The CC Show....
- Thread starter Joes Place
- Start date
You don’t know Hawkeye soccer legend Cloe Lacasse, bro? International soccer star for Canada, former Arsenal cup winner, and current Utah Royals star player…
CC named unanimous ROY by AP. Swoopes sure can call it.
Think Joe will watch his first game today? Wonder if he bought a Sun jersey
That would be incredible for the Fever, considering it’s a three game series.
I KNOW I CHANGED IT BUT YOU RESPONDED WITHIN SECONDS
I just hope they can steal one in Connecticut. That 3rd game in Indy would be bananas
I heard that some anonymous person started a petition to remove all the voters for not accurately valuing turnovers enough. Looked up the petition and it’s off to a slow start, just one signature
Joe something……
Who knew all those voters just don’t know basketball.
Is that good? I think that's pretty good. One might even use the adjective dominant.
Sure
As I'd noted: If it's a "popularity contest", she's in.
If it's looking at her most recent performances, she's in (as in, 2nd half of the season, when she clearly has been one of the league's best)
If the award is for the entirety of the season, she was far less consistent early on compared to others in the league.
It's not that difficult to understand.
Well deserved
She was definitely better than Reese
And her late-season #s were comparable to A'ja Wilson's rookie season.
Irrelevant! It's her stats for the year she is getting awards for.
She got 4th for MVP for the entirety of the season. I checked with an expert the first half counts.
The are + to the negative side. I copy and pasted the formula.
AI Overview
Learn more…Opens in new tab
The WNBA's efficiency formula is:
| Formula | |
|---|---|
| Efficiency | (Points + Rebounds + Assists + Steals + Blocks) - ((Field Goals Att. - Field Goals Made) + (Free Throws Att. - Free Throws Made) + Turnovers) |
The efficiency formula is calculated by adding up the positive aspects of a player's game and subtracting the negative aspects.
Worst. Thread. Ever.
0 out of 10
Would not read again.
0 out of 10
Would not read again.
As I'd stated: "If it's a popularity contest"....
Quit arguing about stupid stuff. I'm sorry my original post was not clear, but after I posted how CC's efficiency stats were figured do you see how her turnovers were not a positive? I can admit my first post wasn't clear, can you admit EFF stats do punish players for turnovers?
Your inability to understand doesn’t change the results.
This rating is one that has been touted in this thread by some poster
Actually if it was a popularity contest(it isn’t) then 4th would be a terribly inaccurate result.
The attendance numbers and tv ratings show that.
Pro tip - your use of ‘as I’d stated’ doesn’t really have any credibility in this thread
‘Admit’ from Joe? Better chance of hell freezing of over
And knowing full well that Joe would argue that just because it is solid ice it isn’t really ‘frozen’
1-9 in the first half of their playoff game.
I'm sticking with "50 voters voting popularity over substance" at this point.
She also did not perform well in the AS game.
Based on the first half today, I'd say it is indeed a "terribly inaccurate result".
Mitchell has played much better (so far).
Let's see if she can prove me wrong, and show up in the 2nd half.
She's had a rough first half, but I wouldn't call her a "loser"
Let's see if she can build off 1-9 shooting and bring the team back.
Hull and Mitchell are carrying them right now.
Double figure assists. Drew defense to her and helped lead the team to a victory over the Olympic team. Pretty good
But she also has 2 steals and no turnovers. That’s worth 18.2 points.
Similar threads
