No, he quite literally is thought of as such. YOU'RE NUTS"top scientist in the world"???
Holy Shit you're nuts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, he quite literally is thought of as such. YOU'RE NUTS"top scientist in the world"???
Holy Shit you're nuts.
Speaking of misinformationYOU ARE LITERALLY THE DUMBEST PERSON ALIVE! MISINFORMATION MACHINE AND AN IDIOT!
We included only those studies on SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence that met the following criteriai)
Sampled any number of participants aged <70 years in a national representative sample.
(ii)
Sampling was completed by end February 2021 and at least 90% of the samples had been collected before the end January 2021 (to avoid the impact of vaccination on IFR calculations).
(iii)
Adults (≥21 years old) were included, regardless of whether children and/or adolescents were included or not.
(iv)
Provided an estimate of seroprevalence for non-elderly people (preferably for <70 years and/or <60 years, but any cut-off between 54 and 70 years was acceptable)
(v)
Explicitly aimed to generate samples reflecting the general population.
I'm not downplaying it at all, I'm saying we ignored the science on how to react to it.
We included only those studies on SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence that met the following criteria
No, he quite literally is thought of as such.
It's literally from the study. Good lord.Speaking of misinformation
And the study still indicates numbers that are 10x or more worse than influenza.It's literally from the study. Good lord.
No, you're an idiot and included a meta from a study in December 2020 when they didn't have the appropriate data in place with testing. This is just stupid and you were WRONG about the study I mentioned. Don't see where you acknowledged that. You're so stupid.So?
There's another meta-analysis that covered MORE studies.
Yes, he is.No. He's not.
No, you're an idiot and included a meta from a study in December 2020 when they didn't have the appropriate data in place with testing. This is just stupid and you were WRONG about the study I mentioned. Don't see where you acknowledged that. You're so stupid.
Yes, he is.
I never talked about flu idiot bag. The numbers are what they are.And the study still indicates numbers that are 10x or more worse than influenza.
Which is probably why deaths rates from Covid across most demographic groups are higher from Covid, than flu.
Three years’ worth of data proves the same point. The CDC reported that there have been a total of 325 deaths in children under 18 related to the flu since the 2018-2019 season.There were 136 pediatric flu deaths reported during the 2018-2019 season, 188 pediatric deaths reported in the 2019-2020 season and one death during the 2020-2021 season.For COVID-19, 349 kids have died in the last 18 months, which is when the pandemic began.Chang said that suggests COVID-19 is more transmissible than the flu, and likely more dangerous for children.Claims that the flu is more dangerous to children than COVID-19 are false.VERIFY: COVID-19 has caused more pediatric deaths than the flu in the last 18 months
CDC data shows COVID-19 and the flu make up less than 1% of all pediatric deaths since the start of the pandemic.www.khou.com
Everything You Should Know About the 2019 Coronavirus and COVID-19
Learn all about the 2019 coronavirus and COVID-19. Get the facts on symptoms, risk factors, treatment, prevention, masks, and more.www.healthline.com
EAT A GIANT DICK YOU PUSSY! YOU'RE WORTHLESSShut
The
Living
Phuck
Up
You
Demented
Phucking
Inbred
EAT A GIANT DICK YOU PUSSY! YOU'RE WORTHLESS
No, you're an idiot and included a meta from a study in December 2020
I never talked about flu
sped pussy.
In the lower age categories, no. And I don't care that you did. Giving clot shots to those age groups was a giant waste.Kewl. I did.
And the flu numbers are much better than Covid numbers.
I never argued that it wasn't worse than the flu. Come back down to earth.Your buddy DOES NOT make any comparison of influenza vs. Covid risks for IFR in his article that I can see. Covid risks are HIGHER, overall, than influenza, across all the age groups; this is why we have seen HIGHER deaths rates in every population compared to flu.
How many times did you eat your mother's snatch inbred?How many poles did you smoke for new year piggy????
How many times did you eat your mother's snatch inbred?
Munch, munch, munch, munch. probably bloody too, inbred.69, how many dongs did you suck off on news years, inbred?
In the lower age categories, no.
These two statements are mutually exclusive.In the lower age categories, no.
I never argued that it wasn't worse than the flu.
Munch, munch, munch, munch. probably bloody too, inbred.