*****UCONN vs Iowa (W) Game Thread*****
- Thread starter QChawks
- Start date
-
- Tags
- qcpizzasucks
I think critiques of the call are fine. What gets me is assuming UConn makes a bucket there. Frankly Iowa has recovered and it was going to be a forced shot. Also the conspiracy theory folks drove me nuts. If there is a conspiracy there is absolutely no way you wait for that moment. It would have been very easy to foul out 2-3 UCONN players of there was a conspiracy.
I was was watching that and thought that Caitlin gave the air of zero shits given about Geno
right right, but people are mad about taking away that chance. like being called offsides on a recovered onside kick.
well, that's what you get when you move your elbow into the opponent....
The UConn campus is pretty much literally ESPN's backyard, so of course they are going to skew all viewpoints in their favor.ESPN talking about the FOUL...
Hannah was a bad ass bitch all night.
Again, pay attention to the screener's left elbow and forearm
Extending/reaching to create contact is a foul. Or at least, should be.
yup, she tried to be sneaky and it backfired....poor Geno...lol
Martin was pretty damn clutch down the stretch.
A foul no question
LOL...
And now ESPN.. time to have former UConn players to get their thoughts on the foul call..
And now ESPN.. time to have former UConn players to get their thoughts on the foul call..
Its sort of like that phantom call when we played Minnesota in football. This time it went our way.
Gabby did a good job of selling that call. Personally, I thought it was a foul, but pretty tough to call in that situation. I mean, if that would have been us, this board would be blowing up.
Like an illegal fair catch signal….lol
watch Gabbie's immediate reaction... there is no doubt that's a foul
I think that she missed some chances to drive the ball.
She sold it well, but she does that. It's part of her being a good player
diana taurasi , “ that offensive foul didn’t need to be called, they still got over the screen” uhhh wut, gabby was like 5 ft away from the ball handler after the chicken wing. Iowa had good help defense still, but the illegal screen still provided an advantage. Don’t screen with your arms out side of your shoulders, that is pretty easy to avoid.
Van Pelt says the call shouldn't have been made with 3.9 seconds left. It was a blatant foul and should have been called at any point in the game.
It was a foul. Period. Elbow, forearm, and hip all extend.
Coopers fair catch penalty was a million times worse than this call.
Coopers fair catch penalty was a million times worse than this call.
It was a foul! The call should be made in the first minute of the game or the last minute.
Could SVP kiss UConn's butt any more than he did?
Could SVP kiss UConn's butt any more than he did?
A million times zero is still zero. But i agree with your sentiment
Chicken wing sticks out
I noticed that.
CC didn't exactly want to hear anything from Geno after he dissed her last weekend.
Fvck you, UCONN.
yeah its a weak argument. if the argument is "ya its a fould but..... not in the last seconds", why should 1 team get to settle it on the court by doing something illegal?
Yes, clearly it was a foul. But the sad reality is that fouls are not called evenly throughout the game. No one is complaining if that gets called with 6 minutes to play in the second quarter. But the BS narrative that the game should be decided by the players and not the refs ignores the fact that the refs change the outcome by not calling an obvious foul.
Similar threads
