Hunter Biden testimony - there is no laptop?.
- Thread starter JupiterHawk
- Start date
He just posted that the FBI never had it and then quotes a story talking about the FBI reviewing it.
If there is one thing that this story proves, there are some hard core Biden boot lickers on HROT. As bad as the Trump bootlickers
Posted about the FBI having "a" laptop, and not confirmed it formally belonged to Hunter or was ever "dropped off" by him.
Along with the random claims coming from "what was on the laptop", when that information is also clearly in question.
But there has always been lies and bullshit about “the laptop”...(apologies to 83Hawk)
You didn’t answer my question. Out of the millions of people around the world who were just as qualified, Zlochevsky hired the son of the Vice President of the United States and tried to hired the stepson of the Secretary of State.
Should I mark you down for “that’s the craziest fvckin’ coincidence ever” or should I mark you down for “Zlochevsky was clearly trying to purchase influence, but I don’t care because Trump”?
Oh, TJ, never change. Never answer any question, just get red faced demanding an answer as to why nobody will talk about the orange you are holding in a thread about apples.
You have zero proof that Hunter and Joe had a financial relationship that affected any decision Joe ever made. Zero.
Here’s my suspicion on the whole matter: Republican operatives hacked Hunter’s phone or computer and downloaded salacious images, then uploaded them along with potentially falsified documents to a laptop and dropped it off at the repair shop.
You love to use that phrase and yet you have no idea how to apply it properly. Me talking about Hunter Biden working for Burisma in a thread about Hunter Biden working for Burisma is the exact opposite of what the phrase “apples and oranges” conveys.
Since you seem determined to do your best Riley impression and refuse to answer a simple question, I’ll just go ahead and deduce that you’re perfectly fine with the Vice President’s son working for one of the most corrupt criminals in the world at the same time that Dad was supposed to be bringing him to justice.
And, despite those attempts, Joe Biden and others DID NOT run "interference" for them, and continued to follow US and Euro policy in rooting out a corrupt Ukrainian prosecutor and other oligarchs from Ukraine's government.
So, maybe the intent in hiring Hunter et al WAS to have an "In". But it did not work that way, because Joe Biden did not interfere with, and upheld overall US policy at the time.
Got it. You have no proof except what a drunken old sod in Rudy Giuliani and a Russian agent provided.
Lol. The prosecutor we installed (the one who had zero experience as a prosecutor and didn’t even have a law degree) proceeded to drop the charges against Zlochevsky.
Way to go, us!
Proof of what? The things I’ve listed are 100% factual, and were even before Rudy got involved in the case.
Name one thing I’ve said in this thread that isn’t true.
Of course it doesn’t, Sunshine. Joe bragged on camera about ordering Ukraine to fire Shokin, but he certainly can’t be held responsible for the fact that the unqualified guy he chose to replace him subsequently dropped all charges against one of the world’s most wanted criminals.
What color is the sky in your little world?
AGAIN: Joe Biden was the spokesperson who delivered formal US policy on Ukraine. He did not dictate US policy on Ukraine
He did NOTHING to protect his son, or anyone his son worked for. Period.
Sure. Joe didn’t have any authority at all. He was just talking out his ass when he threatened to withhold a billion dollars in aid if they didn’t fire Shokin.
And you know this definitively…how?
So United States and European Union policy at the time was to fire Shokin as Prosecutor General and replace him with a guy who had zero experience as a prosecutor and no
law degree?
That seems like a counterintuitive policy. But if you say so….
I would not trust a lawyer that you have to teach how to count to 21, stand at 17, stand on a dealers bust card, split Aces and tens....seems like a short lesson.
If the dealer has a 5 or 6...yea probably
But maybe I need that lesson 😀
It would depend on the count
AGAIN: Biden followed what US and EU policy was, regarding Ukraine.
Re-read that, until it sinks in for you.
Lol. So officials from both the United States and the European Union concluded that the best way to bring Mykola Zlochevsky to justice was to install a Prosecutor General who had zero experience as a prosecutor and didn’t even have a law degree.
Looking back now, that seems like a bit of a miscalculation. But I suppose hindsight is always 20/20.
Ask THEM
Biden did not dictate policy at the time. You seem to have trouble recognizing this simple FACT.
How would a rando FBI "witness" have any idea?
We already know that HB's online accounts had been hacked in this timeframe.
Doubling down...... nice
Call me crazy if if I have to bet on Hunter Biden telling the truth or literally anyone else, I'm picking the field.
JUST IN: FBI witness tells Hunter Biden's jury that NO TAMPERING occurred with his laptop
“No,” she replied when the prosecution asked on redirect if she had seen any evidence of tampering with the laptop data
Completely different things.
Your top claim would refer to someone forensically analyzing data and providing expertise as to why nothing was altered.
Also, irrelevant regarding an Apple Cloud account that had been hacked into
Just clarifying things for you that you're tiny brain is incapable of understanding.
