Lotta pressure on 1 guy though, when it shouldn't have to be that way all the time.
Gonna have some fans haranguing him for having a 'bad' night when he puts up a 25/8 effort and Iowa loses by a few points.
****Indiana vs Iowa Game Thread****
- Thread starter QChawks
- Start date
-
- Tags
- qcpizzasucks
Gonna have some fans haranguing him for having a 'bad' night when he puts up a 25/8 effort and Iowa loses by a few points.
Yeah, that officiating crew had some real head scratchers.
I agree. I do wish he would force it more. It's better than watching Tony or Ulis force anything
It really was a fun game. Especially since I only got to watch the second half!
Give up 50 in the first half. Score 51 in the second half. Typical Iowa basketball under Fran. It is certainly not boring.
Kris and Philip were fantastic tonight. Unfortunately, they will have to perform like that every night for this team to be successful.
Kris and Philip were fantastic tonight. Unfortunately, they will have to perform like that every night for this team to be successful.
If Thompson is out all season, I can see Indiana going into a tailspin. Jackson-Davis and their one guard were excellent. After those two Indiana didn’t look great.
yep. your good players have to play well. who would have thought.
Boys and girls get to Carver and support this team! The crowd helped carry this team to the final buzzer and the crowd was savage tonight despite a less than full arena. Great game tonight.
No, want them sharp for the fights. The feeding would be the surprise ending, like Dylan doing a second encore.
And if Keegan doesn't go pro we win by 20???? If If If
really? you really think that? no not really? must be your Fran hate speaking.
Lot of positives off the bench. Dix looked good. Mulvey while undeveloped was given great effort. Not ready to call him a miss yet. While not sure he’ll be starting soon I do think he can develop into a player who brings a lot off the bench.
it was the right call, IU had already been warned for grabbing the ball after a basket.
the rule is: if you have a hold of the rim while the ball is over or in the cylinder it is offensive interference, (goal tending).
I’m late to this, but hands on the rim changes any bounce that happens. Should absolutely be automatic goaltending on the offense or defense.
based on how the game was officiated that was 100% a no call…..later you will see the same type of play on our end not called
there is opinion and there is hate showing your stupidity.
WRONG
this comment was in context of when Iowa was playing zone in second Half
Will wait for apology
WRONG
In your world any criticism of PMac for his well known deficiency in playing defense Is hate?
says the poster That comes in late and only hates on others posts
that’s called trolling
WRONG, WRONG and WRONG
FACT Dix has played well in his minutes
FACT Dix doesn’t get many minutes
FACT Fran is in charge of minutes
TROLL. It must be you hating Fran for presentation of pure FACTS
I’m scratching my head as to why Mulvey (and Ogundule) hasn’t gotten a few more minutes this year. From what little we’ve seen he doesn’t seem to be hurting us and he against teams with a true center he is a better defensive alternative than Murray - we don’t want him in foul trouble.
some people are actually watching the game not posting negatives on here
Thought Mulvey showed good energy when he was out there. Attacked the offensive glass hard and got a foul called and almost came up with the steal on the press.
So I, like many others on here, thought the rule was clear cut: no touching the rim while the ball is over the rim. HOWEVER, I don't think thats the rule. Here is the rule from the 2021-2022 NCAA Rulebook:
Section 15. Basket Interference and Goaltending
Art. 1. It is a violation to commit basket interference or goaltending.
Art. 2. Basket interference.
a. Basket interference occurs when a player:
1. Touches the ball or any part of the basket while the ball is on or within the basket. If the touching of the basket involves contact with the net only, the official must determine if the touching had any effect on the ball which would rise to the level of basket interference;
2. Touches the ball while any part of it is within the cylinder that has the ring as its lower base;
3. Reaches through the basket from below and touches the ball before it enters the cylinder;
4. Pulls down a movable ring so that it contacts the ball before the ring returns to its original position; and
5. Causes the basket or backboard to vibrate when the ball is on or within the basket or the backboard and/or is on or in the cylinder.
b. The cylinder is the imaginary geometric figure that has the ring as its base and is formed by the upward extension of that ring.
c. The ball shall be considered to be within the basket when any part of the ball is below the cylinder and the level of the ring.
d. A player may have a hand legally in contact with the ball, when this contact continues after the ball enters the cylinder or when, during such action, the player touches or grabs the basket.
So I think the question is whether the player touched the rim while the ball was on the rim, or caused the rim to vibrate. The ball was not on the rim when he touched it. Arguably he made the rim vibrate, but if we're being honest with ourselves, he didn't affect the shot at all.
Last edited:
As someone mentioned earlier in the thread, it is tough to win when you give up 90 points. It is a good thing we held them to 89.
Similar threads
