Didn’t Ohio State’s current coach John Dibler take over as head coach part way through their season a few years ago? Did he have prior head coaching experience?I believe you need to hire a coach with head coaching experience. Gatens needs to go to a smaller school and work his way up the coaching tree!
I think MN will stick with Ben Johnson.Looks like Indiana and Minnesota will be looking for new coaches as well! Be interesting to see how all this unfolds!
You are correct! The jury is still out on how he’ll do but OSU took a risk. The players seem to want to play for him and he got the job. I’m still a believer that you need someone with a head coaching resume and a great recruiter. Unsure if Gatens fits this bill.Didn’t Ohio State’s current coach John Dibler take over as head coach part way through their season a few years ago? Did he have prior head coaching experience?
Looks that way they’ve turned it around these past 4 games!I think MN will stick with Ben Johnson.
Jake not JohnDidn’t Ohio State’s current coach John Dibler take over as head coach part way through their season a few years ago? Did he have prior head coaching experience?
However, Gaten’s (or other coaches) could emphasize defense, have better substitution patterns, call smarter time outs, etc.I’m not opposed to Gatens but this team is about the talent level. Having Gatens or any other coach will not mean our guys will jump higher or be stronger. We need more talent.
I think being a former Iowa player gives Matt more pride in the Iowa program. Fran has apparently lost his age.Gatens would be a mistake, IMO. If he wasn’t a former Iowa player you wouldn’t want him. There are much better options out there.
yes he did and no he was never a head coach (my recollection)Didn’t Ohio State’s current coach John Dibler take over as head coach part way through their season a few years ago? Did he have prior head coaching experience?
Gatens seem to be very reserved and not very vocal during a gameYou are correct! The jury is still out on how he’ll do but OSU took a risk. The players seem to want to play for him and he got the job. I’m still a believer that you need someone with a head coaching resume and a great recruiter. Unsure if Gatens fits this bill.
That may be true, but not a reason to make him head coach.I think being a former Iowa player gives Matt more pride in the Iowa program. Fran has apparently lost his age.
I don't care if they go four corners and we win 10-6. The teams that win in March aren't winning with offense.The way Drake plays bball gives me Lick era nightmares.....slow boring style
Or depressed facing million dollar starters on the big spending teams.I think being a former Iowa player gives Matt more pride in the Iowa program. Fran has apparently lost his age.
Zero chance you promote Gatens … no- you need to get this hire right.I think being a former Iowa player gives Matt more pride in the Iowa program. Fran has apparently lost his age.
I know the George talking is joking but the reality is Raveling won 2 NCAA tournament games in 22 years as a head coach at major conferences. He did bring in some nice players to Iowa.We don't want George, we need his bag man Martin.
Jackson is 6-16 this year. Blakeney is 8-14. They may very well be good coaches, but the optics would be terrible based on those records.Posted this in the other thread about names to keep an eye on. Just keep in mind that Fran came from Siena, UNC Greensboro, and Lehigh.......we don't have to limit our search to someone who has had power conference coaching.
In all seriousness, it looks like Iowa missed the boat by at least a year if they were looking to make a real splash hire. Most of the big up-and-coming names have already taken the jump up to their next job. Guys like DeVries to West Virginia, Dusty May to Michigan and Mark Byington to Vanderbilt.
But here's a few other names Iowa should probably keep an eye on:
Donte Jackson (Grambling State)
Chris Gerlufson (San Francisco)
Kenny Blakeney (Howard)
Drew Valentine (Loyola, Chicago)
Robert Jones (Norfolk State)
The way Drake plays bball gives me Lick era nightmares.....slow boring style
I am starting to lean into a decision to retain Fran, at least one more season.. hear me out:The guy can flat out coach and wins at a high level everywhere he goes. It'll be tough if Iowa sticks with Fran and we watch another program hire him away from Drake
I hear what you're saying.. But I would not be upset if Beth just went out and got McCollum. I'd hate to miss out if someone else snaps him up after this season (hopefully you're right that he won't leave after 1 year at Drake, unless Iowa offers).I am starting to lean into a decision to retain Fran, at least one more season.. hear me out:
Darian DeVries and Ben McCollum are both in year 1 at their respective programs. WVU has lost 4 of their last 5 and have nearly the same record as Iowa currently. Mac is 21-2 at Drake in his first year. Fran does have a solid recruiting class coming in.
