ADVERTISEMENT

The CC Show....

I will give you a clue on who linked it

Why don't you review what I'd posted regarding her improved play after around Game #20, Cletus?
The folks misquoting me saying she was playing "league average" referred to her pre-Olympics games, which is 100% accurate.

She dramatically improved after that, and the data I'd posted illustrated it for you quite clearly.
 
How does this thread still have legs?

Cailtin needs to start collecting royalties from the ad revenue on this thread.
 
Why don't you review what I'd posted regarding her improved play after around Game #20, Cletus?
The folks misquoting me saying she was playing "league average" referred to her pre-Olympics games, which is 100% accurate.

She dramatically improved after that, and the data I'd posted illustrated it for you quite clearly.
Unlike you I haven't been changing your post and then quoting it.

Ignoring the fact that you linked the 9 point steal article? Par for the course for dishonest joe
Claiming that the op was misquoted when he vehemently claimed that Clark and Taurasi were both league average? Par for the course for dishonest Joe
Actually taking a quote from a legendary coach and coming up with something that she in no way said or implied? Par for the course for dishonest Joe

Credibility for dishonest joe in this thread? Zero.........and only that high because that is the lowest rating there is.
 
How does this thread still have legs?

Cailtin needs to start collecting royalties from the ad revenue on this thread.
We were celebrating that the turnover machine Caitlin Clark was named First Team All WNBA and then some liar decided to show up with their typical crap. So the thread lives. Headed out to Vegas in a few weeks but no game watch as we will be at the UCLA game the night before hitting Vegas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZachJump
claimed that Clark and Taurasi were both league average?
At the time, they absolutely were.

Again: review the stats, Cletus.
Clark's game vastly improved over the course of the season. Her performances late in the season were 2x better than what she did early on. Few past rookies have improved like that in their first year. Napheesa Collier was one of them, and is now one of the top tier players in the league.
 
At the time, they absolutely were.

Again: review the stats, Cletus.
Clark's game vastly improved over the course of the season. Her performances late in the season were 2x better than what she did early on. Few past rookies have improved like that in their first year. Napheesa Collier was one of them, and is now one of the top tier players in the league.
‘At the time, they absolutely were.’

Look at that, you are posting your opinion as fact.
At least Gilligan had 6 other people on his island. You just have….. you….

Ready for the ‘as I posted before’ like that has any substance to it.
Or break out some random graph you made up. Either way
Joe credibility = 0
 
Because it is a simply point of fact that CC destroyed the league TOs numbers
Something she needs to work on if she wants her team to go deep into the playoffs.
Fun stat, the Fever as a team had 16 more turnovers this season than they did last season. They also had 96 more assists. So it seems that Clark handling the ball as much as she does equals 0.5 more turnovers a game and 2.5 assists a game for her team. That seems like a positive to me.

Also, in the 2 games of the playoffs she had 17 assists and 5 turnovers (3.4 A/T), so she worked on the turnovers and her team still didn't go far in the playoffs.
 
Also, in the 2 games of the playoffs she had 17 assists and 5 turnovers (3.4 A/T), so she worked on the turnovers and her team still didn't go far in the playoffs.
Which is entirely consistent w/ what I've posted: Her late-year performances were much better.

She played much better in the last game than in their first playoff game.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Kelsers
Nope

I've posted facts as facts.
It's in the graphs posted for you pages ago.
Newsflash
Because Joe posts it….. doesn’t make it a fact……
Reminder… you linked the infamous 9 point steal ‘fact’
Just because you can find someone(you) who can create a graph that supports your premise doesn’t make it a fact.

I can find graphs that are anti vax, does that make them a ‘fact’?

Slippery slope you are on, as a confirmed liar in this thread your credibility is zero….
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkeye54545
Newsflash
Because Joe posts it….. doesn’t make it a fact……

Someone doesn't understand what constitutes a fact here.
The data I'd posted for you is 100% factual. The site it came from is linked, and you are able to review it, yourself.
 
Someone doesn't understand what constitutes a fact here.
The data I'd posted for you is 100% factual. The site it came from is linked, and you are able to review it, yourself.
“Someone doesn’t understand what constitutes a fact here.”

Finally you got something correct. The poster named Joe doesn’t understand that just because a link is posted it doesn’t mean it is a fact.
The poster named Joe provided a link that talked about the magical 9 point steal. That doesn’t make that a fact.
 
“Someone doesn’t understand what constitutes a fact here.”

Finally you got something correct.

Glad you're able to admit you are confused what constitutes factual data.
Now, go back and review those graphics, so you can understand the performance improvement late in the season (like Collier had)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pinehawk
Glad you're able to admit you are confused what constitutes factual data.
Now, go back and review those graphics, so you can understand the performance improvement late in the season (like Collier had)
“Finally you got something correct. The poster named Joe doesn’t understand that just because a link is posted it doesn’t mean it is a fact.”

FIFY
You seem to struggle with accuracy…. and honesty…. and having a clue in this thread.
 
To be fair, the World Series was up against The Golden Bachelorette.

good-point-maclen-stanley.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: MplsHawk
Not sure if anyone else saw it, but they held the WNBA draft lottery the other day. Paige Bueckers is expected to the be clear number 1 pick, and will probably be Clark's top WNBA rival in coming years, as they play the same position and style of basketball.
The Dallas Wings had a 45% shot of winning the first pick, and the LA Sparks (with Cameron Brinks) had a 44% chance of winning the first pick. And....Dallas won the overall number one pick.
Good. As a Clark fan, I'd rather have Bueckers in Texas than in Los Angeles.
 
Not sure if anyone else saw it, but they held the WNBA draft lottery the other day. Paige Bueckers is expected to the be clear number 1 pick, and will probably be Clark's top WNBA rival in coming years, as they play the same position and style of basketball.
The Dallas Wings had a 45% shot of winning the first pick, and the LA Sparks (with Cameron Brinks) had a 44% chance of winning the first pick. And....Dallas won the overall number one pick.
Good. As a Clark fan, I'd rather have Bueckers in Texas than in Los Angeles.
While it’s widely assumed that Bueckers will enter the draft, she does have the option of staying at UConn for one more year after this season. If she decides to go pro, Paige and Arike would make a pretty solid backcourt.
 
Not sure if anyone else saw it, but they held the WNBA draft lottery the other day. Paige Bueckers is expected to the be clear number 1 pick, and will probably be Clark's top WNBA rival in coming years, as they play the same position and style of basketball.
The Dallas Wings had a 45% shot of winning the first pick, and the LA Sparks (with Cameron Brinks) had a 44% chance of winning the first pick. And....Dallas won the overall number one pick.
Good. As a Clark fan, I'd rather have Bueckers in Texas than in Los Angeles.
Our old friend Sheryl Swoopes is going to go overboard for her love of Paige. Should be transparent as hell but I would expect nothing less from that hag



Will be interesting to see what happens with this Unrivaled thing here in 20 minutes. Sounds like the Olympic snub is joining the league
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT