Looks political which would be illegal
Watch the whole video both sides here
Watch the whole video both sides here
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, that's not the real issue. The real issue is the outgoing Obama administration illegally disclosed the name of a US citizen who was swept up in normal surveillance, and did so for political reasons.I'll put this with the other 5 threads about Susan Rice that were created from this mornings talking points emails.
Donald Trump made up a lie about Barack Obama wire tapping Trump Tower after watching a tv show on Fox. That's the real issue.
Of course they said that... Former officials?"Former national security officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, described the requests as normal and said they were justified by the need for the president’s top security adviser to understand the context of reports sent to her by the nation’s intelligence agencies"
She lies more than Trump...BURN THE WITCH!
She is allowed to collect them, not disseminate them. The collection has been the only thing discussed and that is legal and normal as indicated.No, that's not the real issue. The real issue is the outgoing Obama administration illegally disclosed the name of a US citizen who was swept up in normal surveillance, and did so for political reasons.
If this is now okay with anyone, we can say "goodbye" to privacy, "hello Big Brother."
Come on, more than Trump? How would that be physically possible? She'd need two heads.
Makes you wonder why Susan Rice said she doesn't know anything about this."Former national security officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, described the requests as normal and said they were justified by the need for the president’s top security adviser to understand the context of reports sent to her by the nation’s intelligence agencies"
Asked by other members of the CFR more likely.Susan Rice was a puppet of Barack Obama. Everything
she did in the White House was at his request. The
ultimate issue: What were the orders given to Rice by
Obama and what was their real purpose?
Makes you wonder why Susan Rice said she doesn't know anything about this.
People will peg this directly on Obama, and part of that is correct. This is more of a group effort though, CFR members galore have been anti-Trump since the beginning of his campaign.Actually if she asked about things pertaining to the election or the transition team she could be in jeopardy.
We just dont have all the facts yet.
Add this to the list for the special prosecuter
1. Trump and Russia
2. Rice and her possible leaks and unmasking
3. HRC and pay for play with Russia/ Podesta
4. Obama and if he tapped the Trumpster
5. Trumps aids and Russia
I didn't say she did it, but someone did. There weren't many people who could have done it, but Susan Rice was certainly one of them.She is allowed to collect them, not disseminate them. The collection has been the only thing discussed and that is legal and normal as indicated.
Whether she spread/leaked them has yet to be proven and is the only real issue here.
It was probably leaked by a YouTube video.Yes please explain why she stated she didn't know about any of this? Maybe she misremembered.