Joe Rogan tell you that?So it actually is true. That's great. You know what else? I bet if you just keep getting boosted your cats won't get sick either. Everyone get boosted to protect gdr's house full of cats!
Joe Rogan tell you that?So it actually is true. That's great. You know what else? I bet if you just keep getting boosted your cats won't get sick either. Everyone get boosted to protect gdr's house full of cats!
Like I'd told you: at least 6x and probably 10x.You are avoiding my question. How much lower does the vaccine drop the risk of mortality for a 40 year old? I want you to give me a percentage since you know it is so effective.
The vax did nothing to prevent spread of the disease.
Well "a lot" is not possible because a 40 year old only starts out with a 0.2% risk of dying. We are talking fractions of a percent. That is not "a lot"
You still follow Facebook adviceStill trying to scare people by overstating the risks. Sad.
Your little buddy made the "lots of renal failure" claim.Still trying to scare people by overstating the risks. Sad.
What do you consider an acceptable level of risk? Do you think it is possible to achieve 0% risk of dying with the vaccine? Because I can tell you that even vaccinated people die from covid.Your little buddy made the "lots of renal failure" claim.
Go look that up.
What do you consider an acceptable level of risk?
I see how you conviently ignored the part about the ARR. Smart.. if it doesn't fit your opinion then ignore it.When the risks of "driving w/o a seatbelt" are higher than driving with one, I take the lower risk
When the risks of an adverse reaction from a vaccine are lower than the risks of unvaccinated complications from the virus, I choose the vaccine.
Pretty simply stuff, really. I'll take the lower risks, wherever practical.
It is "absolute risk reduction"I see how you conviently ignored the part about the ARR.
LOLWUT?You also assume that the prevalence of covid has been a fixed rate since 2020.
What are you talking about with the renal failure argument? That was a specific example of how organs fail when they have covid and what ultimately leads to the patients death. There is no argument there.It is "absolute risk reduction"
Because the risks from the virus w/o vaccine protection are worse than the risks from the vaccines.
And you've completely backed away from your "renal failure" arguments, which vaccines will also protect against.
What are you talking about with the renal failure argument? That was a specific example of how organs fail when they have covid and what ultimately leads to the patients death.
Since you know so much, why don't you tell me how a covid patient is treated in the icu. This could be fun.No; renal failure leads to "dialysis"; many of them survive and need transplants.
Vaccines PREVENT the renal failure in at-risk patients. You can Google those citations up, as well.
Since you know so much
So you don't know, Image that. LolI READ.
Go look up some medical publications on the topic and you can be better informed, too.
So you don't know
That's because most of us are vaccinated now.This has a lot of interesting data to digest regarding covid in Wales. There is a lot of stuff to take in here, but it shows that covid is not a big deal for most people, very few die from covid
Lol, you must have missed the graph showing very few people got the most recent vaccine. Or when they say "97% of people are currently being treated primarily for other conditions and happen to test positive while in hospital or on admission."That's because most of us are vaccinated now.
They got previous vaccines.Lol, you must have missed the graph showing very few people got the most recent vaccine.
Really?There are lots of things in this report that follow what I have been telling you.
So, what if I’m super healthy, have had the vaccines and Covid…any reason to continue. I had a fever for 8!hours with Covid, 12 with each vaccine. No other symptomsWhen the risks of "driving w/o a seatbelt" are higher than driving with one, I take the lower risk
When the risks of an adverse reaction from a vaccine are lower than the risks of unvaccinated complications from the virus, I choose the vaccine.
Pretty simply stuff, really. I'll take the lower risks, wherever practical.
So, what if I’m super healthy, have had the vaccines and Covid…any reason to continue. I had a fever for 8!hours with Covid, 12 with each vaccine. No other symptoms
Super healthy people can still get the flu and get Covid infections.
Vaccines for flu absolutely limit the spread and lower your risk of a case that might kick you out of work for a week - most large companies I've ever worked for encourage everyone getting fall vaccinations, to minimize the risks they have a significant fraction of their workforce getting sick; most healthcare-associated jobs require it (e.g. if you have RepTrax, you typically don't get into any facility w/o proof of vaccination).
The same will likely be true for Covid moving forward.
And vaccines for either limit the spread of infections by:
All of those lower the R0 for an infectious virus (flu or Covid). And even a small alteration to the R0 can have dramatic effects on how many people end up infected.
- Shortening the time period you are sick, which likewise shortens the window of opportunity you have to infect other people
- Lowering your viral load, which lowers the risks for spreading infections because you're shedding less virus on others
- Preventing you from getting sick, altogether, which means you cannot spread the virus to someone else (who may not be able to get a vaccine)
Do I need to run those numbers for you (for the eleventieth time)?
And, in case you weren't aware, mortality risks for Covid are many times higher than flu (even in 2023)
0-17 yrs: ~1.6x higher18-29 yrs: 4.9x higher30-39 yrs: 5.4x higher40-49 yrs: 7.5x higher50-64 yrs: 7.9x higher65-74 yrs: 11.2x higher75-84 yrs: 13.6x higher85+ yrs: 17.1x higher
ONLY in kids is Covid not significantly a higher mortality risk than Covid ('just' about 2x), today.
