Is Kanak uninterested?It’s official now. Iowa needs to get
out some more LB offers.
Is Kanak uninterested?It’s official now. Iowa needs to get
out some more LB offers.
Sounds like Nebraska is the leader. Crawford is working hard with him though.Is Kanak uninterested?
Wow. Thats sad.Sounds like Nebraska is the leader. Crawford is working hard with him though.
Still a long way to go. Having Crawford bagged up and helping with his recruitment really helps us.Wow. Thats sad.
Rairden rocking the Sun Devil T under the generics Iowa sweater someone gave him.
Sounds like Nebraska is the leader. Crawford is working hard with him though.
I’m just going off of Kanek getting listed as warm to Nebby.I heard K State is.
It would be worthwhile to mention where your info is coming from when saying things like "sounds like Nebraska is the leader."I’m just going off of Kanek getting listed as warm to Nebby.
That’s fair.It would be worthwhile to mention where your info is coming from when saying things like "sounds like Nebraska is the leader."
Example: "According to what I saw on 247 Sports"....
Even with Wallace rotating LBs more and packaging them more than we have in the past ... we're still mainly just featuring 2 ILB spots (with the LEO spot now "packaged"). Thus, one of our biggest need for LB-type bodies is on special teams ... and to help keep the level of LB-play high.It’s official now. Iowa needs to get
out some more LB offers.
What are the odds Nebby would be able to hire a good coach. Recent history would suggest the odds are not very good.You really have to wonder what the thought process is as it relates to Nebraska with these kids. Are they just willing to gamble that the Cornhuskers get a good coach after Frost is inevitably fired following the 2021 season? What if they don’t fit the new coach’s system?
Seems like a huge and unnecessary risk to me.
Maybe they could get Nick Saban.What are the odds Nebby would be able to hire a good coach. Recent history would suggest the odds are not very good.
Even with Wallace rotating LBs more and packaging them more than we have in the past ... we're still mainly just featuring 2 ILB spots (with the LEO spot now "packaged"). Thus, one of our biggest need for LB-type bodies is on special teams ... and to help keep the level of LB-play high.
That might be part of our difficulty with LB recruiting these days.
We certainly need to recruit some LBs for the class ... but I'm curious how the coaches perceive the "need."
Which might explain some of the Iowa high schoolers looking toward ISU in the 2022 class. I get the vibe that McLaughlin might have had some resentment about the rumors Iowa backed off from him earlier in the recruiting process only to renew interest in him later.Look at the '21 class. We are not having trouble recruiting lbers these days.
Yeah, they took a lot last class. What was it? 4?Look at the '21 class. We are not having trouble recruiting lbers these days.
Yes ... we've been landing good LBs. However, I was simply indicating that it is potentially a slightly "harder" sell to land LBs when your base D only features 2 starting LBs ... and you're coming off a recruiting class where you landed some high-end talents at LB.Look at the '21 class. We are not having trouble recruiting lbers these days.
Which might explain some of the Iowa high schoolers looking toward ISU in the 2022 class. I get the vibe that McLaughlin might have had some resentment about the rumors Iowa backed off from him earlier in the recruiting process only to renew interest in him later.
Doesn't really matter in the big picture, as Iowa is still "leaps and bounds" ahead of the Clones since games are won and lost at the LOS.
Yes ... we've been landing good LBs. However, I was simply indicating that it is potentially a slightly "harder" sell to land LBs when your base D only features 2 starting LBs ... and you're coming off a recruiting class where you landed some high-end talents at LB.
On top of that ... given what transpired last summer ... there is still the possibility that other programs are fiercely performing negative recruiting practices against Iowa. That can have some impact as well.
I imagine that the coaches thought that both McLaughlin and Imming were guys they liked ... and guys who would add value to the program. However, part of the offers could also be tied to the politics of maintaining positive relationships with the high school coaches. If the guys really want to be Hawkeyes and act fast enough ... then I'm certain that we happily would have taken Imming ... then shut down our LB recruiting.Both Imming and McLaughlin are ISU fans growing up. IMO Imming is a good player, McLaughlin not so much. Iowa wasn't spending all that much time on the latter.
In my uneducated opinion... there's three difference makers in the Iowa high school 2022 class... Xavier, Graves, and Deyo.
But that's mostly based on what they're rated, nationally.
Yeah, now that Urban Meyer is no longer available. ;-)Maybe they could get Nick Saban.
Bear Bryant isn’t up to much.Yeah, now that Urban Meyer is no longer available. ;-)
Wiseman out of Davenport is a monster.Talent wise I'd put Raridon in there...even tho he's a 3 star.
I understand Raridon. I wouldn’t worry too much about MRD. I think we have a very good chance with him. And we need 2 TE’s this cycle, since we didn’t get a single one in the class of 21.The logical conclusion to this TE offer is the staff might not be feeling all warm and fuzzy about Riley-Ducker and Raridon.
But that's just me.
I don't think that's unreasonable, but that's not the case here. Kid's gonna blow up BIG TIME, considering Michigan offered right after we did.The logical conclusion to this TE offer is the staff might not be feeling all warm and fuzzy about Riley-Ducker and Raridon.
But that's just me.
Agreed. Yelverton and Lachey look like nice pieces, but they haven’t proven anything yet. I’d be fine with MRD, Raridon, and Mcintosh.I wouldn’t be surprised if they took 3 TEs. Depending on how LaPorta plays this year he might be able to go pro and the depth isn’t great.
5'7", 195? That's a bowling ball!
Rivals says 5’9” 190. Either way...yes please.5'7", 195? That's a bowling ball!
247 says 5'7". Maybe he shrunk/grew between evaluations. 😉Rivals says 5’9” 190. Either way...yes please.