How creepy and obsessive. Archiving message board posts? Wow, that is just beyond weird and creepy.
I do not follow isu as closely as YOU obviously do, Pretender. I view Iowa's rivalries much differently. To me, the true rivalries for Iowa are in the Big Ten Conference. I want Iowa to do the best it possibly can versus teams from what many still consider the finest conference in existence. It's okay with me that isu achieves whatever success it does, but I also realize that it is not purely an apples to apples discussion as YOU want others to assume it to be.Originally posted by FG86:
So you don't find it pathetic that ISU has been finishing ahead of Iowa in the director's cup? Of course a Barta Lovefest Fan club member wouldn't find it pathetic.Originally posted by 5Fan5:
Now, it might be understandable how someone Pretending to be something they are not could forget words they posted just days ago on this very thead....
But, no one will mistake the content and context of what YOU posted, Pretender. Why the need to insert isu into the conversation if YOU now want to shy away from discussion regarding the relative strengths of each the Big Ten and big xii?Does one fit neatly into YOUR obsession toward anything Iowa and the other fly right in YOUR face? Why of course it does.
Turn it around... tell me/us why the big xii does so poorly compared to most if not all of the other Power 5 conferences? The ACC is better top to bottom. The Pac 12 is definitely better than the big xii. So is the SEC. It has already been established that the Big Ten is better. What is holding back the mighty big xii from excelling inthe Director's Cup standings? The University of Texas has all the money one institution could want (especially considering that they only have nine other programs to compete against). Why aren't the Longhorns doing better than teams from the the top of the other Power 5 conferences?
(That should keep YOU busy for awhile.)
Keep on being the Pretender that we all know and laugh at.
Poor, poor Iowa, playing in the B1G. How can we ever compete? Maybe at one of your Gary Barta Fan Club meetings, you and Gary can discuss Iowa moving to a conference where they can compete.
Odd you would bring up Texas since they are often found in the top 10 of the director's cup.
FG you and many other clown fans love to tout that clown fans act nothing like I say I model my posts after. I am simply giving you a golden opportunity to do call me on it. Either I am as wrong as you tout or deep down you know that what I say and mock is how isu fans by in large act, particularly on cry-clown fanatic.
I don't follow ISU. You are the one with all the ISU fun facts. You seem to have a lot of knowledge about them. Good for you.Originally posted by 5Fan5:
I do not follow isu as closely as YOU obviously do, Pretender. I view Iowa's rivalries much differently. To me, the true rivalries for Iowa are in the Big Ten Conference. I want Iowa to do the best it possibly can versus teams from what many still consider the finest conference in existence. It's okay with me that isu achieves whatever success it does, but I also realize that it is not purely an apples to apples discussion as YOU want others to assume it to be.Originally posted by FG86:
So you don't find it pathetic that ISU has been finishing ahead of Iowa in the director's cup? Of course a Barta Lovefest Fan club member wouldn't find it pathetic.Originally posted by 5Fan5:
Now, it might be understandable how someone Pretending to be something they are not could forget words they posted just days ago on this very thead....
But, no one will mistake the content and context of what YOU posted, Pretender. Why the need to insert isu into the conversation if YOU now want to shy away from discussion regarding the relative strengths of each the Big Ten and big xii?Does one fit neatly into YOUR obsession toward anything Iowa and the other fly right in YOUR face? Why of course it does.
Turn it around... tell me/us why the big xii does so poorly compared to most if not all of the other Power 5 conferences? The ACC is better top to bottom. The Pac 12 is definitely better than the big xii. So is the SEC. It has already been established that the Big Ten is better. What is holding back the mighty big xii from excelling inthe Director's Cup standings? The University of Texas has all the money one institution could want (especially considering that they only have nine other programs to compete against). Why aren't the Longhorns doing better than teams from the the top of the other Power 5 conferences?
(That should keep YOU busy for awhile.)
Keep on being the Pretender that we all know and laugh at.
