Oklahoma
- Thread starter Ronman
- Start date
Everything. Simply put, Iowa is a far superior team to clown u. You are lucky our offense wasn’t clicking last week. Would have been ugly.
I am a Steelers fan and it irritates me to no end that NE has owned the Steelers seemingly forever now. I could say things like "if Ben hadn't thrown to the wrong team" or "if Belicheck didn't cheat" to assuage my disappointment. At the end of the day, NE has just been better. Same situation with Alabama. They have recruited the best players in CFB for the past decade and have built a system that is unmatched in the history of the sport. You obviously have some sort of pathetic hard-on for them. I personally am ambivalent concerning them. I respect them for their success but I don't root for them. Georgia played them a great game but Alabama won. Let me guess, you are one of the minions here bitter over OSU not getting in?
It's really a shame that Iowa and Iowa State don't play each others, so we'd know which team is better and we wouldn't have to spend all comparing schedules and other useless crap to try making a point.
Or isu improved from game 1 to game 2. Isu would have won last weeks game if home game or isu 2nd game.
OU is a much better team than iowa, probably 14 points.
For all the criticism of big 12 d
1) defense is 1/3 of your team. The other 2/3 is offense and special teams.
2) pretty sure big 12 o, would light up vaunted big 10 d, ex ou 31-16 over osu in 2017.
I guess Iowa should do the honorable thing then and forfeit our win versus Iowa State. Because it is not fair that we played Iowa State in our second game when it was their first game of the season.
Yes. Here it is along with the national ranking.
3-0 Iowa State #1 in the country
3-0 Nebraska #2 in the country
You are 0-2 and a pathetic poster so I suppose you can hang your hat on that.OU was much more difficult to defend, and would be favored by 14+ against iowa.
Iowa does have an above avg dline tho, so can hang your hat on that.
Lol, a lot of stupid assumptions here. I don’t give a shit about most of what you just posted. My point stands, Oklahoma could have won that game. They were in no way inferior to Georgia. That’s my only point. Now, kindly gfy.
Joker - Let me get this straight. Under your logic, Okie almost beat Georgia and Georgia almost beat Alabama so therefore Okie could win the national championship. Faulty on 3 levels but I will entertain you. Um ISU beat Okie and Iowa beat ISU so hence Iowa is basically as close as Okie to winning the national championship. Well a couple assumptions removed and your transitive property analysis in place. Maybe ISU should worry about Akron and let the bog boys discuss conference and national championships.
Why don't you do the world a favor and follow your avatar's lead, pussy? This place would smell a lot better.
No, that’s your dumbass logic. If you don’t think either of those teams could have won then I think we’re done here. It’s my opinion.
Clone fans talking football smack is precious. Since you guys are hanging around here, for whatever reason, maybe you can help me with a little bit of trivia. Can you name the last decade in which ISU football had a .500 or better record?
LOL. Sounds like the Clowns need to exercise some demons against the Hawks, who are a bunch of pre-Madonnas. I think they are a shoe-in for a victory next year.
Which was intentional. Long-standing joke on the boards to say it that way as a point of emphasis.
I watched part of it. Agree. Horrible defense, horrible tackling. Giving that much up to ISU's bad offense tells me that we'd probably hang 50 on that defense. And so it goes in the Big 12.
So you are entitled to your opinion yet other people's opinions trigger your kind responses? Sounds fair.
I didn’t say Okie couldn’t win idiot. It was your inferential leaps that I was poking holes in. The Big 12’s clear problem is blocking and tackling. That is why they have so few kids drafted. They can get away with it in conference cause nobody blocks or tackles. I think OKie is very good but what I saw yesterday on their defense there is no way they can beat a similarly talented team that blocks and tackles. Until that gift interception at the end of the game that Motley guy from Okie looked like he was on he take.
I think you're preaching to the choir here, LC. Less than 24 hrs since the ISU-OK game and Cyclone fans have been all over this board, mostly talking smack about the weak B1G, since it's tough to talk smack about yourself when you're 0-2. They need to take your advice.
Okie's secondary had some of the worst tacklers I've ever seen for a team that highly rated.