If I am Beth, right now, maybe I give Fran one more year to see if he can turn it around and this would also give an opportunity to see how both Darian and Mac to see how their second year goes. I don’t think Mac would leave to another program after this season, other than Iowa.
Poor Gatens has been put in impossible situations twice by this program.
Do you really think Fran will “turn it around” next year?I am starting to lean into a decision to retain Fran, at least one more season.. hear me out:
Darian DeVries and Ben McCollum are both in year 1 at their respective programs. WVU has lost 4 of their last 5 and have nearly the same record as Iowa currently. Mac is 21-2 at Drake in his first year. Fran does have a solid recruiting class coming in.
If I am Beth, right now, maybe I give Fran one more year to see if he can turn it around and this would also give an opportunity to see how both Darian and Mac to see how their second year goes. I don’t think Mac would leave to another program after this season, other than Iowa.
I appreciate hearing someone take up the case against quick termination. It's good for the overall discussion.I am starting to lean into a decision to retain Fran, at least one more season.. hear me out:
Darian DeVries and Ben McCollum are both in year 1 at their respective programs. WVU has lost 4 of their last 5 and have nearly the same record as Iowa currently. Mac is 21-2 at Drake in his first year. Fran does have a solid recruiting class coming in.
If I am Beth, right now, maybe I give Fran one more year to see if he can turn it around and this would also give an opportunity to see how both Darian and Mac to see how their second year goes. I don’t think Mac would leave to another program after this season, other than Iowa.
I could get behind McCollum if that's the way it goes.The guy can flat out coach and wins at a high level everywhere he goes. It'll be tough if Iowa sticks with Fran and we watch another program hire him away from Drake
I appreciate hearing someone take up the case against quick termination. It's good for the overall discussion.
But here's the thing: Fran's contract runs through the 2027-28 season. There would have to be an astronomical change in results to warrant an extension beyond that. Plus, he would be nearly 70 by then. There is virtually no way Fran McCaffery is coaching at Iowa beyond 2028.
So, in other words, McCaffety is basically a lame duck right now, and will get lamer with each successive year. More and more, this will work against us in recruiting. And none of these facts will change a year from now, other than the cost of the buyout getting smaller. (You also can't count on the talent pool of replacements being any better ... even if there are more attractive candidates, the competition for their services could make them more difficult to hire.)
The one thing we know is that Fran will not be coaching at Iowa beyond 2028. Knowing that, it makes sense to me the pull the trigger now and start breathing new life into the program immediately. Why wait? It might save money, but you run the risk of having an even deeper hole to dig out of. And, you are bleeding revenue every year as ticket sales remain stagnant. Besides that, with the way this season has gone, you have the political capital right now to make the change. I think it would be very popular.
I think there is far more to be gained by making the move now than by waiting.
Good points. Let's say this year ends poorly, as it appears it likely will, and Beth brings back Fran next year. Let's say Fran then gets Iowa back to the NCAA tournament next year, but loses early again. What do you do then? Firing him at that point would seem weird given the rebound. As you said, the "political capital" for doing it this year might be as good as it's going to get.I appreciate hearing someone take up the case against quick termination. It's good for the overall discussion.
But here's the thing: Fran's contract runs through the 2027-28 season. There would have to be an astronomical change in results to warrant an extension beyond that. Plus, he would be nearly 70 by then. There is virtually no way Fran McCaffery is coaching at Iowa beyond 2028.
So, in other words, McCaffety is basically a lame duck right now, and will get lamer with each successive year. More and more, this will work against us in recruiting. And none of these facts will change a year from now, other than the cost of the buyout getting smaller. (You also can't count on the talent pool of replacements being any better ... even if there are more attractive candidates, the competition for their services could make them more difficult to hire.)