Poor, poor Iowa, playing in the B1G. How can we ever compete? Maybe at one of your Gary Barta Fan Club meetings, you and Gary can discuss Iowa moving to a conference where they can compete.
Odd you would bring up Texas since they are often found in the top 10 of the director's cup.
Iowa competes in the Big Ten Conference. (The Pretend fan in YOU is showing once again... shame, shame.) Iowa just finished at 12-6 in men's basketball and the women have completed an undefeated home season in the Big Ten. The wrestling team won another consecutive Big Ten regular season title (perfect at 8-0). Even the most casual of Hawk fans knows these things, but leave it to YOU to show those true colors.
What is not at all odd, is that the analogy/concept regarding Texas flies right over YOUR flat head. If Texas has so much money (akin to Iowa compared to little ole isu, for instance) then why aren't the Longhorns performing better than just top ten? Should the Longhorns (or, insert team of choice) be at the very top given the amount of financial resources available to them? Or, should we just label Texas with the 'pathetic' term YOU want to loosely throw at Iowa?
Keep throwing crap out there that only confirms YOU as isu fan Pretending to be something else and I'll keep showing YOU the error of YOUR ways.
(YOU are on a real roll here today, Pretender. Morning, noon and likely into the night - Pretender ranting on HR is as predictable and transparent as they come.)
Go to St.Louis this weekend and see for yourself.
Many doctors, psychologists and psychiatrists can have a field day with cry-clown fanatic. Right cyinPeoria? Naw must ignore.
Even better. FG doesn't even grasp what he is touting. Because when he touts isu's rank in the Directors Cup it is due to womens volleyball and cross country.
Originally posted by FG86:
I don't follow ISU. You are the one with all the ISU fun facts. You seem to have a lot of knowledge about them. Good for you.Originally posted by 5Fan5:
I do not follow isu as closely as YOU obviously do, Pretender. I view Iowa's rivalries much differently. To me, the true rivalries for Iowa are in the Big Ten Conference. I want Iowa to do the best it possibly can versus teams from what many still consider the finest conference in existence. It's okay with me that isu achieves whatever success it does, but I also realize that it is not purely an apples to apples discussion as YOU want others to assume it to be.Originally posted by FG86:
So you don't find it pathetic that ISU has been finishing ahead of Iowa in the director's cup? Of course a Barta Lovefest Fan club member wouldn't find it pathetic.Originally posted by 5Fan5:
Now, it might be understandable how someone Pretending to be something they are not could forget words they posted just days ago on this very thead....
But, no one will mistake the content and context of what YOU posted, Pretender. Why the need to insert isu into the conversation if YOU now want to shy away from discussion regarding the relative strengths of each the Big Ten and big xii?Does one fit neatly into YOUR obsession toward anything Iowa and the other fly right in YOUR face? Why of course it does.
Turn it around... tell me/us why the big xii does so poorly compared to most if not all of the other Power 5 conferences? The ACC is better top to bottom. The Pac 12 is definitely better than the big xii. So is the SEC. It has already been established that the Big Ten is better. What is holding back the mighty big xii from excelling inthe Director's Cup standings? The University of Texas has all the money one institution could want (especially considering that they only have nine other programs to compete against). Why aren't the Longhorns doing better than teams from the the top of the other Power 5 conferences?
(That should keep YOU busy for awhile.)
Keep on being the Pretender that we all know and laugh at.
Poor, poor Iowa, playing in the B1G. How can we ever compete? Maybe at one of your Gary Barta Fan Club meetings, you and Gary can discuss Iowa moving to a conference where they can compete.
Odd you would bring up Texas since they are often found in the top 10 of the director's cup.
Iowa competes in the Big Ten Conference. (The Pretend fan in YOU is showing once again... shame, shame.) Iowa just finished at 12-6 in men's basketball and the women have completed an undefeated home season in the Big Ten. The wrestling team won another consecutive Big Ten regular season title (perfect at 8-0). Even the most casual of Hawk fans knows these things, but leave it to YOU to show those true colors.
