It’s not good but the spin that’s being put on it from right media is unconscionableLot of fodder for the Rs. Found to be willful which is not good and can’t be charged as his memory is too bad and jury would feel sorry for him. This was worse than I expected.
On balance I think he did ok at the presserTold ya he had dementia
I was focusing on the Willfully Retaining Documents. Either way, yes, Trump did this to himself.
The parts of the report that call into question Biden’s mental faculties would be a lot more damning, but it won’t be discussed on the MSM channels. I’ve already seen that on CNN and MSNBC. We’ll see if ABC, CBS, and NBC discuss it.
Told ya he had dementia
Just another piece in the puzzleWhen hasn’t his mental faculties been called into question recently? Quite honestly, I don’t see why they belonged in the report. You only do that if you want to embarrass someone imo.
Oh yes, the opinion of a special prosecutor with no medical background should be taken as incontrovertible proof.
Dude, didn't you see Hueys posts? The Whitehouse had nothing to brace for with this.
Both sides! Tom here's your chance to call out someone using both sides! Where are ya?
Didn't he also have documents from his time as senator?Did you read the report? You are conflating the statutory definition with a common sense definition.
The statute requires that he received the documents knowingly and “without authority.” He had authority - he received them as the VP. His home is also an authorized location.
The fact that the SC spent about 1 page of a 388 page report on Section 1924 should tell you something.
YAHTZEE!!!!!Why was he talking about Cici in Mexico when asked about the hostage situation in Gaza? Then he switched to Bibi in Israel. Wtf?
Didn't he also have documents from his time as senator?
From what I am reading, he did not know when he was VP and he could not recall when his son died even within a few years. Very sad.When hasn’t his mental faculties been called into question recently? Quite honestly, I don’t see why they belonged in the report. You only do that if you want to embarrass someone imo.
Oh yes, the opinion of a special prosecutor with no medical background should be taken as incontrovertible proof.
He did well. One of his better press conferences as of late.On balance I think he did ok at the presser
His press conference was fine. Little ornery but to be expected.
Miss the part about him confusing Egypt and Mexico?On balance I think he did ok at the presser
Yes.Didn't he also have documents from his time as senator?
Thanks for the insight.Don’t know. The report doesn’t mention but the Senate website says all senators are authorized recipients of classified information and those on a couple committees are authorized at higher levels.
My second paragraph hit on Trump’s obstruction and other stupid shit.trump was asked a couple of times to return docs, he returned some and kept some and the FBI went in and searched and even then they didn't search a couple of locked rooms which was stupid and on them. The two situations are not completely alike by a lot. Biden knew he had them a few years ago and stupidly di not return them. MSNBC di discuss the it and Hur's comments were out of line. I didn't see Jack Smith calling trump an old man that lies through his teeth everyday.
Yea, Hur said why he wasn’t charge. Jury feeling sorry for old forgetful man.That's not the reason he wasn't charged. There was a big difference between trump and Biden's cases.
How does this make sense though. Since when is age a barrier to indictments?Yea, Hur said why he wasn’t charge. Jury feeling sorry for old forgetful man.![]()
Don’t forget poor memory. Joe, is that you?The report seems pretty negligent imo. So they have strong evidence of wrongdoing but are electing not to prosecute because they believe Biden to be too kindly and sympathetically old to be convicted? This doesn't square.
Didn’t think he could get a jury to convict. Old Uncle Joe is just not all there.How does this make sense though. Since when is age a barrier to indictments?
Which means that they don't actually have any evidence of him being negligent but they really needed something else to run on besides the border so they had to manufacture something with this. Unfortunately, people will probably treat this like Hillary's emails and make this far more credible than it really is.The report seems pretty negligent imo. So they have strong evidence of wrongdoing but are electing not to prosecute because they believe Biden to be too kindly and sympathetically old to be convicted? This doesn't square.
They certainly said he shared classified documents which he then lied about in his presser.Doj did not say that.
Robert Hur said that and he works for the DoJDoj did not say that.
Even that doesn't make sense. Biden sounded really good during his presser. He was on point, focused, and sharp. In fact everytime he has a major speech he kills it. He got the Rs to agree to not touch entitlements during his SOTU for chrissakeDon’t forget poor memory. Joe, is that you?
They did not say he was not competent to stand trial. Period.They certainly said he shared classified documents which he then lied about in his presser.
That actually should be the bigger story from this but it won’t be.
So he has provable crimes but is passing simply because Biden is too nice a guy? That makes zero sense.Didn’t think he could get a jury to convict. Old Uncle Joe is just not all there.
I have to say I’d have paid good money to be a fly on the wall in the back room with the press office when he started walking back to the podium to talk about Gaza.Even that doesn't make sense. Biden sounded really good during his presser. He was on point, focused, and sharp. In fact everytime he has a major speech he kills it. He got the Rs to agree to not touch entitlements during his SOTU for chrissake
So how is it that he can kill one speech and presser after another but somehow can't remember being VP or his own son's death? It just doesn't pass the smell test.