Those citing Penn State's dominance as the primary factor in Iowa's performance under Brands should be reminded that if Penn State didn't exist, Iowa would've won 5 titles under Brands instead of 4. Every other year we still would've finished behind someone else.
Brands' legacy is leading Iowa to perennial top-4 finishes. That's nothing to shake a stick at, but it certainly wasn't the original goal.
Based on the fact that his contract has continued to be renewed and significantly sweetened, and his strategy and tactics haven't really changed, I think a rational person could safely assume that that is, in fact, the new bar.
Tom is doing his best, he is who he is, and I have no animosity toward him personally. I wish, like he surely must, that he were simply better, for no other reason that it makes me happier when Iowa wins and sadder when we don't.
(And he's welcome to note that Mo Willems writes better children's books than I do. That saddens me too.)