The point is that hitting on dresser for no individual champs is stupid. Coaches are judged based on their team performances. Dresser’s teams consistently perform at a high level. KJ had multiple individual champs, but it is clear what coach anyone would want on their team.A title with no champs has only been done once in recent memory...they had 10 AAs. So which is more logical...WasDT stating that you need champs to win titles or your scenario of a decade of titles with no champs? You give a near impossible scenario to justify your defense of Dresser not putting guys on top of the podium.
Yes...Brands would lose his job if he consistently finished top ten but had no individual titles. I am old enough to remember when we finished second with no champs and folks were calling for his head.
So, yes, I used an unlikely hypothetical to prove a point.