Some folks slept through high school economics.People are living longer.
People are working longer
The fund itself is drying up and those changes will help keep it solvent.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Some folks slept through high school economics.People are living longer.
People are working longer
The fund itself is drying up and those changes will help keep it solvent.
I think the employee level of tax. Yes. Not both employer and employee.So, you think people should pay a 15.3% tax on interest, dividends, capital gains, rental income, etc., in addition to income tax??
That’s fine and it’s your choice. If you can live on your projected retirement income then go for it,I have no interest whatsoever in working longer.
I will absolutely agree with you on disability. 💯 agree. It should be harder to get and once you’re on it should be reviewed more often. There should be a list of conditions that automatically qualify and then others you can apply.The reality is this, the old liberal mantra about just up the taxes on the rich is nothing but a scam. The 1% (rich) in this country pay 99% of all the taxes anyway. You can only get so much milk out of a cow and increasing the taxes on the 1% in this country every other day will ultimately backfire.
The SS fund is going dry, collecting benefits as young as 62 is ridiculous the minimum age must be raised somewhere between 66 - 70. I would prefer it be 70.
People working longer provides many benefits, it allows them more time to save for retirement, it allows them more time to contribute to social security and extends the life of the SS fund.
Social Security disability is in need of 100% total overhaul, you have perfectly healthy people in their 20's and 30's ripping off the system collecting disability when only a 6 month diet would get them up and off of collecting our tax money.
They make most of the money. They have most of the real assets. Sounds perfectly fair to me.The top 1% currently pay right at 43% of all taxes collected.
Sounds fair to me. 🙄
First part of your post I heartily agree with .I will absolutely agree with you on disability. 💯 agree. It should be harder to get and once you’re on it should be reviewed more often. There should be a list of conditions that automatically qualify and then others you can apply.
The rich don’t pay 99% of taxes. Not even close. If you include all taxes it isn’t even close to 50%. The right trots this rich pays the majority of taxes when they want to cut for the rich but they conveniently only include one specific set of tax, federal income tax. Ignoring all the regressive taxes that the non rich pay
First part of your post I heartily agree with .
As to the second part about “the rich” they still pay a hugely disproportionate share of the total revenue and they are only using every legal deduction and avenue of deferment the current laws allow. If you don’t like that then work to get the laws changed or support one of the various fair tax alternatives.
People love to throw out the Warren Buffett Secretary story which he cleverly threw out there but if you wanna see some screaming then just wait until someone introduces a bill to tax unearned/deferred/passive income.
All income should be taxed when realized. All taxes should apply.First part of your post I heartily agree with .
As to the second part about “the rich” they still pay a hugely disproportionate share of the total revenue and they are only using every legal deduction and avenue of deferment the current laws allow. If you don’t like that then work to get the laws changed or support one of the various fair tax alternatives.
People love to throw out the Warren Buffett Secretary story which he cleverly threw out there but if you wanna see some screaming then just wait until someone introduces a bill to tax unearned/deferred/passive income.
Federal Income tax is "always" what Biden and his ilk are referring to when they spout off about raising taxes.I will absolutely agree with you on disability. 💯 agree. It should be harder to get and once you’re on it should be reviewed more often. There should be a list of conditions that automatically qualify and then others you can apply.
The rich don’t pay 99% of taxes. Not even close. If you include all taxes it isn’t even close to 50%. The right trots this rich pays the majority of taxes when they want to cut for the rich but they conveniently only include one specific set of tax, federal income tax. Ignoring all the regressive taxes that the non rich pay
Income should be taxed when realized as active.All income should be taxed when realized. All taxes should apply.
Newsflash skippy…YOU live better than about 98% of the world’s population.They live better that 99.999% of the worlds population...they should be paying 90% of the fvcking taxes
The dems like to complain that wealthy people pay less in taxes that their secretary, housekeeper, etc. That is untrue. People in American as required by the Constitution, only pay taxes on income. So if someone owns a lot of stocks or other assets, may be considered rich on paper but they only pay taxes on any income they make. That is how Buffet claims his secretary makes less than him, everything she makes is income where Buffet doesn't pay taxes on his investment gains unless they are realized. So the left's newest attempt to change America is to try and tax unearned income. Like gains from the market or an increase in value of real estate holdings, etc. Those are not taxable per the Constitution, unless and until that income is realized. It is also completely unworkable, so if ones stock portfolio goes down, can he/she get a credit from the IRS for their unearned loss?So, I agree that the rich pay most of the taxes in this country.
