has scored more than that in 4 of the last 5 NCAA tournaments.Actually, that is well over 120 points based on reasonable bonus projections for those placements. If they score that, they have a pretty decent chance to win it all. Add an extra 4 for Warner and they would almost assuredly score well over 120 in that hypothetical and PSU doesn't really project for much more than that as of now...
Just using those projected placements:
125: 1st. With it being Lee here, I would say 26 is conservative
133: DNP Being that either guy should be top 15ish, 2 points is fair.
141: 1st. Woods isn't too much of a bonus guy, so lets say 22.
149: 6th You get 6 just for taking 6th. So let's say he goes 4-3, winning 2 on the front and 2 on the back to take 6th. Give him 1 bonus on the front and 1 on the back. That is 11 total points with 3 advancement and 2 bonus.
157: ZERO
165: 8th Even as deep as this weight is he should get first round killing of someone and 1 in wrestle backs. So that is 3 for 8th, plus 2.5 advancement and 2 bonus. So, lets say 7.5
174: 8th I would say 1 less bonus from Nelson, so 6.5
184: 6th Say the same as Murin. 11
197: 2nd Jacob isn't much for bonus, so I would say 17 for 2nd and 21 if he gets that "must take" 1st.
285: 1st If Cass were actually able to win it all, I think he would get a couple pins early, but no bonus after that so 24
So, that is 127-131 based on those predictions with, what I at least think is very reasonable bonus points. If they score that, PSU will need to damn near be perfect to win...
Predicted AA finishes by FLO rankings:
Iowa - 1, 2, 2, 4, 7
PSU - 1, 1, 1, 1, 2
Iowa has only 1 projected champ, Lee, who is coming off some significant bilateral knee surgery. Cass and Warner both underdogs to PSU as of now.
All 4 of PSU's returning champs are favorites to repeat - RBY, Brooks, Starocci and Dean. Lots of bonus coming from them as well. Kerkvliet a good shot at 2nd.
Iowa would need lots of bonus and some upsets, if they're to have a chance.
Lots of bonus? QUick math in my head has them at a total of 9.5 between them last year.Predicted AA finishes by FLO rankings:
Iowa - 1, 2, 2, 4, 7
PSU - 1, 1, 1, 1, 2
Iowa has only 1 projected champ, Lee, who is coming off some significant bilateral knee surgery. Cass and Warner both underdogs to PSU as of now.
All 4 of PSU's returning champs are favorites to repeat - RBY, Brooks, Starocci and Dean. Lots of bonus coming from them as well. Kerkvliet a good shot at 2nd.
Iowa would need lots of bonus and some upsets, if they're to have a chance.
Cool stat, bro. However, what in the hell does that have to do with anything I said? The point I made was that the Iowa scoring should be solidly in the 120's, if they match the prediction I quoted. PSU DOES NOT project higher than that as of now, THIS SEASON.PSU has scored more than that in 4 of the last 5 NCAA tournaments.
So, back to four in finals with three winning it all?Cool stat, bro. However, what in the hell does that have to do with anything I said? The point I made was that the Iowa scoring should be solidly in the 120's, if they match the prediction I quoted. PSU DOES NOT project higher than that as of now, THIS SEASON.
Even if you wanted to use your argument, they scored 131.5 last season and LOSE Nick Lee. Getting to that number will be very difficult this year since Starocci, RBY, Brooks and Dean will have to be perfect to basically match their totals from last year. If Gable is truly coming back, Kerk will also have a hard time scoring anything more than what he did last year. So, that leaves Howard, Bartlett, Van Ness, Haines?(I would be surprised if he goes) and Facundo to have to pick up the 26.5 to get to that number when Lee scored 23 of those himself last season.
Just to show you how hard it will be for them to match that number from last season:
125-Hildebrandt .5
133-RBY 23
141-Lee 23
149-Bartlett 1
157-Berge 2
165-0
174-Starocci 22
184-Brooks 23
197-Dean 21.5
285-Kerkvliet 15.5
As good as they are, who in their right mind would take the over for RBY, Starocci, Brooks, Dean and Kerkvliet at 105???? If Gable is wrestling, it would only take 1 of the 4 not repeating to almost guarantee they don't match last years numbers. With that said, I expect PSU to be around 120 and win, since I don't see Iowa matching the quoted prediction. However, if Iowa does score over 120, I would say they almost certainly win...
Huh? You need to be a bit more specific. The prediction(which I didn't make), had Iowa with 4 in the Finals and 3 champs. The post I made that you just quoted, had 4 PSU guys in the Finals and said they are very unlikely to match last year's total if 1 of the 4 doesn't repeat.So, back to four in finals with three winning it all?
STFU.Huh? You need to be a bit more specific. The prediction(which I didn't make), had Iowa with 4 in the Finals and 3 champs. The post I made that you just quoted, had 4 PSU guys in the Finals and said they are very unlikely to match last year's total if 1 of the 4 doesn't repeat.
On top of all that, I said I don't see Iowa matching the prediction and think PSU wins with about 120 points or so. So, again, what are you actually trying to say???
Yeah, but rankings are not predictions or projections. So what's the real point? It's just a bunch of mathematical masterbation this early in the season. And, I'll trust Intermat's TPI before yours.PSU DOES NOT project higher than that as of now, THIS SEASON.
I felt the need to be positive was important.Was GFY taken?
What is "far exceed"? I would be happy to make a bet with you if you quantify it...Yeah, but rankings are not predictions or projections. So what's the real point? It's just a bunch of mathematical masterbation this early in the season. And, I'll trust Intermat's TPI before yours.
Barring injuries, PSU should far exceed 120 this year when 125, 141, 149 and 165 (and 157 if Haines goes) score above their current rankings' advancement and placement points.
Not my fault your response didn't make 1 lick of sense. But, feel free to be you...STFU.
What are you saying?What is "far exceed"? I would be happy to make a bet with you if you quantify it...
You were the one that specifically said. "far exceed". I said PSU should score about 120 or so. So, OBVIOUSLY, it would only behoove me to make a bet if you actually quantify "far exceed"....What are you saying?
How many points PSU will score above 120, or how many points the collection of starting wrestlers will score above their current Intermat TPI number?
And why should it be anything greater than even, since you're so confident in your assessment?
Speaking of your assessments, what are you giving on Michigan's constitution referendum?