What is not at all odd, is that the analogy/concept regarding Texas flies right over YOUR flat head. If Texas has so much money (akin to Iowa compared to little ole isu, for instance) then why aren't the Longhorns performing better than just top ten? Should the Longhorns (or, insert team of choice) be at the very top given the amount of financial resources available to them? Or, should we just label Texas with the 'pathetic' term YOU want to loosely throw at Iowa?
Keep throwing crap out there that only confirms YOU as isu fan Pretending to be something else and I'll keep showing YOU the error of YOUR ways.
(YOU are on a real roll here today, Pretender. Morning, noon and likely into the night - Pretender ranting on HR is as predictable and transparent as they come.)
Well of course not, Pretender... I presented a factual example using an institution other than Iowa to exhibit just how shallow and obsessive YOUR thinking can be and now YOU are not able to follow.
5, you are the one who is crying that Iowa cannot finish high in the director's cup because they play in the B1G. You are the one wailing about how poor Iowa and the B1G, no one but you.
Perhaps YOU can show me exactly where it is that I have ever stated that Iowa CANNNOT finish higher in the Director's Cup, because it is nowhere to be found. YOU posed a rather foolish question while ranting about something YOU pretend to know something about, and I merely responded while showing that YOU do not know nearly as much as YOU think YOU do.
Texas is competitive in the director's cup. To say otherwise shows your stupidity.
Not according to YOUR criteria. The team/program with the most dollars rules says Pretender I. Liar. Texas is simply a convenient example of the fallacy of YOUR very warped and obsessive pea brain, Pretender. Hook, line and sinker... you bit and swallowed.
The only person throwing crap out there is you. Claiming I am comparing Iowa and ISU wrestling just because I mentioned Iowa wrestling, telling us how the B1G is so tough that Iowa CAN'T finish any higher in the director's cup. What a bunch of hooey.
Just precisely how stupid do YOU wish to be here, Pretender? I reposted YOUR very words to indicate to YOU what I replied to earlier. YOU certainly did compare Iowa and isu wrestling and now YOU want to avoid it like the plague because YOU look stupid (hey.... there is the perfect example for YOU to use next time YOU want to opine about anything or anyone being stupid!)
Let's not talk about your roll, 5. It's always funny that you just happen to show up when 100 gets on his patent d-bag posting roll. You are by far the real pretender here.
My roll is quite simple really. I read the forums and watch YOU go on and on and on (the quantity of posts thingy is appropriate here) until someone needs to put an end to YOUR madness. That is what I do.
Weird thing about the director's cup. It ranks the top 10 men's and women's sports at each school. Apparently, some of you don't understand how it works.
Tsk, tsk, Pretender....
What I recall is someone ranting about how terrible the women's athletics were treated by the University of Iowa AD. Are we now to believe that women's basketball, soccer, track and field do find the environs suitable to succeeding at a reasonably high level.
Well, yipee. Is it on this thread? Is it what we are discussing now? Good lord. You and 100 are two creeps, I can tell you that.Originally posted by 5Fan5:
Tsk, tsk, Pretender....
I can recall dialogue with YOU concerning women's volleyball right here on HR. YOU wanted others to believe the big xii to be ever successful at volleyball. Then, it was aptly pointed out that that Pac 12 and Big Ten each have greater claim to volleyball success than the big xii and YOU disappeared.
Funny how that works.
Originally posted by 5Fan5:
What I recall is someone ranting about how terrible the women's athletics were treated by the University of Iowa AD. Are we now to believe that women's basketball, soccer, track and field do find the environs suitable to succeeding at a reasonably high level.
Try explaining exactly how that 'works', Pretender.
(Or, we can just add it to the list of all of YOUR contradictions and lies here on HR.)
I truly have no dog in this particular fight, but just because it is YOU, Pretender - let me ask this.