But, I don't understand the Bold #1 part, at all. Claiming unearned income as income?
Bold #2 - Borrow against assets to avoid paying taxes on income? Huh?
Bold #3 - Corporations cannot "simply pass on their tax burden to consumers". Oh, they can try, but the market and competition drives prices. Please note that prices didn't drop when corporate tax rates went down.
Not trying to bash your assertions. Simply trying to understand them.
Not at the percent the middle class pays. They remain billionaires while a lot of the middle class lives paycheck to paycheck. Yet here Republican voters are, wanting to take away their own SS. Damn, again, the wealthy love the way you think.Top 1% of earners pay 40% of income tax, but, yeah, we don’t tax rich people. JFC.
They want us to work until we die. Every other country people work to live. Here, Republicans want us to live to work. We get a lot wrong all in the name of making wealthy people more money.It’s always a matter of choice/opportunity/circumstances.
I retired and was looking forward to it and planned all sorts of projects and stuff. After a year I was so bored I just jumped at a part time job that I did for three years and enjoyed. After COVID I decided I should get out and about while I was still in reasonable health so I retired again at 71. I made friends there who were in a similar situation and just wanted to earn a few dollars to pay for travel. The point is that more of us are living longer and are willing able and interested in remaining in the workplace.
Exhibit A is our current ballot choices in November.
Congress recognizes this and has already raised the age at which we’re required to start the 401/IRA RMD.
The truth is it’s not the 1930’s anymore and life expectancy has extended and the workplace has drastically been altered.
The ONE area where they have an advantage? Holy crap!The dems like to complain that wealthy people pay less in taxes that their secretary, housekeeper, etc. That is untrue. People in American as required by the Constitution, only pay taxes on income. So if someone owns a lot of stocks or other assets, may be considered rich on paper but they only pay taxes on any income they make. That is how Buffet claims his secretary makes less than him, everything she makes is income where Buffet doesn't pay taxes on his investment gains unless they are realized. So the left's newest attempt to change America is to try and tax unearned income. Like gains from the market or an increase in value of real estate holdings, etc. Those are not taxable per the Constitution, unless and until that income is realized. It is also completely unworkable, so if ones stock portfolio goes down, can he/she get a credit from the IRS for their unearned loss?
My comment about the rich not paying taxes on borrowed money. This is one area where the rich have a advantage. They can borrow money against stock or real estate holdings and that money is considered a loan not income so they avoid taxes. But again, anyone can do that but most people don't have enough personal wealth to take advantage. But they have to pay interest, etc. as well.
Yet your party wants to make it harder for him to do that.That’s fine and it’s your choice. If you can live on your projected retirement income then go for it,
Perhaps infused with cash from "stock bonuses", etc the execs get...And with the increases in executive pay the cap should be reviewed on a periodic basis.
Just because they live longer doesn’t mean they are able to work. People pay into that since they were teenagers. Ridiculous to make them work until they are frail and losing it mentally.People are living longer.
People are working longer
The fund itself is drying up and those changes will help keep it solvent.
What’s amusing is you use the phrase ‘take it away’, as though the Ponzi would’ve worked if only the proceeds hadn’t been absconded with.Not at the percent the middle class pays. They remain billionaires while a lot of the middle class lives paycheck to paycheck. Yet here Republican voters are, wanting to take away their own SS. Damn, again, the wealthy love the way you think.
Newsflash skippy…YOU live better than about 98% of the world’s population.
You’re right.Just because they live longer doesn’t mean they are able to work. People pay into that since they were teenagers. Ridiculous to make them work until they are frail and losing it mentally.
Im trying to find a rich lawyer to pay my tax debts like Hunter did.Yea, I know...and I paid more in fvcking taxes than your boy Trump, for example, in a number of years
Im trying to find a rich lawyer to pay my tax debts like Hunter did.
