1. Marinelli faded late, but still SIGNIFICANTLY over performed preseason expectations. Again, if he under performed expectations at NCAAs it was because he had over performed all year long and expectations were raised. In other words, the complete opposite of your claim.
2. No he was not. Doubling down does not make it true. Highest he was ever ranked was 5th after midlands, and part of that was freshman Darmstadt still climbing the rankings because he hadn't hit top guys yet (eventual 2 seed) and Rasheed still ranked lower because he hadn't been the starter at that point. Cash was ranked 11th to start the year, entirely based on his miracle NCAA run where he didn't even actually qualify. He was unranked for all of his freshman year and became a legit top 10 guy last year.
3. Sam Stoll started ranked 7th, and more importantly was coming off two torn ACLs as a heavyweight. He was one of the biggest question marks in the country coming into last year. Him becoming a big time point scorer was a huge surprise.
Another thing to remember is that the team scored the most bonus of any team last year at NCAAs. If you predicted that preseason, you would have been institutionalized.
I'll repeat it one more time because you don't seem to understand. To the extent that Iowa under performed at nationals, it was because expectations were raised late in the season after pretty much their whole team significantly over performed preseason expectations. Iowa was ranked 9th to start the year. They finished 3rd. They call that over performing.
Your claim that expectations were lowered late is literally the opposite of what happened. Either start paying attention or consider posting less.