Originally posted by FG86:
Sounds almost as delusional as YOU (being firmly in the flannel brigade camp) claiming discrimination exists.Originally posted by 5Fan5:
What I recall is someone ranting about how terrible the women's athletics were treated by the University of Iowa AD. Are we now to believe that women's basketball, soccer, track and field do find the environs suitable to succeeding at a reasonably high level.
Try explaining exactly how that 'works', Pretender.
(Or, we can just add it to the list of all of YOUR contradictions and lies here on HR.)
Pretender is as Pretender does and YOU take the cake today (and yesterday and the day before...)!
Keep digging the hole a little deeper, Pretender.
Hmmm, well funny thing is, I know nothing about a purveyor of a certain cyclone website. But did I deny mentioning 100's stalking someone and posting information about them? Not that I recall. No I didn't save anything on this. Just shows what a stalker 100 is.Originally posted by 5Fan5:
I truly have no dog in this particular fight, but just because it is YOU, Pretender - let me ask this.
Are you denying that YOU have previously(yet recently) brought forth information from posts years ago right here? Something about a former purveyor of a certain, but to remain unidentified, cyclone website's personal address (the detail might be sketchy, but the memory is still clear enough to recall Pretender's mention of that here)....
So, given that to be true, where did YOU obtain that info if not from something saved/archived from literally years past?
Those pesky lies will come back and bite YOU again and again unless YOU want to quit this charade and permanently move along.
Your BFF, 100, just posted that he SAVES posts from CF. That is quite a bit different than me recalling the time he revealed all that information about a poster. That was quite an uproar as you may recall. Pretty easy to remember and quite different than ARCHIVING POSTS from CF.Originally posted by 5Fan5:
I truly have no dog in this particular fight, but just because it is YOU, Pretender - let me ask this.
Are you denying that YOU have previously(yet recently) brought forth information from posts years ago right here? Something about a former purveyor of a certain, but to remain unidentified, cyclone website's personal address (the detail might be sketchy, but the memory is still clear enough to recall Pretender's mention of that here)....
So, given that to be true, where did YOU obtain that info if not from something saved/archived from literally years past?
Those pesky lies will come back and bite YOU again and again unless YOU want to quit this charade and permanently move along.
Why would anyone need to archive anything from YOU, Pretender?
Originally posted by 5Fan5:
Are you denying a claim has been filed against UI? Why do you hate women so much? Are you Gary Barta? That would explain your love for him.Originally posted by FG86:
Sounds almost as delusional as YOU (being firmly in the flannel brigade camp) claiming discrimination exists.Originally posted by 5Fan5:
What I recall is someone ranting about how terrible the women's athletics were treated by the University of Iowa AD. Are we now to believe that women's basketball, soccer, track and field do find the environs suitable to succeeding at a reasonably high level.
Try explaining exactly how that 'works', Pretender.
(Or, we can just add it to the list of all of YOUR contradictions and lies here on HR.)
Pretender is as Pretender does and YOU take the cake today (and yesterday and the day before...)!
Keep digging the hole a little deeper, Pretender.
Why does 100 have a need to archive anything from message boards?Originally posted by 5Fan5:
Why would anyone need to archive anything from YOU, Pretender?
According to YOU, YOU have not been posting here all that long (was a very casual poster that just recently decided to participate more in the HR [and CF] formums.) Much, if not all of YOUR material would still be active on the pages shown here on the various topic boards. No one would need to look very far at all to find YOUR idiocy and minutia.
(But, this does lead one to wonder why YOU think there would be anything from YOU out there to archive. Another, slip by Pretender who knows that SHE has been posting on HR much more and much longer than SHE lets on. My, my, my, it is really a full time job trying to keep everything straight when most of the time all YOU do is lie, Pretender.)
BTW - how are the kids doing. Must be a very high priority for you seeing as you hardly spend any time at all here on HR (not to mention CF and however many other sites you frequent. Quite the example YOU are!
