You are right, he was the 2nd player. My bad.
Still not correct at all.
You are right, he was the 2nd player. My bad.
Who cares what Brommelkamp thinks? Are you posting that ONE TWEET from him (which is ONE opinion out there of MANY) just to be annoying?Okay well then you are having a different conversation that is hardly related to Devyn’s grievances with the university. Nine hours before the tweet that prompted this thread, he claimed not to have watched a single CBB game this year. So I highly doubt that his issues with Iowa began this year (let alone last weekend) or, again, have anything to do with Luka
Brommelkamp agrees:
Edit: and why do you insist on reposting tweets and information that you have already posted on this very page of this very thread? Just to be annoying?
Just my opinion, Roy Marble was the all-time leading scorer at Iowa for over thirty years. Since most sensible people have come to recognize addiction is a health issue, I'm not sure why that should give Roy the Pete Rose treatment.
Iowa should have retired his jersey at the ceremony they gave to honor him. Degree or not. Being the all-time scoring leader for over thirty years is special.
I don’t know the answer to this but maybe Roy would have been given a pass on the substance abuse issues if those were his only issues. Throw domestic violence charges in the mix and that really puts the university in a tough spot.
I’m sure then it would be some other ridiculous requirement...”DONT YOU KNOW YOU HAVE TO HAVE ABOVE A 3.9 GPA AT IOWA TO HAVE YOUR JERSEY RETIRED? ITS NOT THAT HARD”Just my opinion, Roy Marble was the all-time leading scorer at Iowa for over thirty years. Since most sensible people have come to recognize addiction is a health issue, I'm not sure why that should give Roy the Pete Rose treatment.
Iowa should have retired his jersey at the ceremony they gave to honor him. Degree or not. Being the all-time scoring leader for over thirty years is special.
I’m sure then it would be some other ridiculous requirement...”DONT YOU KNOW YOU HAVE TO HAVE ABOVE A 3.9 GPA AT IOWA TO HAVE YOUR JERSEY RETIRED? ITS NOT THAT HARD”
Roy should have had his number retired. Period. End of story. It's not a sportsmanship award. It's not a contract with a moral turpitude clause. Roy was a stud at Iowa in his years as a Hawk, as is Luka. Roy got jobbed. Barta can still fix this posthumously. I bet even Luka would agree.
Yea you're right but my guess is that this is not a isolated incident and has been building for a substantial period of time. DM finally exploded and that wasn't a classy look.Could be. But Dev handled it about as poorly as he could have.
I think it would make someone obsessed with race wonder. Then the facts will stomp out their unnecessary bias.
Roy Marble was a great player for Iowa but he wasn't even considered AP National Player of the Year, Naismith, or Wooden winner as far as I can remember. There are a lot of players that hold a scoring, rebound, assist, etc records for a time then they are passed. You can't retire every great players number, there are only so many numbers. I think Garza's recognition was due to his national awards while at Iowa, that has never been done before.Did Roy have off the court issues while he was a player? If not, why wouldn't his number be retired at the same time as Luka's?
Brommelkamp agrees:
If Brommelkamp were half as right/smart/funny as he thinks he is....
I would disagree that it doesn't make it complicated. "Having a Degree" is a fair and objective standard. Once an objective standard is compromised, it becomes subjective. Hence, open for opinion as to why. Many schools have similar requirements - see Duke for one.Again, no degree for Roy makes it complicated.
And Luka?
* Will have his degree
* 2 Time National Player of the Year (should be slam dunk)
* 2 Time Consensus All American (should be slam dunk)
* All Time Scoring Leader
I don’t know the answer to this but maybe Roy would have been given a pass on the substance abuse issues if those were his only issues. Throw domestic violence charges in the mix and that really puts the university in a tough spot.
Just my opinion, Roy Marble was the all-time leading scorer at Iowa for over thirty years. Since most sensible people have come to recognize addiction is a health issue, I'm not sure why that should give Roy the Pete Rose treatment.
Iowa should have retired his jersey at the ceremony they gave to honor him. Degree or not. Being the all-time scoring leader for over thirty years is special.
and other have brought up the domestic abuse issues, which i was not aware ofI would disagree that it doesn't make it complicated. "Having a Degree" is a fair and objective standard. Once an objective standard is compromised, it becomes subjective. Hence, open for opinion as to why. Many schools have similar requirements - see Duke for one.
I don’t know the answer to this but maybe Roy would have been given a pass on the substance abuse issues if those were his only issues. Throw domestic violence charges in the mix and that really puts the university in a tough spot.
