Scroll up and look at the article from the Quad cities TV station that links to a freedom of information act request from both Iowa and Iowa State, with all the documentation, showing that two years ago, Iowa athletics earned $7 million.
Iowa State earned $80,000.
For some reason though clone fans chose not to comment on that well cited and scrupulously reported set of facts. Why?
According to the Wall Street Journal reporting NCAA data, in 2019, iowa football Generated more revenue than a dozen big time and even elite programs, including the likes of Clemson, FSU, Oregon, USC, etc.
Why no comments on that? Instead, you link articles on a crime or two in the city this year? Seriously?
iowa completed over $150M in facility upgrades in recent years. Borrowed $30M to do it.
ISU completed $80M. Had to borrow $60.
I really can’t think of any more relevant set of numbers than those.
comments?
Last year saw one school have half of its season and its bowl game canceled, and that affected revenues, but ticket sales this season have been ahead of even 2019. So for Iowa, last year will end up being just a hiccup, and not their fault the B10 was quite cautious about Covid.
so we clearly need to look at longer-term history, as well as highly probable trends with each school being in VERY different conference situations. No one needs to throw up his hands and say there arent plenty of facts to compare. A typical propaganda strategy is to just muddy the waters, and that’s what’s been happening here.
so let’s get real, cite the sources of the numbers, give links, and be objective. I’ve been giving links all along and trying to stick to the numbers, media sources etc.