Best practices are always up for debate. But that debate needs to be among experts to determine the course of treatment not the general public or the government. The Cass Report is highly flawed and myopic - a bad choice on your part to use that as the basis of your stance. American doctors and medical professionals are constantly reviewing and revising their practices to become more effective. In fact:
Medical professionals emphasize the importance of family support in helping children with gender dysphoria. Key aspects include:
- Emotional Support: Providing unconditional love and acceptance is crucial. Children who feel supported by their families have better mental health outcomes.
- Open Communication: Families should create an environment where the child feels safe to express their feelings.
- Education: Families should seek to understand gender dysphoria and explore resources, including counseling and medical professionals, to support the child.
- Collaboration with Healthcare Providers: Working with mental health and medical professionals helps in navigating treatment options like social or medical transition.
Family support plays a key role in reducing risks of depression, anxiety, and other mental health issues in children with gender dysphoria.
This is a "best practice".
Absolutely I would advocate family support of an alcoholic. It's essential as a foundation to recovery. Why would you go against this best practice?
The decisions about treating gender dysphoria need to be made by families in consultation with medical experts based on their unique situation. Blanket, knee jerk reactionary decisions are harmful.