The one thing we know is that Fran will not be coaching at Iowa beyond 2028. Knowing that, it makes sense to me the pull the trigger now and start breathing new life into the program immediately. Why wait? It might save money, but you run the risk of having an even deeper hole to dig out of. And, you are bleeding revenue every year as ticket sales remain stagnant. Besides that, with the way this season has gone, you have the political capital right now to make the change. I think it would be very popular.
I think there is far more to be gained by making the move now than by waiting.
Those are my questions with McCollum as well, and I agree totally on the end result being what matters most, not as much the style of play. That said, I did watch the Drake game the other night, and it brought back memories of watching Pete Carril's Princeton teams... I have no doubt that McCollum is a terrific coach.. But will it translate to success in the Big Ten? DII and the MVC are one thing, but you've got to be able to recruit to a certain level to compete in the Big Ten.I could get behind McCollum if that's the way it goes.
But I have two lingering concerns:
I welcome any response to ease my concerns.
- Can he recruit at the top level? Developing lower-rated talent is great, but to compete at the highest level, you've got to have a few top-notch guys coming in.
- Style of play. I caught one of Drake's recent games on the TV, and it was kind of jarring to see players slowly walking the ball up the court after a made basket on the other end. That said, at the end of the day, I'm more worried about being successful than any particular style of play. But fans would need to prepare themselves for something significantly different than what we are accustomed to.
I think family matters to Fran and he'll have a hard time not being able to be around the boys at Butler. I think he will resign at years end.Agreed. If Fran stays, I bet we lose both Dix and Freeman----those guys can make more in NIL elsewhere and they probably want to go somewhere that they can make an NCAA run. They have experienced first hand the road beatdowns and are smart enought to figure out that Fran-ball doesn't work----need a lot better defense/rebounding. With those two guys gone and all we have is Fran's recruiting class, so we are a bottom feeder again next year and then you have an even bigger mess.
HIre a good coach this spring and there is small possibility you can retain Dix and Freeman and maybe some of the recruiting class, if the new coach wants the Fran guys. New coach might bring in some decent talent from his current team. Fran is definitely a Lame Duck right now and only direction with him in charge is for Iowa to be a multi-year bottom feeder.
My guess is Fran's personality doesn't allow him to take the high road and accept a buyout and move on. He's is going to have to be fired.
I could get behind McCollum if that's the way it goes.
But I have two lingering concerns:
I welcome any response to ease my concerns.
- Can he recruit at the top level? Developing lower-rated talent is great, but to compete at the highest level, you've got to have a few top-notch guys coming in.
- Style of play. I caught one of Drake's recent games on the TV, and it was kind of jarring to see players slowly walking the ball up the court after a made basket on the other end. That said, at the end of the day, I'm more worried about being successful than any particular style of play. But fans would need to prepare themselves for something significantly different than what we are accustomed to.
Well, we won't have to worry about it for at least one more season.The guy can flat out coach and wins at a high level everywhere he goes. It'll be tough if Iowa sticks with Fran and we watch another program hire him away from Drake
It is a tough situation, for reasons you and HawkLogic have outlined.Good points. Let's say this year ends poorly, as it appears it likely will, and Beth brings back Fran next year. Let's say Fran then gets Iowa back to the NCAA tournament next year, but loses early again. What do you do then? Firing him at that point would seem weird given the rebound. As you said, the "political capital" for doing it this year might be as good as it's going to get.
Or, things could continue to spiral next year as well, but as you pointed out, the hole to dig out of will only get deeper.
All things considered, I'm in favor of a change this year.
That was definitely worth the watch, and that eases my concerns about pace of play and whatnot - I love that BM believes in adjusting based on opponent and what he has to work with personnel wise, to give his team the best chance to win, rather than square peg round hole approach.
Listen to him talk about why he is playing the style he is right now… he says he doesn’t the amount of shooters he has had in the past, so they do want to jack up quick shots right now with his personnel. If he has the right personnel, they will play faster and with more fluidity as his teams at northwest did.
He really leans into the strategy he thinks will win games based on his personnel, their opponents and the scouting report.
He is all about winning.