Close friend pleading with me to not vaccinate our baby
- Thread starter HawkeyesAndCubs1023
- Start date
No, it's the truthful thing to say.
It's aluminum! No, it's aluminum and thimerosal...SYNERGY! Oh...no...it's aluminum and thimerosal (even though there is no thimerosal anymore) and changes in diet and environment.
The essay posted earlier captures you guys perfectly. It will ALWAYS be vaccines - you're too invested in it now.
OP... google Rochester, MN. And people being kept out of grade school b cuz they didn't have their inoculations.
You're really chasing the wind at this point. Let's focus on what happened here. The cornerstone safety studies you and JP were so proud of touting ended up being nothing but complete fraudulent garbage. You got your legs swiped completely out from under you and you're left with nothing but junk posts like the one above. Even your essay is nothing but complete garbage and gives you no redeeming value for vaccine safety. Hime wants to know whether or not vaccines are safe for his baby and if he's been following closely I think he has his answer.
Seven freaking pages on this ridiculous thread, HROT? Really???
LOL...you think you saying it makes it true. That's your entire problem in a nutshell. Hime had his answer on page 1. You declaring "victory" is laughable. I just like watching you become more desperate page after page.
I think I'm just going to park this right here. Vaccine safety 180 / take down by world renowned Vaccinologist, et. al.
Enjoy.
Enjoy.
This is not at all what the NEJM paper says.I think I'm just going to park this right here. Vaccine safety 180 / take down by world renowned Vaccinologist, et. al.
Enjoy.
We did all the vaccines our Dr. Recommended, and didn't do one where he said meh, it's probably not important and some kids have some pretty ugly temporary side effects.
Our kids have been fine and they're 9 and 11 now.
Our kids have been fine and they're 9 and 11 now.
Last edited:
There's 0% chance you actually read the editorial the moron from Twitter posted. Because it isn't remotely close to a "Vaccine safety 180 / take down by world renowned Vaccinologist".
If you can't access it, good. I pay for it. You can, too.
Now which one of you is going to tell me that the bold quoted portions of Siri's post, particularly where it notes the safety science is lacking, was not included in the paper?
Last edited:
Guess you just better pay to read it and see for yourself. Pretty damn ignorant to run here and post some idiot's highly biased and inaccurate interpretation of it before reading it yourself, isn't it?
This is why no one takes you seriously. And also why you believe the dumb things you do.
Last edited:
Oh that's really fug'n rich coming from the (supposed) resident HBOT MD who urges people on a regular basis to NOT do their own research and just trust their doctor's opinion and recommendations.
Now, resident HBOT MD, tell me your big take away after reading that analysis was that they felt the vaccine safety science was wholly and 100% adequate.
I've literally never urged people to not do some research. Not once. But people should use legitimate sources (read-not biased ambulance chasers on Twitter) and then discuss further with their doctors. Most people don't have the knowledge background to truly interpret the data.
You're flailing. As usual.
You haven't read it. There's nothing to discuss until you do.
But that's not what they said. At all.
I and others have posted so many studies here indicating signals with the authors urging more science needs to be done to address their safety concerns.
I received 6 covid vaccines. Fully injected. No side effects besides a sore arm.
I asked 5 doctors I know and trust and they all recommended the vaccines.
I'm going to get vaccine #7 in October just for you @naturalbornhawk
I asked 5 doctors I know and trust and they all recommended the vaccines.
I'm going to get vaccine #7 in October just for you @naturalbornhawk
Translation: You didn't come away with the impression the safety science was adequate.
Change the discussion when called out with your pants down. Flailing.
Nope. Maybe read it? That way you might educate yourself before continuing to proudly espouse your ignorance.
In the other thread I was asked if I knew anyone that was significantly impacted by the COVID vaccines and I came up with one, then added another, my best friend from high school who is 48 yrs old with a blood clot in his lung, was vaccinated and boosted. His Doctor said it was dangerously close to a widow maker. Blood thinners for life.
I need to add another now. A guy I work with in his lower 40's, blood clot last week, and will spend the rest of his life on blood thinners. Do what you will my man.
I’m getting my booster, too. But not for him but for me!
Vaccines are still overwhelmingly safe and effective.
That was very relevant to your post that I quoted, because those studies WERE from legitimate sources. It doesn't surprise me though that you weren't able to connect those dots.
That's now one of the most controversial topics today. Everyone gets their own opinion. Think what you want.
You misinterpret most of the studies you post. And pages are spent trying to educate you. Seems to be a pattern.
That's a bit of a conflict then isn't it? Sorry but when people do indeed do their own research it often times does not align with doctor recommendations.
Anti-vaxxers like Natural can't die soon enough. No offense.
Not at all. Read it again. Slowly. Out loud if you have to. Sound out the big words. What I said was people should do some research from legitimate sources and discuss their questions and concerns with their doctor, an educated person trained in the stuff.
Flailing.
You mean like my best friend from high school who was vaxxed and boosted and actually almost died of a blood clot in his lungs?
People can read and understand exactly what the scientists are saying in their papers for themselves. People don't need an interpreter for "more science needs to be done" and they don't need a biased opinion from some arrogant blow-hard like yourself.
You realize there's lots of causes of blood clots, correct? You assign blame to a vaccine out of your own biases.
Actually, most people can't read the actual studies and make heads or tails of the statistics, methods, limitations, and conclusions. You prove that every time you post a study.
So you're just admitting defeat on your original post because you're too cheap to pay for a subscription and actually read the editorial? Or are you just going to look for a few more people's interpretation on Twitter?
No, it's happening a lot more nowadays among younger and vaccinated population. There is little doubt my otherwise very healthy 48 year old friend would not have almost died, spent 3 days in the hospital, and now on blood thinners if he wasn't vaccinated. Same with my co-worker. Otherwise very healthy and very young.
Now Doc, tell me it wasn't the vaccines and it's completely normal for a healthy chap in their lower 40's to have a blood clot.
Says who?
The virus is causing most of the problems, across the board. Well documented w/ long-term sequelae.
