Someone doesn't want to read what I'd posted, apparently.Too many 9 point steals in those metrics.
Someone doesn't want to read what I'd posted, apparently.Too many 9 point steals in those metrics.
That steal theory actually came from a link some poster posted. I will give you a clue on who linked itSomeone doesn't want to read what I'd posted, apparently.
I will give you a clue on who linked it
Unlike you I haven't been changing your post and then quoting it.Why don't you review what I'd posted regarding her improved play after around Game #20, Cletus?
The folks misquoting me saying she was playing "league average" referred to her pre-Olympics games, which is 100% accurate.
She dramatically improved after that, and the data I'd posted illustrated it for you quite clearly.
We were celebrating that the turnover machine Caitlin Clark was named First Team All WNBA and then some liar decided to show up with their typical crap. So the thread lives. Headed out to Vegas in a few weeks but no game watch as we will be at the UCLA game the night before hitting Vegas.How does this thread still have legs?
Cailtin needs to start collecting royalties from the ad revenue on this thread.
If you have an issue with metrics I've posted, go take those up w/ the folks who did that analysis.Unlike you I haven't been changing your post and then quoting it.
She indeed blew-away the WNBA record for TOs in a season.We were celebrating that the turnover machine Caitlin Clark
At the time, they absolutely were.claimed that Clark and Taurasi were both league average?
How does this thread still have legs?
Nope.Joes Place,.. when people stop responding he just continues with the rant.
Or don’t like garbage, pretty simple. 9 point steals? You brought that here.If you have an issue with metrics I've posted, go take those up w/ the folks who did that analysis.
At least you didn’t change the post before quoting it. Changed the context so still dishonest. Are you a politician?She indeed blew-away the WNBA record for TOs in a season.
You seem to want to keep posting that point.
^^^Or don’t like garbage
Because it is a simply point of fact that CC destroyed the league TOs numbersAt least you didn’t change the post before quoting it.
‘At the time, they absolutely were.’At the time, they absolutely were.
Again: review the stats, Cletus.
Clark's game vastly improved over the course of the season. Her performances late in the season were 2x better than what she did early on. Few past rookies have improved like that in their first year. Napheesa Collier was one of them, and is now one of the top tier players in the league.
Fun stat, the Fever as a team had 16 more turnovers this season than they did last season. They also had 96 more assists. So it seems that Clark handling the ball as much as she does equals 0.5 more turnovers a game and 2.5 assists a game for her team. That seems like a positive to me.Because it is a simply point of fact that CC destroyed the league TOs numbers
Something she needs to work on if she wants her team to go deep into the playoffs.
Nope.
One of your buddies keeps blabbering nonsense. I just correct it.
Nope‘At the time, they absolutely were.’
Look at that, you are posting your opinion as fact.
So, the rest of the team dramatically reduced theirs.Fun stat, the Fever as a team had 16 more turnovers this season than they did last season.
Which is entirely consistent w/ what I've posted: Her late-year performances were much better.Also, in the 2 games of the playoffs she had 17 assists and 5 turnovers (3.4 A/T), so she worked on the turnovers and her team still didn't go far in the playoffs.
NewsflashNope
I've posted facts as facts.
It's in the graphs posted for you pages ago.
Newsflash
Because Joe posts it….. doesn’t make it a fact……
“Someone doesn’t understand what constitutes a fact here.”Someone doesn't understand what constitutes a fact here.
The data I'd posted for you is 100% factual. The site it came from is linked, and you are able to review it, yourself.
“Someone doesn’t understand what constitutes a fact here.”
Finally you got something correct.
“Finally you got something correct. The poster named Joe doesn’t understand that just because a link is posted it doesn’t mean it is a fact.”Glad you're able to admit you are confused what constitutes factual data.
Now, go back and review those graphics, so you can understand the performance improvement late in the season (like Collier had)
Not at all.You seem to struggle with accuracy
Can’t top the 9 point steal. 27, 39, 14, 7Not at all.
I've posted the numbers. If you have different numbers, show them. You're just flailing now
To be fair, the World Series was up against The Golden Bachelorette.
To be fair, the World Series was up against The Golden Bachelorette.
And “The Voice”…To be fair, the World Series was up against The Golden Bachelorette.
While it’s widely assumed that Bueckers will enter the draft, she does have the option of staying at UConn for one more year after this season. If she decides to go pro, Paige and Arike would make a pretty solid backcourt.Not sure if anyone else saw it, but they held the WNBA draft lottery the other day. Paige Bueckers is expected to the be clear number 1 pick, and will probably be Clark's top WNBA rival in coming years, as they play the same position and style of basketball.
The Dallas Wings had a 45% shot of winning the first pick, and the LA Sparks (with Cameron Brinks) had a 44% chance of winning the first pick. And....Dallas won the overall number one pick.
Good. As a Clark fan, I'd rather have Bueckers in Texas than in Los Angeles.
Our old friend Sheryl Swoopes is going to go overboard for her love of Paige. Should be transparent as hell but I would expect nothing less from that hagNot sure if anyone else saw it, but they held the WNBA draft lottery the other day. Paige Bueckers is expected to the be clear number 1 pick, and will probably be Clark's top WNBA rival in coming years, as they play the same position and style of basketball.
The Dallas Wings had a 45% shot of winning the first pick, and the LA Sparks (with Cameron Brinks) had a 44% chance of winning the first pick. And....Dallas won the overall number one pick.
Good. As a Clark fan, I'd rather have Bueckers in Texas than in Los Angeles.