Yes, very much and that was because the party and Biden chose to ignore them. The voting split for Latinos in the Rio Grande Valley in favor of Trump should have been easily predicted based on the voting for Abbott and and other state GOP, but the DNC just figured they would be pro-Biden by a wide margin.
***Official 2020 Presidential Election Thread - The Purge***
- Thread starter HROT
- Start date
Yes, very much and that was because the party and Biden chose to ignore them. The voting split for Latinos in the Rio Grande Valley in favor of Trump should have been easily predicted based on the voting for Abbott and and other state GOP, but the DNC just figured they would be pro-Biden by a wide margin.
I went to bed at like 1030 last night im not sure i even posted in the last 30 pages. Keep swinging though Charlie.
Many have over the years I have done a long test case study and will let you know the ones who think that are quite special I've noticed from that large sample size.
Had to post twice b/c we ignored this garbage the first time, eh,
Either drink another cup of coffee or go back to bed. That was tough to read.
Well I'm not as fast as I was when I was a teenager but I'm not sure what that has to do with the statistics being reported by 538....
Anyone with even a casual understand of what is going on with vote tabulations, knows why those charts are fine
Incorrect. Only if you are getting your news from dipshit right-wingers on twitter.
November 1, 2020 Voter Registration Statistics | Wisconsin Elections Commission
The State of Wisconsin had 3,684,726 active registered voters on November 1, 2020. Wisconsin does not collect information on the gender, race or political party affiliation of registered voters.
elections.wi.gov
The State of Wisconsin had 3,684,726 active registered voters on November 1, 2020.
The total number of votes cast in Wisconsin was just shy of 3.3 million.
If you voted for this find something heavy nearby, pick it up and swing as hard as you can at your head.
It’s not true. The link is some dipshit on twitter that undercounted the number of registered voters in Wisconsin by 500,000 people.
Really?......
You are of the belief votes were being counted and they were stock piling them so they could say ok we have 1xxxxx for Biden?
But where is he with the other 1 EC vote in Maine? And did Biden get 1 EC from Nebraska yet? If so, Biden won't need Pennsylvania.
That's not what's happening, anyone with an iota of brain knows that.
If I gave you 15,000 cookies and 400 candy bars, which do you think could finish first? Now of those 15,000 cookies, 13,000 are blue. When you count them it looks like the chart your talking about.
and to add on its Republicans who prevented counting these votes beforehand. So your reap what you sow.
Is the Trump Train at your home now?
Ok let's go with that. Do you actually think there is anywhere in the Midwest that is 13k of 15k blue? (Which is actually a more believable percentage than what they are showing) He didn't even put up numbers like that In Dade County or Austin TX.
Assuming Biden wins Arizona, Nevada, Wisconsin, and Michigan, Trump could win both Georgia and Pennsylvania and will still lose.
Donald Trump is the Atlanta Falcons of politics.
He only wants the score in the first half to count.
Yes like every major city in this country breaks 2 to 1 or greater to Biden. He didn't need 85 percent to get there.
You guys made this decision to delay counting these votes. You don't get to now go call them illegitimate.
Maybe you should leave and take a civics course in High School again, this is all very easily understandable.
Even then he's still done. He has to bring back ARizona (which is unlikely given they have finished counting the election day votes)
I would suggest that anyone who thinks that adding ultra-liberal Julian Castro and his open borders policy to the ticket would have improved the Democrats performance with Latino voters is disastrously, willfully, almost to a racist extent misunderstanding Latino voters.
But they just keep doing it.
Here's the news flash again...the Democratic party, as defined by its members most visible in the media, and like 9 out of 10 of it's primary candidates, is now to the left of most Latino and African American voters. There are still systemic reasons they trend Democrat, but Democrats have to realize that the moderate voters they risk alienating are black, and to a very large extent Hispanic.
Trump made inroads. Those inroads will continue if the Democratic party doesn't pull more to the center, and if the Republicans can keep from major racist embarrassments for, I don't know, like 3 hours at a time.
You understand a straight vertical line running perfectly perpendicular to a flat line suggest 100% of the votes that came in were for Biden right? That doesn't happen in the real world.
To this point the state of Michigan has already said the reason foe that was a typo in which they accidently added hundreds of thousands of votes but retracted them, that's how you get vertical lines on a graph.
Last edited:
Dude - Trump spent several months claiming that mail-in ballots were fraudulent and urging his supporters to vote in person. Additionally, we know that Democrats are much more likely to take COVID—19 seriously, and are more likely to vote by mail than in person. Finally, you have these mail-in ballots being counted in urban areas where Biden is likely to garner at least 67+% of the vote already. Do you really think, given the above, that it is surprising that the mail-in ballots are breaking hard for Biden?
It's not straight you dip.
It looks straight on a graph over a condensed period of time, but that takes an understand on how to read to understand that. If you have an Y axis of this much time, but then get a big batch of votes at once that are heavily towards one person, it looks straight.
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
HawkCast Ep. 80 OVERREACTION TIME? Iowa Releases Pre-Camp Depth Chart
- Latest: Eliot Clough
