That seem odd to any of you? And yes, I know there’s a game thread, but I’m not wading through all the negativity to get some feedback on this.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Give this thread some time and it will be the same. All I know is I don't try to outsmart the experts who set the lines for a living. And yes I know (from everyone who will say how the lines move) the betting public influences the lines. But not as much as you would think with neither team really is a "national" team. If any of the two would be. it is Indiana. I'll take the Hawks -1 1/2 and under 160 1/2.That seem odd to any of you? And yes, I know there’s a game thread, but I’m not wading through all the negativity to get some feedback on this.
I don't see it. We generally don't shoot very well from the perimeter on the road. Maybe they could be right but I'm not expecting it.Give this thread some time and it will be the same. All I know is I don't try to outsmart the experts who set the lines for a living. And yes I know (from everyone who will say how the lines move) the betting public influences the lines. But not as much as you would think with neither team really is a "national" team. If any of the two would be. it is Indiana. I'll take the Hawks -1 1/2 and under 160 1/2.
If you are ever wondering why a line is the way that it is for college basketball, just go to KenPom as that analytics site heavily influences the betting market. KenPom has Iowa -2. The Analytics do not like Indiana--they are ranked below both Michigan and Minnesota on KenPom.That seem odd to any of you? And yes, I know there’s a game thread, but I’m not wading through all the negativity to get some feedback on this.
Indiana beat us but honestly my $$ is on the Hawks making the NIT over those fools.What an nit battle