BIG will get 8-9, no way on 7 barring a complete collapse by an Iowa or team that is firmly entrenched now.
That would never happen...
BIG will get 8-9, no way on 7 barring a complete collapse by an Iowa or team that is firmly entrenched now.
HAHA, I know I chuckled while typing that.That would never happen...
I do not believe that the Big10 will get 10 teams in , just as I do not believe the Big 12 will get 8 teams in . Those are numbers that would be records probably for both conferences. Heck, 8 of 10 from the Big 12 is 80% and I really doubt that ANY league has had that high a percent get in. I am thinking the Big 10 will be somewhere are around 7-8 and the Big 12 will be 6-7.
Here’s where I think many people on the matrix are missing it and the number one bracketologist out there is nailing it (Iowa as a 4 seed). Iowa’s SOS is tripping people up mostly due to a bad NCONSOS. The committee however will look at that and say yeah that’s bad however they won every single game and most by a convincing amount. I don’t think the actual non con rank there will hurt us the way it is now for people who have Iowa as a 6,7,8. ZERO quad 2,3,4 losses, average NET loss under 15, and 8 quad 1 and 2 wins.. Our company for those three factors? Virginia and Michigan State
Texas and Shaka Smart, or "How to do less with more" .The Big 12 has an infinitely better chance at getting 8 than the B1G does at getting 10. That said, the B1G is trending more towards 8 while the 7 seems to be a lock for the Big 12, maybe 8, as long as Texas/TCU/Oklahoma don’t pull an Indiana.
That post was also before two recent lossesHere is the disconnect : Virginia and MSU are currently #1 and #6 on the Net Ranking, while Iowa is #27. Although Net Ranking is not the only factor for your seed, I am guessing it wont' be far off, and this is the book of record for the NCAA selection committee. Personally I thought it sucked earlier, but as time goes on, it seems to be getting more accurate. For example, Nebraska is falling like a rock on Net Ranking, which they should. At one time they were top 15.
We're getting close to home!!Feb 1 BRACKETOLOGY
Lunardi is still projecting 10 B1G teams
Iowa is STILL a 6 seed but NOW in the Midwest (Des Moines!!!), will beat #11 St Johns in the 1st round and then beat #3 Kansas in the 2nd round. Iowa then will face/beat #2 North Carolina and #1 seed Tennessee to advance to the Final 4 in Minneapolis!!!
I thought Iowa or ISU had to be at least a 4 seed to make it to Des Moines for the 1st 2 roundsHere is the disconnect : Virginia and MSU are currently #1 and #6 on the Net Ranking, while Iowa is #27. Although Net Ranking is not the only factor for your seed, I am guessing it wont' be far off, and this is the book of record for the NCAA selection committee. Personally I thought it sucked earlier, but as time goes on, it seems to be getting more accurate. For example, Nebraska is falling like a rock on Net Ranking, which they should. At one time they were top 15.
Crickets chirping.............The next bracketology should be in a day or 2.
I still want Duke!
Hoooooze with me?
![]()
Unfortunately, Ohio State is now in the 8/9 & would play Duke if they won.Crickets chirping.............
Not disagreeing but where do you find him ranked first? I can’t find him on Bracket Matrix. FWIW, the top 2 guys there have us a 5.If you want to make this thread better you’ll use Bracket Guy Dave’s Bracketology and seed lists. He’s the number one Bracketologist over the last five years. Lunardi on the other hands ranks 68th.. Hard to take any of his projections serious
We could randomly get assigned to Des Moines against a higher seed. I was mocking Kansas as a 3 getting sent there and Iowa as the 6, for example...I thought Iowa or ISU had to be at least a 4 seed to make it to Des Moines for the 1st 2 rounds
Is that wrong? Or does Lunardi not know this?
If you click rankings he’s the second one there behind Delphi. Delphi only updates once every few days though. He is “Bracketville”Not disagreeing but where do you find him ranked first? I can’t find him on Bracket Matrix. FWIW, the top 2 guys there have us a 5.
Got it. We were talking about the same thing. Yeah Lunardi sucks and Palm is even worse. He’s damn near the bottom.If you click rankings he’s the second one there behind Delphi. Delphi only updates once every few days though. He is “Bracketville”
But his twitter is BracketGuyDave
Comparing the Selection Committee's Top 16 to the NET Top 16:
Rank..Select Comm..NET
1......... Duke.............Virginia
2 .........Tenn..............Gonzaga
3 .........Virginia..........Duke
4 .........Gonzaga.......Tennessee
----------------------------------------------------
5 .........Kentucky.......Kentucky
6 .........Michigan.......Michigan
7 .........N Carolina.....Houston
8 .........Mich State.....North Carolina
----------------------------------------------------
9 .........Purdue...........Michigan State
10 .........Kansas........Virginia Tech
11 .........Houston.......Purdue
12 .........Marquette....Wisconsin
----------------------------------------------------
13 .........Iowa State....Iowa State
14 .........Nevada........Louisville
15 .........Louisville......Nevada
16 .........Wisconsin.....Texas Tech
Hard to say but it does give them 2 quad 2 losses to our 0. Their analytics are still much better than Iowa’s.With IA State losing at home to TCU, Iowa should pass them in the rankings, right?
Thanks, but that wasn't much to me. I could not wade through it all plus it is as of yesterday.
With IA State losing at home to TCU, Iowa should pass them in the rankings, right?
Andy Katz is implying that the Selection Committee views Iowa as somewhere between #17 and #20. This is why Katz has Iowa as a 5 seed.Hard to say but it does give them 2 quad 2 losses to our 0. Their analytics are still much better than Iowa’s.
just seems like a lot of moving parts before Selection SundayI want to see what comes Monday out after Iowa wins on Sunday.
it is interesting that the one guy said Iowa right now had a 20 percent chance of playing in Des Moines.No NCAA tourney games in Eastern Iowa.
![]()
The committee chair stated that Texas Tech was one of the teams in the mix for a 4 seed during the show. Katz has them as a 6. He does not speak for the committee. LSU, TTU, and Nova were the teams mentioned by the chair outside the 16.Andy Katz is implying that the Selection Committee views Iowa as somewhere between #17 and #20. This is why Katz has Iowa as a 5 seed.
Remember, the Selection Committee Chair was in attendance for the Iowa at IU game. Good timing & good luck for Iowa because I am guessing he might like this Iowa team and he might have conveyed to the committee that this Iowa team is not too bad.
Thoughts?
just seems like a lot of moving parts before Selection Sunday
Did you see this article? They talk about not having Kansas playing in Kansas City & not having Louisville playing on their home court. How far does the Selection Committee go in order to not give teams an unfair home court advantage?
LINK: http://www.espn.com/chalk/story/_/i...r-beater-reviews-tournament-no-final-decision
Houston is having a great season. I worked with someone who remembers Kelvin Sampson from high school back in the '80's.and then beat #3 Houston
i can't believe he was allowed to coach in D1 after the NCAA violations at IndianaHouston is having a great season. I worked with someone who remembers Kelvin Sampson from high school back in the '80's.
Was this today? LSU winning last night will push them into a top 4, they are undefeated on the road in the SEC. They are going to be a nasty match up for anyone with that size and that water bug point guard, who can drive on anyone. I think if they can avoid the Duke bracket they stand a very good shot at the final 4.FWIW, the USA Today also has Iowa as a 6 seed.
CLICK ON IMAGE FOR LARGER VIEW
![]()