The parent will join their child in "the system" if they are found culpable. IMO, that's a much better reason for sending someone to prison than smoking weed.
You're still really lousy at this.
Winder, GA - haven't had a school shooting thread in a while
- Thread starter funksouljon
- Start date
You're still really lousy at this.
Kind of crazy that 8 kids were shot
but are expected to survive when Joy Behar said if you shoot a deer with an AR there will be ‘nothing left’.
And once again the FIB dropped the ball with someone on their radar.
but are expected to survive when Joy Behar said if you shoot a deer with an AR there will be ‘nothing left’.
And once again the FIB dropped the ball with someone on their radar.
Thus proving assault rifles are no more dangerous than any other gun. I mean, if somebody gets a detail wrong about guns that nullifies all arguments.
I don't think so. Everyone knows God is a Notre Dame fan.
Kind of crazy that you know what Joy Behar had to say about shooting a deer with an AR.
You are the ine who brought weed into this and it's incredibly unlikely a parent is going to be removed from a home due to weed in 2024.
Again you went with your feelings because you don't think things through.
Mom
17
12 <Kid now in system because "mom" is doing time for "17" sins.
I watched a video yesterday on a dillinger that fires .223 at some point you guys are going to learn physics don't care about how scary it is because it's black.
It's really too bad that there are no other countries in the developed world that have been able to implement policies that make mass shootings (and gun deaths in general) exceedingly rare.
The guns don't fire themselves. The problem is with people. The kid threatened to do this one year before. The FBI knew it. The local sheriff knew it.
The kids in his class are quoted as saying
"It doesn't surprise me" "if someone were going to do it it would be him"
But
We live in a society of pussies so we can't hurt that kids feelings......
Sarcasm?
There are other countries with high gun ownership that don't have this problem. There are also countries with virtually no private gun ownership that have mass shootings.
I think gun owners should be required to carry an ungodly amount of insurance for injuries caused by their weapons. Goes for any sale.
Surprised a liberal state hasn’t successfully filed a lawsuit against a gun maker yet.
Everybody is stupid.
Too stupid to lock up their weapons from kids.
Too stupid to manage credit, alcohol, drugs, etc.
Gun shows should be ended also. No longer want your gun? Shouldn’t have bought it in the first place.
Surprised a liberal state hasn’t successfully filed a lawsuit against a gun maker yet.
Everybody is stupid.
Too stupid to lock up their weapons from kids.
Too stupid to manage credit, alcohol, drugs, etc.
Gun shows should be ended also. No longer want your gun? Shouldn’t have bought it in the first place.
It's less likely a parent will be "removed from the home" for allowing their child access to their guns that are used to harm others. That's the point. But you're either too stupid or too tied to your love of guns to recognize it. Probably both.
A 14 year old kid (or 12) who does something like this needs to be in the "system". If mom gave him access to the firearms negligently then she should face severe consequences too.
If you own a gun it is your responsibility to ensure it is used safely and is secured at all times. But I suspect you don't want that kind of responsibility. Figures.
The problem is the people who will do these things have easy access to guns giving them the opportunity to cause more death and destruction than if they did not have access to the guns.
It's very obvious you cannot defend what you said so are trying to deflect with "weed" and "gun nut" dumb shit.
Riley, if you take parents out of homes for the actions of their children you are going to find the population that has both the highest rate of shootings as well as the highest rate of single parenting in a very bad spot. One might go so far as to call THAT systemic racism, God forbid I try to walk you through understanding that concept.
Go sit in the corner radio.
After Sandy Hook it was official...this country puts guns over children. We just do or this wouldn't be happening. Dead children and teachers in school became acceptable.
This is one of your dumber arguments. That's quite an accomplishment because you have said some really, really stupid shit on here.
The point being made is we need laws that require gun owners to secure their guns at all times. The vast majority of responsible gun owners agree with this. Leaving guns around for anyone to take is irresponsible. Giving a gun to a kid and not supervising them is irresponsible. Letting someone who has made threats to shoot up a school have access to your guns is irresponsible. There is no reason that these actions, if found to be negligent, shouldn't result in punishment for the gun owner or provider. Whether that is a parent, other family member a friend or a stranger has nothing to do with it.
Now, regarding your argument - I'm guessing your an advocate for letting non-violent criminals who are parents out of jail so they can do their job as a parent? No, you don't. You don't care about the parenting issue at all. It's just your latest lame attempt to deflect from any common sense gun control measures.
You're as bad at this as you must be at your 4 jobs given the amount of time you spend on here.
This tired old narrative. Again, other countries don't have mass shootings. Other countries DO have mental health issues. Other countries DO have violent video games. THEY just don't have more guns than people. We do. It's the guns no matter how much you guys try to explain it away.
I'm asking. That's a pressing question in this matter for me. How was this kid, who had threatened to shoot up a school before, able to get a gun and shoot up a school?
For some reason, liberals ignore black guys with hand guns.
They much prefer a white dude with an AR.
Reading comprehension is tough. But I don't like gun violence anywhere, including Chicago, but I don't single them out. Wonder why you would? Certainly not because it has been political football.
No one is ignoring anything. Some of us are proposing measures to make it harder for people who shouldn't have guns to get them. Others of you are trying desperately to deflect from that goal.
^this is 100% fluff.
Again, Riley, think about the long term impacts of what you just said.
"Your child has been arrested 12 times for gang related activities and now has committed a crime with a firearm, a firearm we can prove you knew to be in the house, tell your other kids goodbye ma'am, your inability to parent your 17 year old just turned your 3 other kids into wards of the state.
Again, fluff, because you have no basis.
Fluff.
Radio.
The sad part is they are praying this is actually a "white kid with a gun".....
So easy to completely destroy your arguments after which all youre left is babble.
Carry on.
So you and WhiskeyDumbass are suggesting this tragedy is the fault of the students being "pussies"? Another interesting and moronic take. But not surprising.
Why would a gun manufacturer be liable for an illegal act using their product? Are you going to extend that logic to manufacturers of other products used to kill people?
