But you love us Rutgers fans , right ?
Dogs and Cats getting along...................what's next?
Mike
But you love us Rutgers fans , right ?
I'm in Love!Not interested. Fingers way too long and I bet she has cankles. Would not touch her.
To perhaps buy Indulgences from the moderator lest I be in future danger of a booting, here's a picture of a bikini babe to curry favor:
Let me clarify...Im in Love!
![]()
I'm in Love!
Pretty sure that's what the mat.com is.There should be an Island of Misfit Posters where all Trolls and the like should be sent. They could all then post on this Internet island of sorts to their heart's content without bothering regular folk.
Yes, I did.and by the way................
Did you ever get that monthly donation to HWC setup?
Mike
don't think you are on anyone's radar banger, i believe you have earned respect from the guys who know a little something.
So you're sayin' I've still got a chance?Not on mine..................yet.
Z
So Mike, I presume you will be posting the same thing on the Football board? There's a lot more smack on that site between Iowa/Nebraska/Minnie fans than on the wrestling site. Also, I'd say you've got some work to do on the Off Topic board as well.
He'll have to do better than that........spreadwide returns
IMO, criticizing George Mikan in comparison to say Kevin Durant does injustice to both. They were/are great in their own day and age. Or, how about discounting the 60s Packers in comparison to the current Patriots.I'd honestly flip Iowa and OSU. OSU may have more titles, but the competition was less rigorous while they were in dynasty mode as opposed to Iowa.
Your analogy does not go to the heart of my statement. I wasn't comparing individual wrestlers but the competition from one era to the next. The competition overall in the 20s and 30s was not equal to that of the 80s and 90s.IMO, criticizing George Mikan in comparison to say Kevin Durant does injustice to both. They were/are great in their own day and age. Or, how about discounting the 60s Packers in comparison to the current Patriots.
My father played for A. Alonzo Stagg @ Univ. of Chicago; today, he wouldn't be the water boy. All the champions are just that IMO.
Your analogy does not go to the heart of my statement. I wasn't comparing individual wrestlers but the competition from one era to the next. The competition overall in the 20s and 30s was not equal to that of the 80s and 90s.
I'll stand by my comment that earning a team title in the 80s and 90s was a more strenuous task than earning it in the 1920s, 30s and even 40s.Your history is a little off. The first NCAA championship was held in 1928 and Oklahoma State won team titles in every decade up to 2006. You can only win against the competition from your peers. One could argue that, relative to the era, the 1947 Cornell College team was one of the most dominant in the history of college wrestling and that from 1939 to the late '50s Iowa State Teachers College was a major factor in the sport.