One or maybe two seasons out of a sample size of fifteen is hardly indication that one type of schedule is advantageous. It is akin to saying the big xii was balanced north and south even though the results (11 conference championships for the South) clearly show differently.
College football is not at all the same it was 'back in the day of the good ole big xii' in many respects. For one example, Baylor is now a 'power' as opposed to a pushover. Funny how most any other team that can be named there is an example of how that team progressed (more than just perhaps the one-off season or so). Today, football is all about excelling and competing for a spot in the playoff picture. If that is not the objective, or if that is not attainable, then it is time to reassess and to move on to allow those programs that are striving to try to be the best the opportunity to compete with like programs.
Thus far, in this single thread, we have isu fans that state winning (not academics) is all that counts. We also have the sheepish admission that isu cannot/will not compete in football. If this is not one of the most pathetic things to ever have been put forth here concerning the condition of isu athletics, then I do not know what is.