Kids are much more resilient than we give them credit for.Kids, man.
Kids are much more resilient than we give them credit for.Kids, man.
Looks to me like the West is doing just fine and Putin is the one with the problem.
YepSo long as 'anything' doesn't involve a NATO member, when wasn't that the case?
I'm going to put my balls on a Russian face
Oh yeah! Awesome news if accurate.Second tweet is the new information. Putin has the military acumen of Nicholas II.
Just don't put it on the internet like these guys:I'm going to put my balls on a Russian face
While I think it will be a little slower than you think from here on out, the bigger question remains, "to what end?" Sanctions are not an end in themselves - that's a bit of a western/american mindset. Usually, the point of sanctions is to (i) create popular suffering so as to undermine domestic political support, resulting in regime change, (ii) create popular suffering so as to undermine domestic political support resulting in policy change, or (iii) to erode the capacity to make war (eg, by limiting raw materials, etc.).
My point is that the Russian system is not going to have a problem handling either (i) or (ii), since popular support (or even oligarchical support) is not the underpinning of the regime or policy. That leaves us with (iii), which will occur, but in a command/authoritarian economy, unfortunately slower than we might hope.
What if Putin calculates the US/NATO won’t respond in kind if he uses a couple tactical nukes on the Ukrainians to make them concede?
He’d probably be right…we aren’t about to start trading nuclear strikes with the Russians over Ukraine. Lots of horrible possibilities in this conflict and I put nothing past Putin at this point.
Actually, he's less likely if NATO puts boots on the ground, because nuking NATO members on the battlefield will almost certainly result in the complete destruction of Russia.It's the only reason NATO hasn't put boots on the ground.
to make sure i am understanding correcly. this brainy gal is expecting ukranians to take time off from getting capped to watch her offerings and pay (only) 30% her rate? or is she offering them 70% of her take?
She’s discounting her shitty porn for people who are fighting for their lives.to make sure i am understanding correcly. this brainy gal is expecting ukranians to take time off from getting capped to watch her offerings and pay (only) 30% her rate? or is she offering them 70% of her take?
Is there a definite number two person who would take over if something happened to Putin?That's the fear for me. There seems to be a clear divide between very authoritarian, hawkish, old timers who are close to Putin and who really want war to reclaim the USSR regardless of how many people have to die to do it.
There are also some more level headed people who think it's nonsense.
Just because Putin gets taken out (possibly) doesn't mean the next guy up is any better.
How do you know her porn is shitty?She’s discounting her shitty porn for people who are fighting for their lives.
Yes, real life Dexter. Translation: guy who likes to kill, but hopefully has a cover.Nah, just a much more likable Chris Kyle.
Now post actual AOC quotes.No end to idiots in congress.AOC-linked group blames US for Russia invasion and demands end to NATO
Immediately after demanding a ceasefire the group also called for an end to 'further intervention' -- even as Kyiv's officials invite Europeans and other allies to come take up arms and fight.www.dailymail.co.uk
There is good OnlyFans porn? And she’s doing Ahegao in her profile picture.How do you know her porn is shitty?
Yeah! Let us be the judge of that.How do you know her porn is shitty?
I'm going to put my balls on a Russian face
Well at least he’s trying. There aren’t many in the world who can even get an audience with Putin.
France has the largest military in Europe and is a nuclear power. They’d best listen.Strongmen dictators aren’t going to take guys like Macron seriously
Strongmen dictators aren’t going to take guys like Macron seriously