The issues with Marble are not strictly limited to substance abuse.
there surely has to be a list where you have to check off each box (or most of them) before you get your number retired or your jersey raised (like BJ).Okay. So, for argument's sake, let's say Luka goes to the NBA and at some point some chick accuses him of sexual assault. Should his jersey be unretired?
I agree there are tough questions regarding Marble that don't have cut and dry answers.
Ding ding ding!!!Yep, it's a no win. If IOWA doesn't retire his jersey, they're racist. If they do, they're insensitive to violence against women. Either way they're wrong. Welcome to 2021
While I agree with you, you can bet his name will be included once ESPN talking heads get wind of this!This has nothing to do with Luka Garza
it almost felt like that ceremony at CHA was a celebration of his life while he was still with us where Hawk fans could cheer him one last timeI understand, I'm just saying it becomes a slippery slope. If Roy's sins were so egregious, then why honor him the way Barta did a few years back?
I don't know why, but it seems like we extend a lot of grace and forgiveness to our politicians and movie stars and great musicians, but not so much for our athletes and coaches.
there surely has to be a list where you have to check off each box (or most of them) before you get your number retired or your jersey raised (like BJ).
I would imagine that list would include things like:
* Did player get his degree
* Did player earn 1st Team All B1G
* Did player earn 1st Team All American
* Did player earn B1G Player of the Year
* Did player earn National Player of the Year
* Etc.
As others have noted, IOWA FOOTBALL has such a list for its different honors.
You are the person who always pulls tweets from journalists and claims them as authority in your arguments, so it’s a little surprising to see that what they have to say doesn’t matter when it isn’t convenient for you. Noted.Who cares what Brommelkamp thinks? Are you posting that ONE TWEET from him (which is ONE opinion out there of MANY) just to be annoying?
And going back to Dev's grievances, he has LONG THOUGHT that there is a double standard in how Iowa honors its players, both current (Luka) and past. So, YES, his grievances do have something to do with Luka. Dev thought that there were unfair double standards at the time of Roy's "celebration" at CHA, right before Roy died. And Dev thinks there's an unfair double standard NOW, with Luka's # about to be retired and Roy's not.
So, you can't talk about Dev's grievances without discussing why Luka's number is being retired & why all the other numbers got retired.
So, you are wrong. Luka is an obvious part of this conversation.
What does the media showing his highlights while his son played at Iowa have to do with Iowa not retiring his jersey? Iowa doesn’t control that.I agree the number should have been retired. I understand the reasons it wasn’t retired back in 1985 but should all that have still been held against him in 2015 when we do the awkward half step of giving him a framed jersey? Someone said lots of schools have a requirement that you get your degree before retiring the number. If so, it would be interesting to see how common that requirement is.
It’s all just awkward because Roy was a fairly prominent figure again all the years his son was here, they showed his highlights in practically every game, they showed him in the stands in TV all the time, and then we have this weird policy where because of some off the court problems 30 years ago we don’t feel like we can really honor him with a retired jersey. If I was Dev I would think that’s messed up too.
for football, it seems cut & dryOkay, great. So, the system is not an exact science.
Considering the ncaa didn't keep track of assists til 83 and the 3 pt line was added after BJ's freshman year those stats should be taken with a grain of salt....not saying he doesn't belong though. I thought it was weird Roy wasn't up there but if he really had to go to rehab while at Iowa, sorry Dev..... deal breaker. Cocaine is one helluva drug, or so I hearBJ made only two 2nd team all conference teams. But graduated as the all time leader in assists and 3pt shots while finishing 3rd in scoring and steals. But as has been mentioned, it is only his jersey retired, not the number.
What does this have to do with McC or anyone currently at Iowa?I have to imagine ISU fans are just salivating over this news. They probably are hoping Fran is racist or a bully or some other shit.
it almost felt like that ceremony at CHA was a celebration of his life while he was still with us where Hawk fans could cheer him one last time
it was weird to give him a framed jersey, imo; like he needed that? for what reason?
Just my opinion, Roy Marble was the all-time leading scorer at Iowa for over thirty years. Since most sensible people have come to recognize addiction is a health issue, I'm not sure why that should give Roy the Pete Rose treatment.
Iowa should have retired his jersey at the ceremony they gave to honor him. Degree or not. Being the all-time scoring leader for over thirty years is special.
You are the person who always pulls tweets from journalists and claims them as authority in your arguments, so it’s a little surprising to see that what they have to say doesn’t matter when it isn’t convenient for you. Noted.
By the way, if Brommelkamp’s tweet was an “opinion,” which is what you called it, then my post was also an opinion, and I cannot be wrong, which is also what you called it. Not today Fran! 😉