Don’t raise the rate, just take the cap completely off, if you want to raise the rate, then increase what someone making over 150k gets back in ss
I don't think that's true. I think he was saying the tax RATE he paid on his taxable income was lower than his secretary.The dems like to complain that wealthy people pay less in taxes that their secretary, housekeeper, etc. That is untrue. People in American as required by the Constitution, only pay taxes on income. So if someone owns a lot of stocks or other assets, may be considered rich on paper but they only pay taxes on any income they make. That is how Buffet claims his secretary makes less than him, everything she makes is income where Buffet doesn't pay taxes on his investment gains unless they are realized. So the left's newest attempt to change America is to try and tax unearned income. Like gains from the market or an increase in value of real estate holdings, etc. Those are not taxable per the Constitution, unless and until that income is realized. It is also completely unworkable, so if ones stock portfolio goes down, can he/she get a credit from the IRS for their unearned loss?
My comment about the rich not paying taxes on borrowed money. This is one area where the rich have a advantage. They can borrow money against stock or real estate holdings and that money is considered a loan not income so they avoid taxes. But again, anyone can do that but most people don't have enough personal wealth to take advantage. But they have to pay interest, etc. as well.
Under the current SS system, increasing the cap (or taxing other income) would also raise the benefit for those people. So, it might help short term but in the long term we'd probably be in a similar position.I am willing to just take the cap off and leave the rate untouched and find out where that gets us.
If it doesn't get us far enough than we certainly should start looking for additional income. I might consider a capital gains surcharge or something like that so that the nation's billionares can contribute personally to social security. Since most of them don't make much money in terms of wages, they likely don't contribute a lot personally to SS. That is one place where we might be able to get additional income.
I'm not entirely opposed to raising the rate on money over a certain amount either but I'm not sure it would be necessary to do that.
Under the current SS system, increasing the cap (or taxing other income) would also raise the benefit for those people. So, it might help short term but in the long term we'd probably be in a similar position.
Wow dude. An anecdote. You're good at debate.According to Warren Buffet, his secretary pays a higher rate than he does…..most corporations pay very little if any taxes….Rifler….other than your obstinanced, you have very little to stand upon here.
LOL sure thing BroYea, I know...and I paid more in fvcking taxes than your boy Trump, for example, in a number of years
When the system (SS) pays out more to you than you ever put in, the fund is bound to run out.Not at the percent the middle class pays. They remain billionaires while a lot of the middle class lives paycheck to paycheck. Yet here Republican voters are, wanting to take away their own SS. Damn, again, the wealthy love the way you think.
Trump? Administrations have been diverting those funds for decades.The stated intent sounds good.
My issue is a Trump WH will start diverting funding for other projects if they decide a surplus is too large.
Are you one of the idiots that believes corporations pay taxes? LOL! Corporations only collect taxes, they never actually pay taxes. Taxes are always added into the price of their product, it does not come out of their income. I worked in accounting at Rockwell, every time we priced any product, we had a line item for taxes. We never reduced out income to cover additional tax rate hikes.The “rich” should pay a majority of taxes, dumbass….they are the ones with the money! They should probably pay more…..why should a working stiff who punches “in and out” daily pay a higher percentage of his/her wagers than a “rich” person? Why shouldn’t a corporation pay income taxes? Corporations are nothing more than tax dodges…..we all understand that!
Trump is not my boy but you know that.Yea, I know...and I paid more in fvcking taxes than your boy Trump, for example, in a number of years
Like our two ballot beauties for President?Just because they live longer doesn’t mean they are able to work. People pay into that since they were teenagers. Ridiculous to make them work until they are frail and losing it mentally.
Jeezus Tom you are a sad fellow. I’m glad you can blow a whistle and bounce a ball.They want us to work until we die. Every other country people work to live. Here, Republicans want us to live to work. We get a lot wrong all in the name of making wealthy people more money.
Yell it all you want but they are hiring accountants and tax lawyers who help them find deductions that have been put in place by our government.Yea, fvck him too...fvck any rich prick that's gaming the system
See how that's done
It is, isn’t it?All income should be taxed when realized.
I’m wealthy, and yes, I love the way I think.Not at the percent the middle class pays. They remain billionaires while a lot of the middle class lives paycheck to paycheck. Yet here Republican voters are, wanting to take away their own SS. Damn, again, the wealthy love the way you think.