… because campaigns always leak that kind of info on election eve.
HOLY S%$T!! Harris 47 Trump 44, Final Selzer IOWA POLL!
- Thread starter pjhawk
- Start date
Odds you watch the Hawks tonight? Less than 0%?
People talk. They have aides and staff.
A dang Supreme Court ruling got leaked in advance.
I See your true lack of confidence. Your inaction shows so much more than everything you post.
I think the election is too close to call. I could easily see it going either way. If I had to guess, likely Trump, but low confidence. So, you’re right, I guess?
Yeah I’d avoid the Hawks question too if I were you. We know you’re too much down the rabbit hole to watch any Hawk football or basketball games.
So then you agree what you are posting is crap then. If we believed your posts TRUMP is winning handily.
Based on some interactions with that nutter, he assures us he's very wealthy and has a hot wife so he wouldn't dare risk his Barbie and Ken dream world to do something so extreme. Plus I'm guessing he's a little bitch in real life, anyhow. 😂
How can they be less than 0%?
I’ve grown tired of Fran’s teams. No hope for season championship or going on deep run in Tourney. No strong enough guard play or recruiting. Might watch some Hawkeye women ball though. See how the post-Clark era goes with Jensen.
I would be shocked if he has a spouse or any significant personal relationships that are not based online and that don't revolve around Elon/Tesla/"woke mind virus" type stuff.
Lol stop lying. You just beat off to Musk photos all day, that’s why you no longer watch them. You’re a joke & you watch as many sports as @KFsdisciple…which of course is none.
I'm not going anywhere lol
You propagandist twat. You won't be missed. 😁
Some of my posting is simply to temper the unabashed delusion of certain posters on this board so that they may not have a personal meltdown if the unlikely happens Tuesday night or whenever it gets decided.
There were 5-10 people on this board predicting a blowout landslide a month ago. They are delusional.
RCP may turnout to be wrong but just 1-2 days ago they had Trump winning every battleground state.
Trump’s battleground polling is better than 2016 AND 2020 at this point.
Maybe the polls are shockingly biased FOR Trump after being biased against him the prior two cycles, but I doubt it.
He may well win.
Oops I meant to type 47.2% Harris Walz. Thanks for the chance to correct. Ill edit.
If you can't trust an anonymous Twitter acct named Bad Hombre, I don't know how what to tell ya! 🤣
Btw can I just say it’s hilarious how many polling firms made their first appearance today? Research co? Survation?
So you're expecting every vote in Iowa to go to either Harris or Trump. SMFH
Just can't make this stuff up.
I don't know if this has been discussed but one hidden factor might be ag industry. Trump's tariffs were disastrous for the soybean market.
We will know tomorrow!
I've been waiting. No takers so far....pretty telling.
Saw clips of her on the trail this morning. She was giggling appeared to be living her best life.
Meanwhile, I've heard reporting coming from stinky don's camp that ketchup packages line the inside walls of his airplane, which probably mean he's pissed about something.
It's a guy just making stuff up. And you're posting it. Tells us a lot about you.
You're a more credible source for your info than Phenom's guy is for his.
You're an Elon Whore. That's the whole story.
I'll take the bet as long as the proceeds go to the Stead Children's Hospital and we add one month of posting privileges.
He took their lucrative China market and handed it right to Brazil with his ham-fisted tariffs 🤣
Your Rubles are worthless, comrade
You were on my very short ignore list but since I can see you've answered this by another posters reply, I took you off ignore for now.
So it's a bet? $200 dollars to Stead and 1 month of posting privileges as I understand the terms. This is a moneyline bet.
If you want the suggested 2 points, we are now betting with a spread and then the bet is 2 weeks of posting privileges lost for me if I lose, and 2 months for you.
Lol - I'll take the straight up bet. I'm happy to add to my donation to the Hospital on the off chance Harris wins Iowa.
Why didn't you take the offer from the other poster?
It's delicious watching your confidence crumble.
- Sep 13, 2002
- 98,661
- 206,519
- 113
Shaky start but it was actually their DEFENSE that broke the game open! How about that for a McCaffery team?
I like that Thelwel kid, too - has some toughness and grit. He and Harding make a nice couple of options at PG.
My biggest worry remains the 4 spot and rebounding. Need one of the other bigs to step up to help Freeman.
Traore being hurt did not help. Dembele looked bad. When Freeman gets in foul trouble, that’ll be trouble.
- Sep 13, 2002
- 98,661
- 206,519
- 113
I was trying to figure out what Dembele does well. Came up with "looks big and strong in his uniform" 🤷♂️
That team sucks.
At least we got baseball to look forward to in the Spring!
Producer- "Mr. Monkey, sir, the baseball team is gonna be even worse than last year."
.
.
.
.
.
I was
Thelwell has some hops. I was right there in that end of Carver on his dunk and holy crap.
I was at the game and I like our team, I just do not think we will be above a .500 team this year sadly. Oh well, I like the kids playing so there's that.
Thelwell has some hops. I was right there in that end of Carver on his dunk and holy crap.
- Sep 13, 2002
- 98,661
- 206,519
- 113
Don't let the fact they are a bunch of high fivin' white guys - this Iowa team is pretty good and should make a run toward a tournament berth. Freeman and Sandfort are legit first/second team Big 10 and the backcourt is strong. Patrick and Tony being off the squad is addition by subtraction on defense and effort.That team sucks.
At least we got baseball to look forward to in the Spring!
Producer- "Mr. Monkey, sir, the baseball team is gonna be even worse than last year."
.
.
.
.
.
I think they surprise some folks and finish in the 6th-4th spot in conference.
Dembele looked large, slow and out of game shape IMO.
