I agree with your first comment. The next ones aren't correct.
That and the some immigrants are not human comment.
Yes, which is why you direct a lot of the revenues to subsidize domestics, and especially domestic EVs and their producers - at least until our guys ramp up production.
Finance is a smart guy, but he has trouble seeing benefit from government actions, even when they are pointed out.
Your examples are different than punitive tariffs.
Pretty sure he was responding to your other comment: "Government interference in markets usually doesn't have any benefits, and often causes more harm than good."
And you seem enamored with the government being required to provide a solution when government works in its interest instead of what the markets would do if left alone.
Why would any punitive tariff be good? Why would you believe one is absolutely bad and another one is good? What makes that true?
Sorry we aren’t Trump translators. Is it others fault that Trump can’t communicate?
No. It’s others fault when they focus on dumb shit while ignoring the important shit. Also their fault when they make up their own meaning to what he says and then spread it as gospel. And if you need a translator for anything he said on that day, you’re a complete ****ing idiot.
trump riffing on tarriffs (that won't ever actually happen) isn't any more important than him talking about an(other) anticipated violent reaction to him losing an election
Except he never talked about anticipated violent reaction to him losing an election in that speech. Are you dishonest or just ignorant of what he actually said?
when you encourage one violent reaction after losing an election, you tend to not get the benefit of the doubt when using violent/shocking rhetoric about possibly losing another election
You aren’t paying attention. Trump floats from one topic to another and we need his handlers to tell us routinely what he actually meant. Who’s the ****ing idiot? I’d say anyone who continues to back the fake tanned cheeto.
And who is that? Two comments in a row proves you don’t pay attention to anything but your own imagination.
Trump doesn’t recognize the difference between types of tariffs.
We have so many examples historically that markets will focus on profits first, public good a distant second.
I don’t think there’s an absolute good or bad here. There are times that a tariff can be justified and others where it’s not necessary. Just as there are times government action is necessary when the market fails to act and times the market will do so itself.
It’s called “parsing”. It’s not hard to put all of the sentences together to know exact what he’s talking about. You all act like the cake isn’t already made in regards to Trump’s stupid ass, that you have to keep inventing ingredients to throw in there.
I mean, when the man gives a word salad of a speech everytime he talks and there’s usually at least 3 different ways it can be interpreted…that allows his defenders to rationalize everything he says.
I vote no on the 100% tariff of course, but was he referring to the Chinese EV’s made in Mexico?
Someone threatening to murder his opposition once he is in power is a pretty significant claim that probably needs to get more attention than it has gotten. Have you ever watched "The Killing Fields"?
Agree. So much focus on the Delaware Demented Dipstick’s inane ramblings - rich territory to be sure - that the Narcissistic Nutjob gets away with his shallow incendiary ramblings meant to stir up the weirdos who go to his rallies. It provides huge opportunities for the Democrats to use against him.
And Mitt Romney murdered some lady’s husband. Remember? Good luck expecting swing voters to buy all of these repeated lies.
And the worst part is that he then stuffed the dudes carcass into the dog crate with the family pet on their way to the beach.