Every other age group, you're 5x or more likely to die from it than from flu. And a typical flu season is 20k to 50k deaths per year, so if we get as many Covid infections as flu infections, we'll easily still have 100k+ Covid deaths per year. Which are not "just going to be old people", it will be lots of young adults as well.
If you still like your grandparents or older parents, getting a flu shot and Covid shot might help protect them, if you give a shit about them.
COVID-19 Provisional Counts - Weekly Updates by Select Demographic and Geographic Characteristics
Tabulated data on provisional COVID-19 deaths by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, and comorbidities. Also includes an index of state-level and county-level mortality data available for download.www.cdc.gov
I can't believe you're still on here spreading stupidity. The majority of your replies on this thread are total bullshit as usual. Nice "Personal review" paper from Dunning Krueger Joe who always touts RCTs yet uses this piece of shit opinion paper as "science" promoted by the pharma captured dipshit Eric Topol. Please inject yourself with a clot shot every month. They are so safe and effective there's no reason not too.
Maybe send Dr. Offit a note, and ask him that if vaccines lower the R0 for the virus (which they do), how many cases and older people (e.g. parents/grandparents deaths) we might avoid.I don't yet know what I will do with boosters going forward. Lacking education in a field that would allow me to fully understand all of the data, I chose to rely upon the advice of experts, and Dr. Paul Offit is the one that for whatever reason I have chosen to trust the most. He seems pro vaccine, but data driven on who should be vaccinated, how often, and with what. I might be interpreting this quote out of context, but it is interesting that Dr. Offit doesn't seem to think that Covid vaccinations should follow a seasonal flu shot model.
Dr. Paul Offit, a vaccine scientist and professor of pediatrics in the Division of Infectious Diseases at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and a member of the advisory committee, emphasized before the meeting that it’s important to discuss who needs an updated vaccine this fall.
“What’s the goal of the vaccine?” he asked. “If the goal of the vaccine is the stated goal, which is protection against severe disease, do you really need a yearly vaccine for otherwise healthy people less than 75? I mean, is this the flu model? Because I would argue it shouldn’t be.”
FDA advisers recommend that Covid-19 boosters for fall should drop original strain
Yep.I can't believe you're still on here spreading facts.
So if the previous vaccine is still working, why get a new one?They got previous vaccines.
1. I see you are making progress. You will finally admit that kids have minimal risk of death from covid. I'll take this as a win since earlier you wouldn't even admit this.Super healthy people can still get the flu and get Covid infections.
Vaccines for flu absolutely limit the spread and lower your risk of a case that might kick you out of work for a week - most large companies I've ever worked for encourage everyone getting fall vaccinations, to minimize the risks they have a significant fraction of their workforce getting sick; most healthcare-associated jobs require it (e.g. if you have RepTrax, you typically don't get into any facility w/o proof of vaccination).
The same will likely be true for Covid moving forward.
And vaccines for either limit the spread of infections by:
All of those lower the R0 for an infectious virus (flu or Covid). And even a small alteration to the R0 can have dramatic effects on how many people end up infected.
- Shortening the time period you are sick, which likewise shortens the window of opportunity you have to infect other people
- Lowering your viral load, which lowers the risks for spreading infections because you're shedding less virus on others
- Preventing you from getting sick, altogether, which means you cannot spread the virus to someone else (who may not be able to get a vaccine)
Do I need to run those numbers for you (for the eleventieth time)?
And, in case you weren't aware, mortality risks for Covid are many times higher than flu (even in 2023)
0-17 yrs: ~1.6x higher18-29 yrs: 4.9x higher30-39 yrs: 5.4x higher40-49 yrs: 7.5x higher50-64 yrs: 7.9x higher65-74 yrs: 11.2x higher75-84 yrs: 13.6x higher85+ yrs: 17.1x higher
ONLY in kids is Covid not significantly a higher mortality risk than Covid ('just' about 2x), today.
Every other age group, you're 5x or more likely to die from it than from flu. And a typical flu season is 20k to 50k deaths per year, so if we get as many Covid infections as flu infections, we'll easily still have 100k+ Covid deaths per year. Which are not "just going to be old people", it will be lots of young adults as well.
If you still like your grandparents or older parents, getting a flu shot and Covid shot might help protect them, if you give a shit about them.
COVID-19 Provisional Counts - Weekly Updates by Select Demographic and Geographic Characteristics
Tabulated data on provisional COVID-19 deaths by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, and comorbidities. Also includes an index of state-level and county-level mortality data available for download.www.cdc.gov
So if the previous vaccine is still working, why get a new one?
1. I see you are making progress. You will finally admit that kids have minimal risk of death from covid.
No, it is not2. When you say you are 5x more likely to die from covid than the flu. This is very misleading.
Why are you an Immune System denier? I take offense to your quackery propagandaBoth previous vaccinations AND previous infections fade with respect to the protection they provide you against new variants.
And the simple fact that Covid is still 5x+ more lethal than flu would be a solid indicator of that...
Why are you an Immune System denier?