What did he take with him? It just seems as though since he left the Hawks have struggled with winning the big ones and taking a dip in recruitment. Was he as big as loss that I think he was?
What did he take with him? It just seems as though since he left the Hawks have struggled with winning the big ones and taking a dip in recruitment. Was he as big as loss that I think he was?
Kemerer, Marinelli, Renteria, mejia, Troy, young, Happel, Stoll, BS, etc... Recruiting is fine. Could always be better, but PSU is killing it in recruiting not UNI.What did he take with him? It just seems as though since he left the Hawks have struggled with winning the big ones and taking a dip in recruitment. Was he as big as loss that I think he was?
Ramos
Telford
Evans
Lofthouse
Jeba
McD
DSJ
Moore
Moore
Ballweg
vs
Gilman
Clark
Turk
Sorensen
Kemmerer
Marianelli
Brooks
Burak
Stoll
JRent
Mejia
I think we're doing just fine on the recruiting front without Doug. Now we have to produce results on the mat.
Umm there are multiple national titles in one group and none in the other. Actually a lot of hope they are in the other. Plus Doug was with Tom at VT so you are missing Metcalf, Jaybo etc. Your point may end up being valid but likely 2-3 years away from knowing that. Although Gilman and Clark can work on equaling McD/ Ramos as of this weekend. Not having multiple 25 point individuals scorers is why we are not winning team titles. Quality over quantity. Well unless you are a fan of a dual deciding the team title.
IMO we lost some good recruiting in Doug. I think he had a knack with relationships the kids that had been missing. But that being said Doug also doesn't get to wear the Iowa wrestling brand name when he walks in the house anymore. Doug with an Iowa shirt on is a bit more dangerous than being asked where is Cedar Falls located by a parent? I like UNI but Doug shouldn't retire there if a big name job opens up soon. I think UNI has a ceiling that will hold him slightly back. Imagine Doug at say Pitt, Rutgers or something like that where he is in a hotbed.
Umm there are multiple national titles in one group and none in the other. Actually a lot of hope they are in the other. Plus Doug was with Tom at VT so you are missing Metcalf, Jaybo etc. Your point may end up being valid but likely 2-3 years away from knowing that. Although Gilman and Clark can work on equaling McD/ Ramos as of this weekend. Not having multiple 25 point individuals scorers is why we are not winning team titles. Quality over quantity. Well unless you are a fan of a dual deciding the team title.
IMO we lost some good recruiting in Doug. I think he had a knack with relationships the kids that had been missing. But that being said Doug also doesn't get to wear the Iowa wrestling brand name when he walks in the house anymore. Doug with an Iowa shirt on is a bit more dangerous than being asked where is Cedar Falls located by a parent? I like UNI but Doug shouldn't retire there if a big name job opens up soon. I think UNI has a ceiling that will hold him slightly back. Imagine Doug at say Pitt, Rutgers or something like that where he is in a hotbed.
That is what would concern me the most if I were a die hard Hawk fan. They should be in the discussion for every top recruit. I am not sure the Valencias considered Iowa either, although that was kind of a freak situation with the new coach and everyone all excited about ASU.The thing that concerns me most about recruiting is that a large percentage of the best recruits never even consider us. Hall, for example, had a list of 5 schools that he was considering. Iowa, which was like 3-4 hours away from where he lives, wasn't even a school he was considering. How is that possible with Iowa's tradition and resources? It has been all too common and is one of the reasons that our last top 5 recruit before marinelli was mike Evans, who was here for 5 years and has been gone for over a year. I love the brands bros myself, but IMO their hard core, balls to the wall approach puts off a lot of young kids. We simply can't compete for a national championship year in and year out if we aren't getting top 5 and top 10 kids every year like PSU and Ohio state are doing.
Of course, recruiting isn't the whole story. You have to develop your talent, which we do in some cases. But it seems to me a lot of kids never really develop past their first couple years in the room into elite wrestlers we expect them to become (Evans, lofthouse, gambrall, Nate and Nick Moore, Telford, dziewa, anyone named ballweg, Carew, kelly, etc). I'll keep current wrestlers out of the discussion because the jury's still out on a lot of them, but a number of them are following the same path IMO.
On top of that, our retention of our wrestlers is an issue. Losing guys we count on like Skon, gross, baldosaro, berge is killing us.
I think the part in bold is more myth than anything. I agree with much of what you say, but I think you're buying into a concept that non-Iowa folks like to perpetuate.The thing that concerns me most about recruiting is that a large percentage of the best recruits never even consider us. Hall, for example, had a list of 5 schools that he was considering. Iowa, which was like 3-4 hours away from where he lives, wasn't even a school he was considering. How is that possible with Iowa's tradition and resources? It has been all too common and is one of the reasons that our last top 5 recruit before marinelli was mike Evans, who was here for 5 years and has been gone for over a year. I love the brands bros myself, but IMO their hard core, balls to the wall approach puts off a lot of young kids. We simply can't compete for a national championship year in and year out if we aren't getting top 5 and top 10 kids every year like PSU and Ohio state are doing.
Of course, recruiting isn't the whole story. You have to develop your talent, which we do in some cases. But it seems to me a lot of kids never really develop past their first couple years in the room into elite wrestlers we expect them to become (Evans, lofthouse, gambrall, Nate and Nick Moore, Telford, dziewa, anyone named ballweg, Carew, kelly, etc). I'll keep current wrestlers out of the discussion because the jury's still out on a lot of them, but a number of them are following the same path IMO.
On top of that, our retention of our wrestlers is an issue. Losing guys we count on like Skon, gross, baldosaro, berge is killing us.
That's the only place where I disagree, look. Of course, there are top recruits we haven't landed, but we're getting more, and I think that trend will continue.Whatever the reason that the Hawks are not getting the top recruits, one thing seems certain. The Brands are not going to sell their soul to land someone. They are straight shooters and honest people and that says a lot about them. I as a parent of a potential recruit, would trust them implicitly. I can't say that about all the other coaches. I am not saying that I have a kid who would ever be recruited by Iowa, but rather if I did have such a child, that is how I would feel.
I don't think this is true. Depending on the year you're talking about, you had Jeva, Moore, St John, Lofthouse, and Telfors who were all top 100. Most of them were top 50 and I think some in top 25.We still got VERY good wrestlers but for those 4 years when Mike Evans was around he was the only top 100 wrestle on the roster I believe. I have heard others say that in the past.
We still got VERY good wrestlers but for those 4 years when Mike Evans was around he was the only top 100 wrestle on the roster I believe. I have heard others say that in the past.
.
That's way off. There were 7 in his class alone. Baldasaro and Ballweg didn't make it all 5 years but Dziewa, Telford, Moore and Kelly (plus Evans) all did. Dziewa, Evans, Moore and Telford were all big timers.
The Brands themselves need to be out recruiting these studs. Cael is out there recruiting. It's nice that M* is the point man, but the Brands need to be closing.