I agree, isu improved in game 2
Ya francis, you disappoint, i thought you were a fairly reasonable poster, not one of the tavern hawk, trailer park, high school dropout posters that i run into over here
Good luck the rest of the season with the B1G west schedule and no michigan, mich state, or ohio state, wow
Not everybody gets to play Incarnate Word and suspended players. Too bad we couldn't just settle the game on the field.Ya francis, you disappoint, i thought you were a fairly reasonable poster, not one of the tavern hawk, trailer park, high school dropout posters that i run into over here
Good luck the rest of the season with the B1G west schedule and no michigan, mich state, or ohio state, wow
Before the season, I was really questioning all the hype coming from the Peterson/Williams media machine about the clone ‘lock down’ corners. What was I thinking?!!!!I agree, isu improved in game 2
Ya francis, you disappoint, i thought you were a fairly reasonable poster, not one of the tavern hawk, trailer park, high school dropout posters that i run into over here
Good luck the rest of the season with the B1G west schedule and no michigan, mich state, or ohio state, wow
I agree, if only the two schools played and a winner was determined.
I don't know, but having a mobile QB and super talented receivers seems to be enough at this point. Against Alabama, it may not be enough.
Their QB is good with either feet planted or tucking and running. He is so poor throwing when flushed a good D would take a couple or three of those—and try to make him throw on the run...
As for that D and their tackling ability—turnstyles on ice skates...
yeah ask OSU how that went last year when they handed our rear to us...oh wait what..
god ISU clowns are the dumbest in the world, if you really believe that you are dumber than a pile of dog crap.
This ranks by conference divisions. If I find one just by conference, I'll post it.
CONFERENCE, CENTRAL MEAN, SIMPLE AVERAGE, TEAMS, WIN50%
1 SEC-WEST (A) = 84.88 84.46 ( 1) 7 84.64 ( 1)
2 BIG TEN-EAST (A) = 80.54 79.93 ( 2) 7 80.51 ( 2)
3 PAC-12(NORTH) (A) = 78.49 78.39 ( 4) 6 78.51 ( 4)
4 BIG 12 (A) = 78.48 78.86 ( 3) 10 78.71 ( 3)
5 ACC-ATLANTIC (A) = 77.29 78.29 ( 5) 7 77.96 ( 5)
6 SEC-EAST (A) = 76.07 76.68 ( 6) 7 76.32 ( 6)
7 ACC-COASTAL (A) = 75.98 76.19 ( 7) 7 76.12 ( 7)
8 PAC-12(SOUTH) (A) = 74.50 74.04 ( 9) 6 74.13 ( 8)
9 BIG TEN-WEST (A) = 73.79 74.29 ( 8) 7 74.05 ( 9)
https://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/2018/conference/
Rank, Conference (Teams), All, Non-Conf, Index, Sos, Sos Rk
1 Southeastern (14) 32-9 (78%) 28-5 (85%) 31.74 53.92 3
2 Big 12 (10) 20-8 (71%) 19-7 (73%) 28.05 51.31 7
3 Pacific-12 (12) 24-12 (67%) 22-10 (69%) 27.80 51.62 6
4 Big Ten (14) 26-14 (65%) 24-12 (67%) 27.45 53.59 4
5 Atlantic Coast (14) 28-12 (70%) 24-8 (75%) 27.00 55.10 2
http://realtimerpi.com/college_football/ncaaf_conf_Men.html
1 Southeastern (14) 32-9 (78%) 28-5 (85%) 31.74 53.92 3
2 Big 12 (10) 20-8 (71%) 19-7 (73%) 28.05 51.31 7
3 Pacific-12 (12) 24-12 (67%) 22-10 (69%) 27.80 51.62 6
4 Big Ten (14) 26-14 (65%) 24-12 (67%) 27.45 53.59 4
5 Atlantic Coast (14) 28-12 (70%) 24-8 (75%) 27.00 55.10 2
http://realtimerpi.com/college_football/ncaaf_conf_Men.html
What’s Big Ten record against Big 12 teams? I think it has to be pretty close, although I know how dominant the Big 12 can be against non-conference opponents.
Maryland beat Texas @ Landover
Iowa beat Iowa State @ Iowa City
Kansas beat Rutgers @ Lawrence
Ohio State beat TCU @ Arlington
All those results factor are factored in to the computer rankings.
I love me some computer games. They make them so realistic these days. I think I still prefer Techmo though. I especially liked having Bo Jackson (in original Techmo). They supposedly built his computer skill set to match his real life skill set, although I don’t think I ever remember Bo running a real life 2.4 40. That said, please carry on with your analysis, I’m sure you had a point to make.
Looks like your computer is broken then . Going 1-3 with your one inter conference win coming against arguably the worst P5 team ever isn’t compelling evidence that the B12 >B10.
